Bergmame Lana, Shaw Steven
McGill University, CA.
Contin Educ. 2021 Jul 15;2(1):76-108. doi: 10.5334/cie.28. eCollection 2021.
Adolescence is a challenging time for the medical management of type 1 diabetes. Thus, a range of psychoeducational interventions have been developed to improve diabetes management among youth. Systematic reviews of this literature have emphasized the effectiveness of interventions for improving patient outcomes. However, knowledge beyond what works is required for interventions to be adopted into routine clinical practice. The objective of this scoping review was to map the clinical utility of the literature based on a variety of indicators, including the problem base, context placement, information gain, transparency, pragmatism, and patient-centeredness of the research. This lens for reviewing research is consistent with the biopsychosocial model and an increasing focus on reducing disability, including activity limitation and participation restriction. PsycINFO, MEDLINE, and CINHAL databases were searched for evaluative psychoeducational intervention studies published between January 2005 and October 2020. Two cited reference searches and one reference list search were also performed. Fifty studies describing 46 different interventions were identified. The clinical utility of the interventions was highly variable. A detailed overview of the clinical utility of the literature is provided with an emphasis on current gaps and shortcomings to be addressed in future research. This work helps advance the translation of clinical knowledge into practice in schools, homes, and communities; and, ultimately, improve the health and well-being of adolescents with T1D.
青春期对于1型糖尿病的医疗管理而言是一个具有挑战性的时期。因此,已经开发了一系列心理教育干预措施来改善青少年的糖尿病管理。对该文献的系统评价强调了干预措施在改善患者预后方面的有效性。然而,要将干预措施纳入常规临床实践,还需要了解其作用之外的知识。本范围综述的目的是根据各种指标,包括研究的问题基础、背景定位、信息获取、透明度、实用性和以患者为中心,来梳理文献的临床实用性。这种审视研究的视角与生物心理社会模型以及越来越关注减少残疾(包括活动受限和参与限制)相一致。我们在PsycINFO、MEDLINE和CINHAL数据库中检索了2005年1月至2020年10月发表的评估性心理教育干预研究。还进行了两次引用文献检索和一次参考文献列表检索。共识别出50项描述46种不同干预措施的研究。这些干预措施的临床实用性差异很大。本文详细概述了文献的临床实用性,并着重指出了未来研究中需要解决的当前差距和不足。这项工作有助于推动临床知识在学校、家庭和社区中的实践转化;并最终改善1型糖尿病青少年的健康和福祉。