Hinojosa-Gonzalez David E, Talamas Mendoza Alejandro, Torres-Martinez Mauricio, Diaz-Garza Karla, Hernandez Beatriz S, Muñoz Hibert Monica Isabel, Ramirez-Mulhern Isabela, Morales Palomino Kimberly Lizet, Gonzalez-Oyervides Roberto
Tecnologico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Ave Morones Prieto 3000, Monterrey, NL, 64000, Mexico.
Scott Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Apr;37(4):278-287. doi: 10.1038/s41443-024-00910-w. Epub 2024 May 23.
Shockwaves are thought to activate regenerative and angiogenic pathways, providing a possible therapeutic benefit for patients with erectile dysfunction. This study aimed to analyze the effectiveness of low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy energy density and pulse frequency. In May 2022, a systematic search of online databases was performed to identify randomized clinical trials related to low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy in erectile dysfunction. Eligible articles compared low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy to controls or sham procedures. A Bayesian framework with 200,000 Markov chains was performed. We included a total of 1272 patients from 18 studies. The energy flux density measured in joules included 0.09 mJ/mm (mean difference 3.2 IIEF [95% CrI 2.8, 3.6]), 0.15 mJ/mm (mean difference 4.9 IIEF [95% CrI 2.8, 7.2]) and 0.20 mJ/mm (mean difference 1.2 IIEF [95% CrI 0.11, 2.3]). Of these, 0.15 mJ/mm had the greatest ranking (SUCRA = 0.983) compared with placebo. When analyzed by pulse frequency, significant increases were found in 500 pulses/session (mean difference 2.5 IIEF [CrI 1.9, 3.2]), 1500 pulses/session (mean difference 4.6 IIEF [95% CrI 3.9, 5.4]) and > 3000 pulses/session (mean difference 3.1 IIEF [95% CrI 2.1, 4.2]). Of these, 1500 pulses/session had the highest SUCRA, at 0.996. Our network meta-analysis suggests that low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy is an effective intervention for erectile dysfunction, as measured by increases in the IIEF-EF. Sessions featuring 1500 pulses and an energy flux density of 0.15 mJ/mm appear to be the most effective.
冲击波被认为可激活再生和血管生成途径,这为勃起功能障碍患者提供了一种可能的治疗益处。本研究旨在分析低强度体外冲击波疗法的能量密度和脉冲频率的有效性。2022年5月,对在线数据库进行了系统检索,以识别与低强度体外冲击波疗法治疗勃起功能障碍相关的随机临床试验。符合条件的文章将低强度体外冲击波疗法与对照组或假手术进行了比较。采用了具有200,000个马尔可夫链的贝叶斯框架。我们共纳入了18项研究中的1272名患者。以焦耳为单位测量的能量通量密度包括0.09 mJ/mm(平均差异3.2国际勃起功能指数[95%可信区间2.8, 3.6])、0.15 mJ/mm(平均差异4.9国际勃起功能指数[95%可信区间2.8, 7.2])和0.20 mJ/mm(平均差异1.2国际勃起功能指数[95%可信区间0.11, 2.3])。其中,与安慰剂相比,0.15 mJ/mm的排序最高(累积排序曲线下面积 = 0.983)。按脉冲频率分析时,发现500次脉冲/疗程(平均差异2.5国际勃起功能指数[可信区间1.9, 3.2])、1500次脉冲/疗程(平均差异4.6国际勃起功能指数[95%可信区间3.9, 5.4])和>3000次脉冲/疗程(平均差异3.1国际勃起功能指数[95%可信区间2.1, 4.2])有显著增加。其中,1500次脉冲/疗程的累积排序曲线下面积最高,为0.996。我们的网络荟萃分析表明,以国际勃起功能指数-勃起功能域(IIEF-EF)的增加来衡量,低强度体外冲击波疗法是治疗勃起功能障碍的有效干预措施。以1500次脉冲和0.15 mJ/mm的能量通量密度为特征的疗程似乎是最有效的。