• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在骨科手术摘要中使用宣传性语言的增加——对 1985 年至 2020 年 112916 篇摘要的分析。

Increasing Use of Promotional Language in Orthopaedic Surgery Abstracts-An Analysis of 112,916 Abstracts 1985 to 2020.

机构信息

From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.

出版信息

J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2024 May 22;8(5). doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00109. eCollection 2024 May 1.

DOI:10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00109
PMID:38775596
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11111393/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Increasing use of "hype" language (eg, language overstating research impact) has been documented in the scientific community. Evaluating language in abstracts is important because readers may use abstracts to extrapolate findings to entire publications. Our purpose was to assess the frequency of hype language within orthopaedic surgery.

METHODS

One hundred thirty-nine hype adjectives were previously identified using a linguistics approach. All publicly available abstracts from 18 orthopaedic surgery journals between 1985 and 2020 were obtained, and hype adjectives were tabulated. Change in frequency of these adjectives was calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 112,916 abstracts were identified. 67.0% (948/1414) of abstracts in 1985 contained hype adjectives, compared with 92.5% (5287/5714) in 2020. The average number of hype adjectives per abstract increased by 136% (1.1 to 2.6). Of the 139 adjectives, 87 (62.5%) increased in frequency and 40 (28.7%) decreased in frequency while 12 (9%) were not used. The hype adjectives with the largest absolute increases in frequency were quality (+324wpm), significant (+320wpm), systematic (+246wpm), top (+239wpm), and international (+201wpm). The five hype adjectives with the largest relative increases in frequency were novel (+10500%), international (+2850%), urgent (+2600%), robust (+2300%), and emerging (+1400%).

CONCLUSION

Promotional language is increasing in orthopaedic surgery abstracts. Authors, editors, and reviewers should seek to minimize the usage of nonobjective language.

摘要

背景

在科学界已经记录到“炒作”语言（例如，夸大研究影响的语言）的使用越来越多。评估摘要中的语言很重要，因为读者可能会使用摘要来推断整篇出版物的发现。我们的目的是评估矫形外科中夸大语言的频率。

方法

使用语言学方法先前确定了 139 个夸大形容词。获取了 1985 年至 2020 年期间 18 种矫形外科杂志的所有公开摘要，并对夸大形容词进行了制表。计算了这些形容词频率的变化。

结果

共确定了 112916 个摘要。1985 年的 1414 篇摘要中有 67.0%（948/1414）包含夸大形容词，而 2020 年的 5714 篇摘要中有 92.5%（5287/5714）。每篇摘要中夸大形容词的平均数量增加了 136%（从 1.1 增加到 2.6）。在 139 个形容词中，87 个（62.5%）的频率增加，40 个（28.7%）的频率降低，而 12 个（9%）未使用。频率绝对增加最多的夸大形容词是质量（+324wpm）、显著（+320wpm）、系统（+246wpm）、最高（+239wpm）和国际（+201wpm）。频率相对增加最多的五个夸大形容词是新颖（+10500%）、国际（+2850%）、紧急（+2600%）、稳健（+2300%）和新兴（+1400%）。

结论

矫形外科摘要中的宣传语言越来越多。作者、编辑和审稿人应尽量减少使用非客观语言。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce4e/11111393/b303bef99f60/jagrr-8-e24.00109-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce4e/11111393/8504ecace2c7/jagrr-8-e24.00109-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce4e/11111393/82926f2b44c2/jagrr-8-e24.00109-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce4e/11111393/8fed2c4f6b18/jagrr-8-e24.00109-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce4e/11111393/b303bef99f60/jagrr-8-e24.00109-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce4e/11111393/8504ecace2c7/jagrr-8-e24.00109-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce4e/11111393/82926f2b44c2/jagrr-8-e24.00109-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce4e/11111393/8fed2c4f6b18/jagrr-8-e24.00109-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce4e/11111393/b303bef99f60/jagrr-8-e24.00109-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Increasing Use of Promotional Language in Orthopaedic Surgery Abstracts-An Analysis of 112,916 Abstracts 1985 to 2020.在骨科手术摘要中使用宣传性语言的增加——对 1985 年至 2020 年 112916 篇摘要的分析。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2024 May 22;8(5). doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00109. eCollection 2024 May 1.
2
Trends in the Use of Promotional Language (Hype) in Abstracts of Successful National Institutes of Health Grant Applications, 1985-2020.1985 - 2020年美国国立卫生研究院成功资助申请摘要中宣传性语言（夸张表述）的使用趋势
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2228676. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.28676.
3
Promotional Language (Hype) in Abstracts of Publications of National Institutes of Health-Funded Research, 1985-2020.1985-2020 年美国国立卫生研究院资助研究出版物摘要中的宣传性语言（夸大其词）。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Dec 1;6(12):e2348706. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.48706.
4
Use of adjectives in abstracts when reporting results of randomized, controlled trials from industry and academia.在报告来自行业和学术界的随机对照试验结果时，摘要中形容词的使用情况。
Drugs R D. 2015 Mar;15(1):85-139. doi: 10.1007/s40268-015-0085-9.
5
English publication rate of 3,205 abstracts presented at the Annual Meeting of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association and the Annual Research Meeting of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.在日本骨科学会年会和日本骨科学会年度研究会议上发表的3205篇摘要的英文发表率。
J Orthop Sci. 2013 Nov;18(6):1031-6. doi: 10.1007/s00776-013-0439-5. Epub 2013 Jul 20.
6
Barriers to full-text publication following presentation of abstracts at annual orthopaedic meetings.在骨科年会上发表摘要后全文发表的障碍。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Jan;85(1):158-63. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200301000-00024.
7
Assessment of the quality of reporting in abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in five leading Chinese medical journals.评价发表于五家中国主要医学期刊的随机对照试验摘要报告质量。
PLoS One. 2010 Aug 2;5(8):e11926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011926.
8
Publication rate of abstracts presented at the shoulder and elbow session of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgery.在美国骨科医师学会肩肘会议上发表的摘要的发表率。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Jun;467(6):1629-33. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0474-2. Epub 2008 Sep 4.
9
Publication rate of abstracts presented at European Paediatric Orthopaedic Society Annual Meetings, 2006 to 2008.2006年至2008年在欧洲小儿骨科学会年会上发表的摘要的发表率。
J Pediatr Orthop. 2014 Sep;34(6):e33-8. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000140.
10
Effect of editors' implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis.《编辑实施 CONSORT 指南对高影响力医学期刊摘要报告的影响：中断时间序列分析》
BMJ. 2012 Jun 22;344:e4178. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e4178.

引用本文的文献

1
Scientific publications that use promotional language in the abstract receive more citations and public attention.在摘要中使用宣传性语言的科学出版物会获得更多引用和公众关注。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Aug 5;3(1):118. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00293-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Hype, the Responsibility of Authors and Editors, and the Subjective Interpretation of Evidence.炒作、作者与编辑的责任以及对证据的主观解读
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Dec 1;6(12):e2349125. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.49125.
2
Promotional Language (Hype) in Abstracts of Publications of National Institutes of Health-Funded Research, 1985-2020.1985-2020 年美国国立卫生研究院资助研究出版物摘要中的宣传性语言（夸大其词）。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Dec 1;6(12):e2348706. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.48706.
3
Trends in the Use of Promotional Language (Hype) in National Institutes of Health Funding Opportunity Announcements, 1992-2020.
1992 - 2020年美国国立卫生研究院资助机会公告中宣传性语言（夸张表述）的使用趋势
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Nov 1;5(11):e2243221. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.43221.
4
The scientific communication ecosystem: the responsibility of investigators.科学传播生态系统：研究者的责任
Lancet. 2022 Oct 15;400(10360):1289-1290. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01898-0.
5
Trends in the Use of Promotional Language (Hype) in Abstracts of Successful National Institutes of Health Grant Applications, 1985-2020.1985 - 2020年美国国立卫生研究院成功资助申请摘要中宣传性语言（夸张表述）的使用趋势
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2228676. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.28676.
6
An analysis of publication trends of orthopedic surgery residency graduates in relation to academic achievement.分析与学术成就相关的骨科住院医师毕业生的发表趋势。
J Osteopath Med. 2022 Jan 27;122(4):195-202. doi: 10.1515/jom-2021-0196.
7
The Orthopaedic Match: Defining the Academic Profile of Successful Candidates.《矫形外科匹配：定义成功候选人的学术概况》
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021 Nov 1;29(21):921-928. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-00727.
8
Medical Student Research Productivity: Which Variables are Associated with Matching to a Highly Ranked Orthopaedic Residency Program?医学生的研究产出：哪些变量与匹配到高排名的骨科住院医师培训项目相关？
J Surg Educ. 2021 Mar-Apr;78(2):512-518. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.08.024. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
9
Level and Prevalence of Spin in Published Cardiovascular Randomized Clinical Trial Reports With Statistically Nonsignificant Primary Outcomes: A Systematic Review.发表的心血管随机临床试验报告中具有统计学无显著性主要结局的旋转水平和流行率：系统评价。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3;2(5):e192622. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.2622.
10
Physician characteristics associated with proper assessment of overstated conclusions in research abstracts: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.与正确评估研究摘要中夸大结论相关的医生特征：一项随机对照试验的二次分析
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 25;14(1):e0211206. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211206. eCollection 2019.