• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生对静脉注射抗生素时液体量的认知:一项基于结构化访谈的研究。

Physician awareness of fluid volume administered with intravenous antibiotics: a structured interview-based study.

作者信息

Aghaie Jaleh, Lisby Marianne, Jessen Marie Kristine

机构信息

Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2025 Mar;12(1):66-75. doi: 10.15441/ceem.24.219. Epub 2024 May 23.

DOI:10.15441/ceem.24.219
PMID:38778490
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12010794/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Fluids administered as drug diluents with intravenous (IV) medicine constitute a substantial fraction of fluids in inpatients. Whether physicians are aware of fluid volumes administered with IV antibiotics for patients with suspected infections is unclear. Moreover, whether this leads to adjustments in 24-hour fluid administration/antibiotics is unknown.

METHODS

This cross-sectional interview-based study was conducted in three emergency departments. Physicians were interviewed after prescribing around-the-clock IV antibiotics for ≥24 hours to patients with suspected infection. A structured interview guide assessed the physicians' awareness, considerations, and practices when prescribing IV antibiotics. The 24-hour antibiotic fluid volume was calculated.

RESULTS

We interviewed 100 physicians. The 24-hour fluid volume administered with IV antibiotics was 400 mL (interquartile range, 300-400 mL). Overall, 53 physicians (53%) were unaware of the fluid volume administered with IV antibiotics. Moreover, 76 (76%) did not account for the antibiotic fluid volume in the 24-hour fluid administration, and 96 (96%) indicated that they would not adjust prescribed fluids after receiving information about 24-hour antibiotic fluid volume administered for their patient. No comorbidities associated with fluid intolerance were the primary reason for not adjusting prescribed fluids/ antibiotics. Approximately 79 (79%) opted for visibility of fluid volumes administered with IV antibiotics in the medical record.

CONCLUSION

The majority of physicians were unaware of fluid volumes administered as a drug diluent with IV antibiotics. The majority chose not to make post-prescribing adjustments to their planned fluid administration; they regarded their patient as fluid tolerant. The physicians opted for visibility of fluid volumes administered as diluents during the prescribing process.

摘要

目的

作为静脉注射药物稀释剂使用的液体在住院患者所使用的液体中占很大比例。尚不清楚医生是否知晓给疑似感染患者静脉注射抗生素时所使用的液体量。此外,这是否会导致24小时液体输注量/抗生素使用量的调整尚不清楚。

方法

这项基于访谈的横断面研究在三个急诊科进行。在为疑似感染患者开具持续静脉注射抗生素≥24小时后,对医生进行访谈。一份结构化访谈指南评估了医生在开具静脉注射抗生素时的知晓情况、考虑因素和做法。计算24小时抗生素液体量。

结果

我们访谈了100名医生。静脉注射抗生素时24小时的液体量为400毫升(四分位间距,300 - 400毫升)。总体而言,53名医生(53%)不知道静脉注射抗生素时的液体量。此外,76名(76%)医生在24小时液体输注中未考虑抗生素液体量,96名(96%)医生表示在收到关于其患者24小时抗生素液体量的信息后不会调整所开具的液体量。没有与液体不耐受相关的合并症是不调整所开具的液体量/抗生素的主要原因。大约79名(79%)医生选择在病历中显示静脉注射抗生素时的液体量。

结论

大多数医生不知道作为静脉注射抗生素稀释剂使用的液体量。大多数医生选择在开具处方后不对计划的液体输注进行调整;他们认为自己的患者能够耐受液体。医生们选择在开具处方过程中显示作为稀释剂使用的液体量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0139/12010794/bbb639e9568b/ceem-24-219f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0139/12010794/2dafe3595a40/ceem-24-219f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0139/12010794/a0d7a14b5414/ceem-24-219f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0139/12010794/bbb639e9568b/ceem-24-219f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0139/12010794/2dafe3595a40/ceem-24-219f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0139/12010794/a0d7a14b5414/ceem-24-219f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0139/12010794/bbb639e9568b/ceem-24-219f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Physician awareness of fluid volume administered with intravenous antibiotics: a structured interview-based study.医生对静脉注射抗生素时液体量的认知:一项基于结构化访谈的研究。
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2025 Mar;12(1):66-75. doi: 10.15441/ceem.24.219. Epub 2024 May 23.
2
Clinician attitudes and concordance with self-assessed and actual intravenous fluid prescribing patterns: A single-institution evaluation of survey and electronic prescribing data.临床医生的态度与自我评估和实际静脉输液处方模式的一致性:一项基于调查和电子处方数据的单机构评估。
Am J Med Sci. 2022 Jul;364(1):36-45. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2022.03.010. Epub 2022 Apr 3.
3
Sepsis Care Pathway 2019.2019年脓毒症护理路径
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):4. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.4. eCollection 2019.
4
Effect of Out-Of-Hour Admission on Fluid Treatment of Emergency Department Patients with Suspected Infection; a Multicenter Post-Hoc Analysis.非工作时间入院对疑似感染的急诊科患者液体治疗的影响;一项多中心事后分析。
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2023 Jan 31;11(1):e21. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v11i1.1839. eCollection 2023.
5
Antibiotic Prescribing Behavior of Physicians in Outpatient Departments in Hospitals in Northwest Ethiopia: Structural Equation Modeling Approach.埃塞俄比亚西北部医院门诊医生的抗生素处方行为:结构方程模型方法
Interact J Med Res. 2024 Oct 23;13:e57285. doi: 10.2196/57285.
6
Intravenous maintenance fluid therapy practice in the pediatric acute and critical care settings: a European and Middle Eastern survey.儿科急性和危重症监护环境中的静脉维持液治疗实践:一项欧洲和中东地区的调查。
Eur J Pediatr. 2022 Aug;181(8):3163-3172. doi: 10.1007/s00431-022-04467-y. Epub 2022 May 3.
7
Predictors of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing among primary care physicians.基层医疗医生不恰当抗生素处方的预测因素
CMAJ. 2007 Oct 9;177(8):877-83. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.070151.
8
Interdisciplinary knowledge gaps on intravenous fluid management in adult patients: Survey among physicians and nurses of a university hospital.成人患者静脉输液管理方面的跨学科知识差距:对某大学医院医生和护士的调查
J Eval Clin Pract. 2022 Aug;28(4):599-606. doi: 10.1111/jep.13663. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
9
Patterns of use and appropriateness of antibiotics prescribed to patients receiving haemodialysis: an observational study.接受血液透析患者抗生素的使用模式及合理性:一项观察性研究。
BMC Nephrol. 2017 May 12;18(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12882-017-0575-9.
10
Are Further Interventions Needed to Prevent and Manage Hospital-Acquired Hyponatraemia? A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey of IV Fluid Prescribing Practices.是否需要进一步干预措施来预防和管理医院获得性低钠血症?一项关于静脉输液处方实践的全国性横断面调查。
J Clin Med. 2020 Aug 29;9(9):2790. doi: 10.3390/jcm9092790.

本文引用的文献

1
Lower vs Higher Fluid Volumes in Adult Patients With Sepsis: An Updated Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis.成人脓毒症患者低与高血容量:更新的系统评价与荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。
Chest. 2023 Oct;164(4):892-912. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2023.04.036. Epub 2023 May 2.
2
Fluid management of emergency department patients with sepsis-A survey of fluid resuscitation practices.急诊脓毒症患者的液体管理-液体复苏实践调查。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2022 Nov;66(10):1237-1246. doi: 10.1111/aas.14141. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
3
Oral Is the New IV. Challenging Decades of Blood and Bone Infection Dogma: A Systematic Review.
口服是新的静脉注射。挑战数十年来血液和骨骼感染的教条:系统评价。
Am J Med. 2022 Mar;135(3):369-379.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2021.10.007. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
4
Intravenous push versus intravenous piggyback beta-lactams for the empiric management of gram-negative bacteremia.静脉推注与静脉滴注β-内酰胺类抗生素治疗革兰氏阴性菌血症的经验性治疗。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2021 Apr;46(2):373-381. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13291. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
5
Effect of IV Push Antibiotic Administration on Antibiotic Therapy Delays in Sepsis.静脉推注抗生素给药对脓毒症抗生素治疗延迟的影响。
Crit Care Med. 2020 Aug;48(8):1175-1179. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004430.
6
Fluid management and deresuscitation practices: A survey of critical care physicians.液体管理与复苏后处理措施:重症监护医师的一项调查
J Intensive Care Soc. 2020 May;21(2):111-118. doi: 10.1177/1751143719846442. Epub 2019 May 13.
7
Safety and tolerability of i.v. push piperacillin/tazobactam within an emergency department.静脉推注哌拉西林/他唑巴坦在急诊科的安全性和耐受性。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2020 Jun 23;77(13):1051-1053. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxaa114.
8
Fluid management knowledge in hospital physicians: 'Greenshoots' of improvement but still a cause for concern.医院医生的液体管理知识:“改善的萌芽”,但仍令人担忧。
Clin Med (Lond). 2020 May;20(3):e26-e31. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2019-0433.
9
Evaluation of a Paradigm Shift From Intravenous Antibiotics to Oral Step-Down Therapy for the Treatment of Infective Endocarditis: A Narrative Review.评价静脉用抗生素向口服降阶梯治疗感染性心内膜炎治疗策略转变的范例:一篇叙述性综述。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 May 1;180(5):769-777. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0555.
10
Survey of non-resuscitation fluids administered during septic shock: a multicenter prospective observational study.脓毒性休克期间给予的非复苏液体调查:一项多中心前瞻性观察性研究。
Ann Intensive Care. 2019 Nov 27;9(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s13613-019-0607-7.