Faculty of Psychology, Center for Cognitive and Decision Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Cognitive and Behavioral Decision Research, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2024 Aug 1;79(8). doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbae092.
Numerous theories exist regarding age differences in risk preference and related constructs, yet many of them offer conflicting predictions and fail to consider convergence between measurement modalities or constructs. To pave the way for conceptual clarification and theoretical refinement, in this preregistered study we aimed to comprehensively examine age effects on risk preference, impulsivity, and self-control using different measurement modalities, and to assess their convergence.
We collected a large battery of self-report, informant report, behavioral, hormone, and neuroimaging measures from a cross-sectional sample of 148 (55% female) healthy human participants between 16 and 81 years (mean age = 46 years, standard deviation [SD] = 19). We used an extended sample of 182 participants (54% female, mean age = 46 years, SD = 19) for robustness checks concerning the results from self-reports, informant reports, and behavioral measures. For our main analysis, we performed specification curve analyses to visualize and estimate the convergence between the different modalities and constructs.
Our multiverse analysis approach revealed convergent results for risk preference, impulsivity, and self-control from self- and informant reports, suggesting a negative effect of age. For behavioral, hormonal, and neuroimaging outcomes, age effects were mostly absent.
Our findings call for conceptual clarification and improved operationalization to capture the putative mechanisms underlying age-related differences in risk preference and related constructs.
关于风险偏好和相关构念的年龄差异,存在许多理论,但其中许多理论提供了相互矛盾的预测,且未能考虑到测量模式或构念之间的趋同。为了为概念澄清和理论完善铺平道路,在这项预先注册的研究中,我们旨在使用不同的测量模式全面检查风险偏好、冲动和自我控制的年龄效应,并评估它们的趋同。
我们从 16 至 81 岁(平均年龄 46 岁,标准差 [SD] 19)的 148 名(55%为女性)健康人类参与者的横断面样本中收集了大量的自我报告、知情者报告、行为、激素和神经影像学测量值。我们使用了一个由 182 名参与者组成的扩展样本(54%为女性,平均年龄 46 岁,SD 19)进行稳健性检查,涉及自我报告、知情者报告和行为测量的结果。对于我们的主要分析,我们进行了规范曲线分析,以可视化和估计不同模式和构念之间的趋同。
我们的多元分析方法揭示了来自自我和知情者报告的风险偏好、冲动和自我控制的趋同结果,表明年龄呈负相关。对于行为、激素和神经影像学结果,年龄效应大多不存在。
我们的发现呼吁进行概念澄清和操作改进,以捕捉风险偏好和相关构念的年龄相关差异的潜在机制。