Suppr超能文献

抗氧化剂补充治疗镰状细胞病。

Antioxidant supplementation for sickle cell disease.

机构信息

Department of Haematology & Blood Transfusion Medicine, Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria.

Department of Medical Laboratory Science, Achievers University, Owo, Nigeria.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 22;5(5):CD013590. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013590.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sickle cell disease (SCD) refers to a group of genetic disorders characterized by the presence of an abnormal haemoglobin molecule called haemoglobin S (HbS). When subjected to oxidative stress from low oxygen concentrations, HbS molecules form rigid polymers, giving the red cell the typical sickle shape. Antioxidants have been shown to reduce oxidative stress and improve outcomes in other diseases associated with oxidative stress. Therefore, it is important to review and synthesize the available evidence on the effect of antioxidants on the clinical outcomes of people with SCD.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of antioxidant supplementation for improving health outcomes in people with SCD.

SEARCH METHODS

We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was 15 August 2023.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials comparing antioxidant supplementation to placebo, other antioxidants, or different doses of antioxidants, in people with SCD.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data, assessed the risk of bias and certainty of the evidence, and reported according to Cochrane methodological procedures.

MAIN RESULTS

The review included 1609 participants in 26 studies, with 17 comparisons. We rated 13 studies as having a high risk of bias overall, and 13 studies as having an unclear risk of bias overall due to study limitations. We used GRADE to rate the certainty of evidence. Only eight studies reported on our important outcomes at six months. Vitamin C (1400 mg) plus vitamin E (800 mg) versus placebo Based on evidence from one study in 83 participants, vitamin C (1400 mg) plus vitamin E (800 mg) may not be better than placebo at reducing the frequency of crisis (risk ratio (RR) 1.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64 to 2.18), the severity of pain (RR 1.33, 95% CI 0.40 to 4.37), or adverse effects (AE), of which the most common were headache, nausea, fatigue, diarrhoea, and epigastric pain (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.00). Vitamin C plus vitamin E may increase the risk of SCD-related complications (acute chest syndrome: RR 2.66, 95% CI 0.77 to 9.13; 1 study, 83 participants), and increase haemoglobin level (median (interquartile range) 90 (81 to 96) g/L versus 93.5 (84 to 105) g/L) (1 study, 83 participants) compared to placebo. However, the evidence for all the above effects is very uncertain. The study did not report on quality of life (QoL) of participants and their caregivers, nor on frequency of hospitalization. Zinc versus placebo Zinc may not be better than placebo at reducing the frequency of crisis at six months (rate ratio 0.62, 95% CI 0.17 to 2.29; 1 study, 36 participants; low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain whether zinc is better than placebo at improving sickle cell-related complications (complete healing of leg ulcers at six months: RR 2.00, 95% CI 0.60 to 6.72; 1 study, 34 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Zinc may be better than placebo at increasing haemoglobin level (g/dL) (MD 1.26, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.26; 1 study, 36 participants; low-certainty evidence). The study did not report on severity of pain, QoL, AE, and frequency of hospitalization. N-acetylcysteine versus placebo N-acetylcysteine (NAC) 1200 mg may not be better than placebo at reducing the frequency of crisis in SCD, reported as pain days (rate ratio 0.99 days, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.84; 1 study, 96 participants; low-certainty evidence). Low-certainty evidence from one study (96 participants) suggests NAC (1200 mg) may not be better than placebo at reducing the severity of pain (MD 0.17, 95% CI -0.53 to 0.87). Compared to placebo, NAC (1200 mg) may not be better at improving physical QoL (MD -1.80, 95% CI -5.01 to 1.41) and mental QoL (MD 2.00, 95% CI -1.45 to 5.45; very low-certainty evidence), reducing the risk of adverse effects (gastrointestinal complaints, pruritus, or rash) (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.14; low-certainty evidence), reducing the frequency of hospitalizations (rate ratio 0.98, 95% CI 0.41 to 2.38; low-certainty evidence), and sickle cell-related complications (RR 5.00, 95% CI 0.25 to 101.48; very low-certainty evidence), or increasing haemoglobin level (MD -0.18 g/dL, 95% CI -0.40 to 0.04; low-certainty evidence). L-arginine versus placebo L-arginine may not be better than placebo at reducing the frequency of crisis (monthly pain) (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.95; 1 study, 50 participants; low-certainty evidence). However, L-arginine may be better than placebo at reducing the severity of pain (MD -1.41, 95% CI -1.65 to -1.18; 2 studies, 125 participants; low-certainty evidence). One participant allocated to L-arginine developed hives during infusion of L-arginine, another experienced acute clinical deterioration, and a participant in the placebo group had clinically relevant increases in liver function enzymes. The evidence is very uncertain whether L-arginine is better at reducing the mean number of days in hospital compared to placebo (MD -0.85 days, 95% CI -1.87 to 0.17; 2 studies, 125 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Also, L-arginine may not be better than placebo at increasing haemoglobin level (MD 0.4 g/dL, 95% CI -0.50 to 1.3; 2 studies, 106 participants; low-certainty evidence). No study in this comparison reported on QoL and sickle cell-related complications. Omega-3 versus placebo Very low-certainty evidence shows no evidence of a difference in the risk of adverse effects of omega-3 compared to placebo (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.48; 1 study, 67 participants). Very low-certainty evidence suggests that omega-3 may not be better than placebo at increasing haemoglobin level (MD 0.36 g/L, 95% CI -0.21 to 0.93; 1 study, 67 participants). The study did not report on frequency of crisis, severity of pain, QoL, frequency of hospitalization, and sickle cell-related complications.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There was inconsistent evidence on all outcomes to draw conclusions on the beneficial and harmful effects of antioxidants. However, L-arginine may be better than placebo at reducing the severity of pain at six months, and zinc may be better than placebo at increasing haemoglobin level. We are uncertain whether other antioxidants are beneficial for SCD. Larger studies conducted on each comparison would reduce the current uncertainties.

摘要

背景

镰状细胞病 (SCD) 是一组遗传性疾病,其特征是存在一种称为血红蛋白 S (HbS) 的异常血红蛋白分子。当受到低氧浓度引起的氧化应激时,HS 分子形成刚性聚合物,使红细胞呈现典型的镰状。抗氧化剂已被证明可减轻与氧化应激相关的其他疾病的氧化应激并改善其结果。因此,有必要回顾和综合现有证据,以评估抗氧化剂对 SCD 患者临床结局的影响。

目的

评估抗氧化剂补充剂在改善 SCD 患者健康结局方面的有效性和安全性。

检索方法

我们使用了标准的、广泛的 Cochrane 检索方法。最新检索日期为 2023 年 8 月 15 日。

选择标准

我们纳入了比较抗氧化剂补充剂与安慰剂、其他抗氧化剂或不同剂量抗氧化剂的随机和准随机对照试验,纳入了 SCD 患者。

数据收集和分析

两位作者独立提取数据,评估偏倚风险和证据确定性,并按照 Cochrane 方法学程序报告。

主要结果

该综述纳入了 26 项研究的 1609 名参与者,共 17 项比较。我们将 13 项研究评为总体高偏倚风险,13 项研究总体上评为偏倚风险不确定,原因是研究存在局限性。我们使用 GRADE 对证据确定性进行评级。只有 8 项研究在 6 个月时报告了我们的重要结局。

维生素 C(1400mg)加维生素 E(800mg)与安慰剂:基于一项纳入 83 名参与者的研究证据,维生素 C(1400mg)加维生素 E(800mg)与安慰剂相比,可能并不能更好地降低危机发生的频率(风险比[RR]1.18,95%置信区间[CI]0.64 至 2.18)、疼痛严重程度(RR1.33,95%CI0.40 至 4.37)或不良事件(AE),其中最常见的是头痛、恶心、疲劳、腹泻和上腹痛(RR0.56,95%CI0.31 至 1.00)。维生素 C 加维生素 E 可能会增加 SCD 相关并发症(急性胸部综合征:RR2.66,95%CI0.77 至 9.13;1 项研究,83 名参与者)和血红蛋白水平的风险(中位数[IQR]90[81 至 96]g/L 与 93.5[84 至 105]g/L)(1 项研究,83 名参与者)相比安慰剂。然而,所有这些效果的证据都非常不确定。该研究未报告参与者及其照顾者的生活质量(QoL),也未报告住院频率。

锌与安慰剂

锌与安慰剂相比,可能并不能更好地降低 6 个月时的危机发生频率(比率 0.62,95%CI0.17 至 2.29;1 项研究,36 名参与者;低确定性证据)。我们不确定锌是否比安慰剂更能改善镰状细胞相关并发症(完全愈合腿部溃疡 6 个月:RR2.00,95%CI0.60 至 6.72;1 项研究,34 名参与者;非常低确定性证据)。锌可能比安慰剂更能增加血红蛋白水平(g/dL)(MD1.26,95%CI0.44 至 1.26;1 项研究,36 名参与者;低确定性证据)。该研究未报告疼痛严重程度、QoL、AE 和住院频率。

N-乙酰半胱氨酸与安慰剂:N-乙酰半胱氨酸(NAC)1200mg 与安慰剂相比,可能并不能更好地降低 SCD 中的危机发生频率(报告为疼痛天数)(率比 0.99 天,95%CI0.53 至 1.84;1 项研究,96 名参与者;低确定性证据)。一项纳入 96 名参与者的低确定性证据表明,NAC(1200mg)与安慰剂相比,可能不能更好地降低疼痛严重程度(MD0.17,95%CI-0.53 至 0.87)。与安慰剂相比,NAC(1200mg)可能不能更好地改善身体 QoL(MD-1.80,95%CI-5.01 至 1.41)和心理 QoL(MD2.00,95%CI-1.45 至 5.45;非常低确定性证据),降低不良事件(胃肠道不适、瘙痒或皮疹)的风险(RR0.92,95%CI0.75 至 1.14;低确定性证据),降低住院频率(率比 0.98,95%CI0.41 至 2.38;低确定性证据)和镰状细胞相关并发症(RR5.00,95%CI0.25 至 101.48;非常低确定性证据),或增加血红蛋白水平(MD-0.18g/dL,95%CI-0.40 至 0.04;低确定性证据)。

L-精氨酸与安慰剂:L-精氨酸可能并不比安慰剂更能降低危机发生频率(每月疼痛)(RR0.71,95%CI0.26 至 1.95;1 项研究,50 名参与者;低确定性证据)。然而,L-精氨酸可能比安慰剂更能降低疼痛严重程度(MD-1.41,95%CI-1.65 至 -1.18;2 项研究,125 名参与者;低确定性证据)。一名分配到 L-精氨酸的参与者在输注 L-精氨酸时出现荨麻疹,另一名参与者出现急性临床恶化,一名安慰剂组的参与者出现肝酶临床相关升高。证据非常不确定 L-精氨酸是否比安慰剂更能减少与住院相关的平均天数(MD-0.85 天,95%CI-1.87 至 0.17;2 项研究,125 名参与者;非常低确定性证据)。此外,L-精氨酸可能不比安慰剂更能增加血红蛋白水平(MD0.4g/dL,95%CI-0.50 至 1.3;2 项研究,106 名参与者;低确定性证据)。比较中没有研究报告 QoL 和镰状细胞相关并发症。

ω-3 与安慰剂:非常低确定性证据表明,与安慰剂相比,ω-3 没有增加不良事件的风险(RR1.05,95%CI0.74 至 1.48;1 项研究,67 名参与者)。非常低确定性证据表明,ω-3 可能不比安慰剂更能增加血红蛋白水平(MD0.36g/L,95%CI-0.21 至 0.93;1 项研究,67 名参与者)。该研究未报告危机发生频率、疼痛严重程度、QoL、住院频率和镰状细胞相关并发症。

作者结论

对于所有结局,证据都存在不一致,无法得出抗氧化剂有益或有害的结论。然而,L-精氨酸可能在 6 个月时降低疼痛严重程度,锌可能增加血红蛋白水平。我们不确定其他抗氧化剂是否对 SCD 有益。如果进行更多的每项比较的研究,将会减少目前的不确定性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7519/11110109/8845434c6703/tCD013590-FIG-01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验