Department of Infectious Diseases, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310016, China; Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology and Bioinformatics of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, 310016, China; Regional Medical Center for National Institute of Respiratory Diseases, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310016, China.
College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 320058, China.
Environ Pollut. 2024 Aug 15;355:124184. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124184. Epub 2024 May 21.
While sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) has long been used to disinfect drinking water, concerns have risen over its use due to causing potentially hazardous byproducts. Catalytic ozonation with metal-free catalysts has attracted increasing attention to eliminate the risk of secondary pollution of byproducts in water treatment. Here, we compared the disinfection efficiency and microbial community of catalytic ozone with a type of metal-free catalyst fluorinated ceramic honeycomb (FCH) and NaClO disinfectants under laboratory- and pilot-scale conditions. Under laboratory conditions, the disinfection rate of catalytic ozonation was 3∼6-fold that of ozone when the concentration of Escherichia coli was 1 × 10 CFU/ml, and all E. coli were killed within 15 s. However, 0.65 mg/L NaClO retained E. coli after 30 min using the traditional culturable approach. The microorganism inactivation results of raw reservoir water disinfected by catalytic ozonation and ozonation within 15 s were incomparable based on the cultural method. In pilot-scale testing, catalytic ozonation inactivated all environmental bacteria within 4 min, while 0.65 mg/L NaClO could not achieve this success. Both catalytic ozonation and NaClO-disinfected methods significantly reduced the number of microorganisms but did not change the relative abundances of different species, i.e., bacteria, viruses, eukaryotes, and archaea, based on metagenomic analyses. The abundance of virulence factors (VFs) and antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) was detected few in catalytic ozonation, as determined by metagenomic sequencing. Some VFs or ARGs, such as virulence gene 'FAS-II' which was hosted by Mycobacterium_tuberculosis, were detected solely by the NaClO-disinfected method. The enriched genes and pathways of cataO-disinfected methods exhibited an opposite trend, especially in human disease, compared with NaClO disinfection. These results indicated that the disinfection effect of catalytic ozone is superior to NaClO, this finding contributed to the large-scale application of catalytic ozonation with FCH in practical water treatment.
次氯酸钠(NaClO)长期以来一直被用于饮用水消毒,但由于其可能产生有害副产物,人们对其使用越来越关注。无金属催化剂催化臭氧化已引起人们越来越多的关注,以消除水处理中副产物二次污染的风险。在这里,我们比较了催化臭氧与一种无金属催化剂氟化陶瓷蜂窝(FCH)和 NaClO 消毒剂在实验室和中试规模下的消毒效率和微生物群落。在实验室条件下,当大肠杆菌浓度为 1×10 CFU/ml 时,催化臭氧化的消毒率是臭氧的 3∼6 倍,所有大肠杆菌在 15 s 内被杀死。然而,传统的可培养方法下,0.65 mg/L 的 NaClO 在 30 min 后仍保留大肠杆菌。根据培养方法,用催化臭氧化和臭氧化在 15 s 内消毒的原水库水的微生物失活动力学结果无法进行比较。在中试规模测试中,催化臭氧化在 4 min 内使所有环境细菌失活,而 0.65 mg/L 的 NaClO 无法实现这一效果。催化臭氧化和 NaClO 消毒方法都显著减少了微生物数量,但基于宏基因组分析,并未改变不同物种(细菌、病毒、真核生物和古菌)的相对丰度。基于宏基因组测序,催化臭氧化中检测到的毒力因子(VF)和抗生素耐药基因(ARGs)的丰度很少。一些 VF 或 ARG,如宿主为结核分枝杆菌的毒力基因“FAS-II”,仅通过 NaClO 消毒方法检测到。与 NaClO 消毒相比,cataO 消毒方法富集的基因和途径表现出相反的趋势,特别是在人类疾病方面。这些结果表明,催化臭氧的消毒效果优于 NaClO,这一发现有助于在实际水处理中大规模应用 FCH 催化臭氧化。