Division of Hematology/Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2024 May;7(5):e2102. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.2102.
Thalidomide-containing regimens cause adverse events (AEs) that may require a reduction in treatment intensity or even treatment discontinuation in patients with multiple myeloma. As thalidomide toxicity is dose-dependent, identifying the most appropriate dose for each patient is essential.
This study aimed to investigate the effects of a thalidomide dose step-up strategy on treatment response and progression-free survival (PFS).
This prospective observational study included 93 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who received bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTD). The present study assessed the incidence of thalidomide dose reduction and discontinuation, the overall dose intensity, and their effects on therapeutic efficacy. Furthermore, this study used Cox proportional hazard models to analyze the factors contributing to thalidomide intolerability. The results showed the overall response rates in all patients and the evaluable patients were 78.5% and 98.7%, respectively. The median PFS in the study cohort was not reached. The most common thalidomide-related AEs were constipation (32.3%) and skin rash (23.7%), resulting in dose reduction and discontinuation rates of 22.6% and 21.5%, respectively. The responders had a significantly higher average thalidomide dose intensity than the nonresponders (88.6% vs. 42.9%, p < .001).
The thalidomide dose step-up approach is a viable option for patients with NDMM receiving VTD induction therapy with satisfactory efficacy and tolerability. However, thalidomide intolerance may lead to dose reduction or discontinuation due to unpredictable AEs, leading to lower dose intensity and potentially inferior treatment outcomes. In addition to a dose step-up strategy, optimal supportive care is critical for patients with multiple myeloma receiving VTD induction therapy.
含沙利度胺的方案会引起不良反应(AE),这可能需要降低多发性骨髓瘤患者的治疗强度,甚至停止治疗。由于沙利度胺的毒性是剂量依赖性的,因此确定每个患者的最佳剂量至关重要。
本研究旨在探讨沙利度胺剂量递增策略对治疗反应和无进展生存期(PFS)的影响。
本前瞻性观察性研究纳入了 93 例新诊断的多发性骨髓瘤(NDMM)患者,他们接受硼替佐米、沙利度胺和地塞米松(VTD)治疗。本研究评估了沙利度胺剂量减少和停药的发生率、总剂量强度及其对治疗效果的影响。此外,本研究还使用 Cox 比例风险模型分析了导致沙利度胺不耐受的因素。结果显示,所有患者和可评价患者的总缓解率分别为 78.5%和 98.7%。研究队列的中位 PFS 未达到。最常见的沙利度胺相关不良反应是便秘(32.3%)和皮疹(23.7%),导致剂量减少和停药的发生率分别为 22.6%和 21.5%。应答者的沙利度胺平均剂量强度明显高于无应答者(88.6% vs. 42.9%,p<0.001)。
对于接受 VTD 诱导治疗的 NDMM 患者,沙利度胺剂量递增方法是一种可行的选择,具有令人满意的疗效和耐受性。然而,由于不可预测的不良反应,沙利度胺不耐受可能导致剂量减少或停药,导致剂量强度降低,治疗效果可能不理想。除了剂量递增策略外,对于接受 VTD 诱导治疗的多发性骨髓瘤患者,最佳的支持性护理至关重要。