Zoric Andreas, Bagheri Mahsa, von Kohout Maria, Fardoust Tara, Fuchs Paul C, Schiefer Jennifer L, Opländer Christian
Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, RKH Hospital Bietigheim-Vaihingen, Bietigheim-Bissingen, Germany.
Department of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Hand Surgery, HELIOS Hospital Emil von Behring, Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2024 May;42(5):356-365. doi: 10.1089/photob.2023.0180.
Nosocomial wound infection with (PA) is a serious complication often responsible for the septic mortality of burn patients. High-intensity antimicrobial blue light (aBL) treatment may represent an alternative therapy for PA infections and will be investigated in this study. Antibacterial effects of a light-emitting diode array (450-460 nm; 300 mW/cm; 15/30 min; 270/540 J/cm) against PA were determined by suspension assay, biofilm assay, and a human skin wound model and compared with 15-min topically applied 3% citric acid (CA) and wound irrigation solution (Prontosan; PRT). aBL reduced the bacterial number [2.51-3.56 log colony-forming unit (CFU)/mL], whereas PRT or CA treatment achieved a 4.64 or 6.60 log CFU/mL reduction in suspension assays. aBL reduced biofilm formation by 60-66%. PRT or CA treatment showed reductions by 25% or 13%. Here, aBL reduced bacterial number in biofilms (1.30-1.64 log CFU), but to a lower extend than PRT (2.41 log CFU) or CA (2.48 log CFU). In the wound skin model, aBL (2.21-2.33 log CFU) showed a bacterial reduction of the same magnitude as PRT (2.26 log CFU) and CA (2.30 log CFU). aBL showed a significant antibacterial efficacy against PA and biofilm formation in a short time. However, a clinical application of aBL in wound therapy requires effective active skin cooling and eye protection, which in turn may limit clinical implementation.
铜绿假单胞菌(PA)引起的医院获得性伤口感染是一种严重并发症,常导致烧伤患者发生败血症死亡。高强度抗菌蓝光(aBL)治疗可能是治疗PA感染的一种替代疗法,本研究将对此进行调查。通过悬液试验、生物膜试验和人体皮肤伤口模型测定发光二极管阵列(450 - 460纳米;300毫瓦/平方厘米;15/30分钟;270/540焦/平方厘米)对PA的抗菌效果,并与局部应用15分钟的3%柠檬酸(CA)和伤口冲洗液(普朗托散;PRT)进行比较。aBL可减少细菌数量[2.51 - 3.56 log菌落形成单位(CFU)/毫升],而在悬液试验中,PRT或CA治疗可使细菌数量减少4.64或6.60 log CFU/毫升。aBL可使生物膜形成减少60 - 66%。PRT或CA治疗分别使生物膜形成减少25%或13%。在此,aBL可减少生物膜中的细菌数量(1.30 - 1.6 log CFU),但减少程度低于PRT(2.41 log CFU)或CA(2.48 log CFU)。在伤口皮肤模型中,aBL(2.21 - 2.33 log CFU)显示出与PRT(2.26 log CFU)和CA(2.30 log CFU)相同程度的细菌减少。aBL在短时间内对PA和生物膜形成显示出显著的抗菌效果。然而,aBL在伤口治疗中的临床应用需要有效的皮肤主动冷却和眼部保护,这反过来可能会限制其临床应用。