Infrastructure and Environment Research Division, School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, G12 8LT, Glasgow, UK.
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Microbiome. 2020 Mar 20;8(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00813-0.
Limiting microbial growth during drinking water distribution is achieved either by maintaining a disinfectant residual or through nutrient limitation without using a disinfectant. The impact of these contrasting approaches on the drinking water microbiome is not systematically understood. We use genome-resolved metagenomics to compare the structure, metabolic traits, and population genomes of drinking water microbiome samples from bulk drinking water across multiple full-scale disinfected and non-disinfected drinking water systems. Microbial communities cluster at the structural- and functional potential-level based on the presence/absence of a disinfectant residual. Disinfectant residual alone explained 17 and 6.5% of the variance in structure and functional potential of the drinking water microbiome, respectively, despite including multiple drinking water systems with variable source waters and source water communities and treatment strategies. The drinking water microbiome is structurally and functionally less diverse and variable across disinfected compared to non-disinfected systems. While bacteria were the most abundant domain, archaea and eukaryota were more abundant in non-disinfected and disinfected systems, respectively. Community-level differences in functional potential were driven by enrichment of genes associated with carbon and nitrogen fixation in non-disinfected systems and γ-aminobutyrate metabolism in disinfected systems likely associated with the recycling of amino acids. Genome-level analyses for a subset of phylogenetically-related microorganisms suggests that disinfection selects for microorganisms capable of using fatty acids, presumably from microbial decay products, via the glyoxylate cycle. Overall, we find that disinfection exhibits systematic selective pressures on the drinking water microbiome and may select for microorganisms able to utilize microbial decay products originating from disinfection-inactivated microorganisms. Video abstract.
在饮用水分配过程中,通过保持消毒剂残留或通过不使用消毒剂进行营养限制来实现限制微生物生长。这些对比方法对饮用水微生物组的影响并没有得到系统的理解。我们使用基于基因组的宏基因组学来比较来自多个全规模消毒和非消毒饮用水系统的总饮用水中的饮用水微生物组样本的结构、代谢特征和种群基因组。基于消毒剂残留的存在/不存在,微生物群落按结构和功能潜力水平聚类。尽管包括了具有不同水源水和水源水群落以及处理策略的多个饮用水系统,但消毒剂残留单独解释了饮用水微生物组结构和功能潜力的 17%和 6.5%的方差。与非消毒系统相比,消毒系统中的饮用水微生物组在结构和功能上的多样性和可变性都较低。虽然细菌是最丰富的域,但古菌和真核生物在非消毒和消毒系统中分别更为丰富。非消毒系统中与碳和氮固定相关的基因以及消毒系统中与γ-氨基丁酸代谢相关的基因的富集驱动了功能潜力的群落水平差异,这可能与氨基酸的循环利用有关。一组具有系统发育相关性的微生物的基因组水平分析表明,消毒对能够通过乙醛酸循环利用脂肪酸(可能来自微生物分解产物)的微生物具有选择性压力。总的来说,我们发现消毒对饮用水微生物组表现出系统的选择性压力,并且可能选择能够利用来自消毒失活微生物的微生物分解产物的微生物。视频摘要。