Suppr超能文献

系统性硬化症患者中土耳其语版硬皮病皮肤患者报告结局的信度和效度

Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of Scleroderma Skin Patient-Reported Outcome in patients with systemic sclerosis.

作者信息

Sari Fulden, Bazancir Apaydin Zilan, Apaydin Hakan, Kayaalp Mehmet, Erden Abdulsamet, Can Güven Serdar, Armağan Berkan, Omma Ahmet, Kucuksahin Orhan, Erten Şükran

机构信息

Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Bingöl University, Bingöl, Türkiye.

Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Medipol University, Ankara, Türkiye.

出版信息

Arch Rheumatol. 2023 Jun 14;39(1):52-59. doi: 10.46497/ArchRheumatol.2023.10183. eCollection 2024 Mar.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to translate the Scleroderma Skin Patient-Reported Outcome (SSPRO) questionnaire to the Turkish (SSPRO-T) language and to assess its validity and reliability.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-four systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients (51 females, 3 males; mean age: 49.8±10.4 years; range, 22 to 65 years) participated in the reliability and validity analysis between October 2022 and December 2022. The translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the SSPRO-T was applied in accordance with the procedure described by the Beaton guidelines. The SSPRO-T, the Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ), the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Skindex-29, and patient global skin severity were conducted in all participants for construct validity. The SSPRO-T was retested to assess its reliability after seven days.

RESULTS

The SSPRO-T had a four-factor structure. The total SSPRO-T score and its subgroups correlated positively with SHAQ, HAQ-DI, Skindex-29, and patient global skin severity. The internal consistency and reliability were excellent in overall SSPRO-T and in the subgroups: physical effect, emotional effect, physical limitation, and social effect (Cronbach's α=0.94, 0.80, 0.95, 0.93, and 0.84, respectively). The SSPRO-T had excellent test-retest reliability (r=0.91, p<0.001). In addition, no floor effect or ceiling effect was observed.

CONCLUSION

The SSPRO-T questionnaire is a reliable and valid tool and can be used in research and clinical practice in Turkish patients with SSc.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在将硬皮病皮肤患者报告结局(SSPRO)问卷翻译成土耳其语(SSPRO-T),并评估其有效性和可靠性。

患者与方法

2022年10月至2022年12月期间,54例系统性硬化症(SSc)患者(51例女性,3例男性;平均年龄:49.8±10.4岁;范围22至65岁)参与了可靠性和有效性分析。SSPRO-T的翻译和跨文化适应按照比顿指南所述的程序进行。对所有参与者进行了SSPRO-T、硬皮病健康评估问卷(SHAQ)、健康评估问卷残疾指数(HAQ-DI)、Skindex-29和患者整体皮肤严重程度评估,以进行结构效度分析。七天后对SSPRO-T进行重新测试以评估其可靠性。

结果

SSPRO-T具有四因素结构。SSPRO-T总分及其亚组与SHAQ、HAQ-DI、Skindex-29和患者整体皮肤严重程度呈正相关。SSPRO-T整体及其亚组:身体影响、情绪影响、身体限制和社会影响的内部一致性和可靠性极佳(克朗巴哈α系数分别为0.94、0.80、0.95、0.93和0.84)。SSPRO-T具有出色的重测信度(r = 0.91,p < 0.001)。此外,未观察到地板效应或天花板效应。

结论

SSPRO-T问卷是一种可靠且有效的工具,可用于土耳其SSc患者的研究和临床实践。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4589/11104756/62fbf47f031d/AR-2024-39-1-052-059-F1.jpg

相似文献

1
Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of Scleroderma Skin Patient-Reported Outcome in patients with systemic sclerosis.
Arch Rheumatol. 2023 Jun 14;39(1):52-59. doi: 10.46497/ArchRheumatol.2023.10183. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Development and validation of a patient-reported outcome instrument for skin involvement in patients with systemic sclerosis.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Aug;76(8):1374-1380. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210534. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
3
Validation of Turkish version of the Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire.
Clin Rheumatol. 2019 Jul;38(7):1917-1923. doi: 10.1007/s10067-019-04494-5. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
5
Systemic Sclerosis Quality of Life Questionnaire (SScQoL): translation into Turkish and assessing its psychometric properties.
Clin Rheumatol. 2023 Aug;42(8):2135-2143. doi: 10.1007/s10067-023-06626-4. Epub 2023 May 13.
6
Validation of the Portuguese Version of the Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Nov 14;20(22):7062. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20227062.
7
Translation and validation of the Persian version of the scleroderma health assessment questionnaire (SHAQ).
Intern Emerg Med. 2023 Apr;18(3):811-819. doi: 10.1007/s11739-023-03229-4. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
8
Validation of Turkish version of the Cochin 17-item Scleroderma Functional scale.
Physiother Theory Pract. 2023 Mar;39(3):576-581. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2021.2021574. Epub 2022 Jan 2.
10
The validity and reliability of the Swedish version of the Satisfaction with appearance scale for individuals with systemic sclerosis.
J Scleroderma Relat Disord. 2023 Feb;8(1):53-63. doi: 10.1177/23971983221107858. Epub 2022 Jul 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of Turkish version of the Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire.
Clin Rheumatol. 2019 Jul;38(7):1917-1923. doi: 10.1007/s10067-019-04494-5. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
2
The impact of systemic sclerosis on health-related quality of life assessed by SF-36: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Int J Rheum Dis. 2018 Nov;21(11):1884-1893. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.13438. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
3
Development and validation of a patient-reported outcome instrument for skin involvement in patients with systemic sclerosis.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Aug;76(8):1374-1380. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210534. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
4
Vasculopathy in scleroderma.
Semin Immunopathol. 2015 Sep;37(5):489-500. doi: 10.1007/s00281-015-0505-5. Epub 2015 Jul 8.
5
Longitudinal evaluation of PROMIS-29 and FACIT-dyspnea short forms in systemic sclerosis.
J Rheumatol. 2015 Jan;42(1):64-72. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.140143. Epub 2014 Nov 1.
8
The symptom burden index: development and initial findings from use with patients with systemic sclerosis.
J Rheumatol. 2010 Aug 1;37(8):1692-8. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.090504. Epub 2010 Jun 1.
9
Health-related quality of life in systemic sclerosis: a systematic review.
Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Aug 15;61(8):1112-20. doi: 10.1002/art.24676.
10
Development and validation of a scale for mouth handicap in systemic sclerosis: the Mouth Handicap in Systemic Sclerosis scale.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2007 Dec;66(12):1651-5. doi: 10.1136/ard.2007.070532. Epub 2007 May 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验