Department of Respiratory Care, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Guoxue Alley 37#, Wuhou District, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.
Department of Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Guoxue Alley 37#, Wuhou District, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.
BMC Pulm Med. 2024 May 23;24(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s12890-024-03065-y.
Conventional Mechanical ventilation modes used for individuals suffering from acute respiratory distress syndrome have the potential to exacerbate lung injury through regional alveolar overinflation and/or repetitive alveolar collapse with shearing, known as atelectrauma. Animal studies have demonstrated that airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) offers distinct advantages over conventional mechanical ventilation modes. However, the methodologies for implementing APRV vary widely, and the findings from clinical studies remain controversial. This study (APRVplus trial), aims to assess the impact of an early pathophysiology-driven APRV ventilation approach compared to a low tidal volume ventilation (LTV) strategy on the prognosis of patients with moderate to severe ARDS.
The APRVplus trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial, building upon our prior single-center study, to enroll 840 patients from at least 35 hospitals in China. This investigation plans to compare the early pathophysiology-driven APRV ventilation approach with the control intervention of LTV lung-protective ventilation. The primary outcome measure will be all-cause mortality at 28 days after randomization in the intensive care units (ICU). Secondary outcome measures will include assessments of oxygenation, and physiology parameters at baseline, as well as on days 1, 2, and 3. Additionally, clinical outcomes such as ventilator-free days at 28 days, duration of ICU and hospital stay, ICU and hospital mortality, and the occurrence of adverse events will be evaluated.
The research project has obtained approval from the Ethics Committee of West China Hospital of Sichuan University (2019-337). Informed consent is required. The results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at one or more scientific conferences.
The study was registered at Clinical Trials.gov (NCT03549910) on June 8, 2018.
用于患有急性呼吸窘迫综合征的个体的传统机械通气模式有可能通过区域肺泡过度充气和/或剪切作用导致的复发性肺泡塌陷(称为肺不张伤)加重肺损伤。动物研究表明,气道压力释放通气(APRV)与传统机械通气模式相比具有明显优势。然而,APRV 的实施方法差异很大,临床研究的结果仍存在争议。本研究(APRVplus 试验)旨在评估与小潮气量通气(LTV)策略相比,早期基于病理生理学的 APRV 通气方法对中重度 ARDS 患者预后的影响。
APRVplus 试验是一项前瞻性、多中心、随机临床试验,建立在我们之前的单中心研究基础上,将在中国至少 35 家医院招募 840 名患者。该研究旨在比较早期基于病理生理学的 APRV 通气方法与 LTV 肺保护性通气的对照干预。主要结局指标是 ICU 内随机分组后 28 天的全因死亡率。次要结局指标包括氧合和生理参数的基线评估,以及第 1、2 和 3 天的评估。此外,还将评估临床结局,如 28 天无呼吸机天数、ICU 和住院时间、ICU 和医院死亡率以及不良事件的发生。
该研究项目已获得四川大学华西医院伦理委员会的批准(2019-337)。需要获得知情同意。研究结果将提交给同行评议的期刊发表,并在一个或多个科学会议上展示。
该研究于 2018 年 6 月 8 日在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册(NCT03549910)。