Wellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, Massachusetts, 02114.
Vaccine and Immunotherapy Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 149 13th St, Charlestown, Boston, Massachusetts, 02129.
Lasers Surg Med. 2020 Jun;52(5):472-478. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23159. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
Biofilms cause more than 80% of infections in humans, including more than 90% of all chronic wound infections and are extremely resistant to antimicrobials and the immune system. The situation is exacerbated by the fast spreading of antimicrobial resistance, which has become one of the biggest threats to current public health. There is consequently a critical need for the development of alternative therapeutics. Antimicrobial blue light (aBL) is a light-based approach that exhibits intrinsic antimicrobial effect without the involvement of exogenous photosensitizers. In this study, we investigated the antimicrobial effect of this non-antibiotic approach against biofilms formed by microbial isolates of multidrug-resistant bacteria.
STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: Microbial isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii, Candida albicans, Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, MRSA, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Proteus mirabilis were studied. Biofilms were grown in microtiter plates for 24 or 48 hours or in the CDC biofilm reactor for 48 hours and exposed to aBL at 405 nm (60 mW/cm , 60 or 30 minutes). The anti-biofilm activity of aBL was measured by viable counts.
The biofilms of A. baumannii, N. gonorrhoeae, and P. aeruginosa were the most susceptible to aBL with between 4 and 8 log inactivation after 108 J/cm (60 mW/cm , 30 minutes) or 216 J/cm (60 mW/cm , 60 minutes) aBL were delivered in the microplates. On the contrary, the biofilms of C. albicans, E. coli, E. faecalis, and P. mirabilis were the least susceptible to aBL inactivation (-0.30, -0.24, -0.84, and -0.68 log inactivation, respectively). The same aBL treatment in biofilms developed in the CDC biofilm reactor, caused -1.68 log inactivation in A. baumannii and -1.74 and -1.65 log inactivation in two different strains of P. aeruginosa.
aBL exhibits potential against pathogenic microorganisms and could help with the significant need for new antimicrobials in clinical practice to manage multidrug-resistant infections. Lasers Surg. Med. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
生物膜可导致 80%以上的人类感染,包括 90%以上的慢性伤口感染,并且对抗生素和免疫系统具有极强的抵抗力。抗生素耐药性的迅速传播使情况更加恶化,这已成为当前公共卫生的最大威胁之一。因此,迫切需要开发替代疗法。抗菌蓝光(aBL)是一种基于光的方法,无需使用外源性光敏剂即可发挥内在的抗菌作用。在这项研究中,我们研究了这种非抗生素方法对多药耐药细菌分离株形成的生物膜的抗菌作用。
研究设计/材料和方法:研究了鲍曼不动杆菌、白色念珠菌、大肠杆菌、粪肠球菌、MRSA、淋病奈瑟菌、铜绿假单胞菌和奇异变形杆菌的微生物分离株。生物膜在微量滴定板中培养 24 或 48 小时或在 CDC 生物膜反应器中培养 48 小时,然后用 405nm 的 aBL(60mW/cm ,60 或 30 分钟)照射。通过活菌计数测量 aBL 的抗生物膜活性。
鲍曼不动杆菌、淋病奈瑟菌和铜绿假单胞菌的生物膜对 aBL 最敏感,在微量滴定板中用 108 J/cm(60 mW/cm,30 分钟)或 216 J/cm(60 mW/cm,60 分钟)的 aBL 处理后,生物膜的失活率分别为 4 至 8 对数。相反,白色念珠菌、大肠杆菌、粪肠球菌和奇异变形杆菌的生物膜对 aBL 失活的抵抗力最低(分别为-0.30、-0.24、-0.84 和-0.68 对数失活)。在 CDC 生物膜反应器中形成的生物膜中进行相同的 aBL 处理,可使鲍曼不动杆菌的失活率降低 1.68 对数,两种不同的铜绿假单胞菌菌株的失活率降低 1.74 和 1.65 对数。
aBL 对病原微生物具有潜在的作用,可能有助于满足临床实践中对新抗生素的迫切需求,以治疗多药耐药感染。《激光外科学杂志》。© 2019 年 Wiley 期刊,Inc.