• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用标准化声音集来帮助描述恐音症:国际情感数字化声音。

Using a standardized sound set to help characterize misophonia: The International Affective Digitized Sounds.

机构信息

Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.

Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 May 22;19(5):e0301105. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301105. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0301105
PMID:38776286
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11111082/
Abstract

Misophonia is a condition characterized by negative affect, intolerance, and functional impairment in response to particular repetitive sounds usually made by others (e.g., chewing, sniffing, pen tapping) and associated stimuli. To date, researchers have largely studied misophonia using self-report measures. As the field is quickly expanding, assessment approaches need to advance to include more objective measures capable of differentiating those with and without misophonia. Although several studies have used sounds as experimental stimuli, few have used standardized stimuli sets with demonstrated reliability or validity. To conduct rigorous research in an effort to better understand misophonia, it is important to have an easily accessible, standardized set of acoustic stimuli for use across studies. Accordingly, in the present study, the International Affective Digitized Sounds (IADS-2), developed by Bradley and Lang (Bradley MM et al., 2007), were used to determine whether participants with misophonia responded to certain standardized sounds differently than a control group. Participants were 377 adults (132 participants with misophonia and 245 controls) recruited from an online platform to complete several questionnaires and respond to four probes (arousal, valence, similarity to personally-relevant aversive sounds, and sound avoidance) in response to normed pleasant, unpleasant, and neutral IADS-2 sounds. Findings indicated that compared to controls, participants with high misophonia symptoms rated pleasant and neutral sounds as significantly more (a) arousing and similar to trigger sounds in their everyday life, (b) unpleasant and (c) likely to be avoided in everyday life. For future scientific and clinical innovation, we include a ranked list of IADS-2 stimuli differentiating responses in those with and without misophonia, which we call the IADS-M.

摘要

恐音症是一种以对特定重复声音(例如咀嚼、嗅探、笔尖敲击声)和相关刺激产生的负面情绪、无法容忍和功能障碍为特征的病症。迄今为止,研究人员主要使用自我报告的测量方法来研究恐音症。随着该领域的迅速发展,评估方法需要改进,以包括更能区分有和没有恐音症的人更客观的测量方法。尽管有几项研究使用声音作为实验刺激,但很少有研究使用具有可靠性或有效性的标准化刺激集。为了开展严谨的研究,努力更好地理解恐音症,拥有一套易于获取、标准化的声学刺激集对于跨研究使用非常重要。因此,在本研究中,使用了由 Bradley 和 Lang 开发的国际情感数字化声音(IADS-2)(Bradley MM 等人,2007 年),以确定患有恐音症的参与者是否对某些标准化声音的反应与对照组不同。参与者为 377 名成年人(132 名患有恐音症的参与者和 245 名对照组),他们从一个在线平台招募,以完成几个问卷,并对四个探针(唤醒度、效价、与个人相关的厌恶声音的相似性以及声音回避)做出反应,以响应规范的愉快、不愉快和中性 IADS-2 声音。研究结果表明,与对照组相比,高恐音症症状参与者将愉快和中性声音评定为明显(a)更唤醒和类似于日常生活中的触发声音,(b)更不愉快,以及(c)更有可能在日常生活中回避。为了未来的科学和临床创新,我们包括了一个 IADS-2 刺激的排序列表,区分了有和没有恐音症的人的反应,我们称之为 IADS-M。

相似文献

1
Using a standardized sound set to help characterize misophonia: The International Affective Digitized Sounds.使用标准化声音集来帮助描述恐音症:国际情感数字化声音。
PLoS One. 2024 May 22;19(5):e0301105. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301105. eCollection 2024.
2
Affective auditory stimuli: adaptation of the International Affective Digitized Sounds (IADS-2) for European Portuguese.情感听觉刺激:国际情感数字化声音 (IADS-2) 适配欧洲葡萄牙语。
Behav Res Methods. 2013 Dec;45(4):1168-81. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0310-1.
3
Does context matter in misophonia? A multi-method experimental investigation.在恐音症中,情境重要吗?一项多方法实验研究。
Front Neurosci. 2023 Jan 4;16:880853. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.880853. eCollection 2022.
4
A psychoacoustic test for misophonia assessment.一种用于评估恐音症的听觉心理学测试。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 26;11(1):11044. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90355-8.
5
The Motor Basis for Misophonia.听觉厌恶症的运动基础。
J Neurosci. 2021 Jun 30;41(26):5762-5770. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0261-21.2021. Epub 2021 May 21.
6
What sound sources trigger misophonia? Not just chewing and breathing.哪些声源会引发恐音症?不只是咀嚼和呼吸声。
J Clin Psychol. 2021 Nov;77(11):2609-2625. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23196. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
7
Affective ratings of sound stimuli.声音刺激的情感评分。
Behav Res Methods. 2008 Aug;40(3):784-90. doi: 10.3758/brm.40.3.784.
8
Development and Evaluation of a Sound-Swapped Video Database for Misophonia.针对恐音症的声音交换视频数据库的开发与评估
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 22;13:890829. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.890829. eCollection 2022.
9
[The International Affective Digitized Sounds (IADS): Spanish norms].[国际情感数字化声音(IADS):西班牙语常模]
Psicothema. 2008 Feb;20(1):104-13.
10
Specificity of Affective Responses in Misophonia Depends on Trigger Identification.恐音症中情感反应的特异性取决于触发因素的识别。
Front Neurosci. 2022 May 26;16:879583. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.879583. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Does context matter in misophonia? A multi-method experimental investigation.在恐音症中,情境重要吗?一项多方法实验研究。
Front Neurosci. 2023 Jan 4;16:880853. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.880853. eCollection 2022.
2
Development and Evaluation of a Sound-Swapped Video Database for Misophonia.针对恐音症的声音交换视频数据库的开发与评估
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 22;13:890829. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.890829. eCollection 2022.
3
Identification of Everyday Sounds Affects Their Pleasantness.对日常声音的识别会影响其愉悦感。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 8;13:894034. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.894034. eCollection 2022.
4
Consensus Definition of Misophonia: A Delphi Study.恐音症的共识定义:一项德尔菲研究。
Front Neurosci. 2022 Mar 17;16:841816. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.841816. eCollection 2022.
5
Attention, flexibility, and imagery in misophonia: Does attention exacerbate everyday disliking of sound?听觉过敏中的注意力、灵活性和意象:注意力是否会加剧对声音的日常反感?
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2021 Dec;43(10):1006-1017. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2022.2056581. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
6
Development and Initial Validation of the Duke Misophonia Questionnaire.《杜克氏恐音症问卷》的编制与初步验证
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 29;12:709928. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.709928. eCollection 2021.
7
Sounds of Silence in Times of COVID-19: Distress and Loss of Cardiac Coherence in People With Misophonia Caused by Real, Imagined or Evoked Triggering Sounds.新冠疫情时期的寂静之声:对恐音症患者而言,真实、想象或诱发的触发声音所导致的痛苦与心脏连贯性丧失
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 30;12:638949. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.638949. eCollection 2021.
8
What sound sources trigger misophonia? Not just chewing and breathing.哪些声源会引发恐音症?不只是咀嚼和呼吸声。
J Clin Psychol. 2021 Nov;77(11):2609-2625. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23196. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
9
A psychoacoustic test for misophonia assessment.一种用于评估恐音症的听觉心理学测试。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 26;11(1):11044. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90355-8.
10
The Motor Basis for Misophonia.听觉厌恶症的运动基础。
J Neurosci. 2021 Jun 30;41(26):5762-5770. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0261-21.2021. Epub 2021 May 21.