Mouthon L, Rannou F, Bérezné A, Pagnoux C, Arène J-P, Foïs E, Cabane J, Guillevin L, Revel M, Fermanian J, Poiraudeau S
Department of Internal Medicine, Cochin Hospital, 27 rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, 75679 Paris Cedex 14, France.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2007 Dec;66(12):1651-5. doi: 10.1136/ard.2007.070532. Epub 2007 May 14.
To develop and assess the reliability and construct validity of a scale assessing disability involving the mouth in systemic sclerosis (SSc).
We generated a 34-item provisional scale from mailed responses of patients (n = 74), expert consensus (n = 10) and literature analysis. A total of 71 other SSc patients were recruited. The test-retest reliability was assessed using the intraclass coefficient correlation and divergent validity using the Spearman correlation coefficient. Factor analysis followed by varimax rotation was performed to assess the factorial structure of the scale.
The item reduction process retained 12 items with 5 levels of answers (total score range 0-48). The mean total score of the scale was 20.3 (SD 9.7). The test-retest reliability was 0.96. Divergent validity was confirmed for global disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), r = 0.33), hand function (Cochin Hand Function Scale, r = 0.37), inter-incisor distance (r = -0.34), handicap (McMaster-Toronto Arthritis questionnaire (MACTAR), r = 0.24), depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD); HADd, r = 0.26) and anxiety (HADa, r = 0.17). Factor analysis extracted 3 factors with eigenvalues of 4.26, 1.76 and 1.47, explaining 63% of the variance. These 3 factors could be clinically characterised. The first factor (5 items) represents handicap induced by the reduction in mouth opening, the second (5 items) handicap induced by sicca syndrome and the third (2 items) aesthetic concerns.
We propose a new scale, the Mouth Handicap in Systemic Sclerosis (MHISS) scale, which has excellent reliability and good construct validity, and assesses specifically disability involving the mouth in patients with SSc.
开发并评估一种评估系统性硬化症(SSc)口腔功能障碍的量表的信度和结构效度。
我们通过患者(n = 74)的邮寄回复、专家共识(n = 10)和文献分析生成了一个包含34个条目的初步量表。另外招募了71例SSc患者。使用组内相关系数评估重测信度,使用Spearman相关系数评估区分效度。进行因子分析并采用方差最大化旋转来评估量表的因子结构。
条目删减过程保留了12个条目,有5级答案(总分范围0 - 48)。量表的平均总分是20.3(标准差9.7)。重测信度为0.96。在整体功能障碍(健康评估问卷(HAQ),r = 0.33)、手部功能(科钦手部功能量表,r = 0.37)、切牙间距离(r = -0.34)、功能障碍(麦克马斯特 - 多伦多关节炎问卷(MACTAR),r = 0.24)、抑郁(医院焦虑抑郁量表(HAD);HADd,r = 0.26)和焦虑(HADa,r = 0.17)方面证实了区分效度。因子分析提取了3个因子,特征值分别为4.26、1.76和1.47,解释了63%的方差。这3个因子具有临床特征。第一个因子(5个条目)代表因张口受限引起的功能障碍,第二个因子(5个条目)代表由干燥综合征引起的功能障碍,第三个因子(2个条目)代表美观问题。
我们提出了一种新的量表,即系统性硬化症口腔功能障碍(MHISS)量表,它具有出色的信度和良好的结构效度,专门用于评估SSc患者的口腔功能障碍。