O'Donoghue Brian, Mora Linda, Bismark Marie, Thompson Andrew, McGorry Patrick
Department of Psychiatry, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Department of Psychiatry, St Vincents University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2025 Jan;19(1):e13578. doi: 10.1111/eip.13578. Epub 2024 May 23.
Despite being the most effective antipsychotic medication for treatment-resistant psychosis, clozapine is often under-utilized with long delays to initiation.
This study aimed to determine whether the integration of a clozapine clinic within an early intervention for psychosis service resulted in a change in the rate and time to initiation of clozapine, the number of trials of different antipsychotic medications prior to clozapine, community initiation and discontinuation rates.
A clozapine clinic was established in the Early Psychosis Prevention and Intervention Centre in Melbourne. This was a pre- and post-evaluation study design. The 'clozapine clinic' cohort included those who commenced on clozapine from 01 January 2016 to 30 June 2018.
Prior to the clozapine clinic, 24 young people commenced clozapine over the 30-month period compared to 36 in the clozapine clinic cohort (RR = 1.30, 95% CI: 0.75-2.28, p = .32). In the pre-clozapine clinic cohort, 4.6% of all those with a first episode of psychosis were commenced on clozapine compared to 6% in the clozapine clinic cohort. Prior to the clozapine clinic, the median time to the commencement of clozapine was 72 weeks (IQR: 38, 87), compared to 53.5 weeks (IQR: 38, 81.5) in the clozapine clinic (Z = -0.86, p = .393). The mean number of different antipsychotic medications prior to commencing clozapine remained stable at 3.2 (SD ± 1.1) in both cohorts (t = -0.20, p = .841). There was a lower rate of discontinuation in the clozapine clinic (43.5% vs. 14.7%, HR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.09-0.98, p = .046).
While this study was underpowered and there are limitations to the naturalistic study design, the findings lend support to the integration of a clozapine clinic within early intervention for psychosis services.
尽管氯氮平是治疗难治性精神病最有效的抗精神病药物,但它经常未得到充分利用,开始使用的时间会延迟很久。
本研究旨在确定在精神病早期干预服务中设立氯氮平诊所是否会导致氯氮平开始使用的速率和时间、开始使用氯氮平之前不同抗精神病药物的试验次数、社区开始使用和停药率发生变化。
在墨尔本的早期精神病预防和干预中心设立了一个氯氮平诊所。这是一项前后评估研究设计。“氯氮平诊所”队列包括2016年1月1日至2018年6月30日开始使用氯氮平的患者。
在氯氮平诊所设立之前,在30个月期间有24名年轻人开始使用氯氮平,而氯氮平诊所队列中有36人(相对危险度=1.30,95%可信区间:0.75-2.28,p=0.32)。在氯氮平诊所设立之前,所有首次发作精神病的患者中4.6%开始使用氯氮平,而氯氮平诊所队列中这一比例为6%。在氯氮平诊所设立之前,开始使用氯氮平的中位时间为72周(四分位间距:38,87),而氯氮平诊所为53.5周(四分位间距:38,81.5)(Z=-0.86,p=0.393)。两个队列中开始使用氯氮平之前不同抗精神病药物的平均数量均稳定在3.2(标准差±1.1)(t=-0.20,p=0.841)。氯氮平诊所的停药率较低(43.5%对14.7%,风险比=0.30,95%可信区间:0.09-0.98,p=0.046)。
虽然本研究的效能不足且自然主义研究设计存在局限性,但研究结果支持在精神病早期干预服务中设立氯氮平诊所。