Orbaek P, Risberg J, Rosén I, Haeger-Aronsen B, Hagstadius S, Hjortsberg U, Regnell G, Rehnström S, Svensson K, Welinder H
Scand J Work Environ Health. 1985;11 Suppl 2:1-28.
The effects of organic solvents on 50 male workers exposed 5-46 (mean 18) years were studied with a cross-sectional design. Referents were matched pairwise according to age and education. An analysis of confounders confirmed good comparability between the two groups. As indicators of organic brain dysfunction regional cerebral blood flow was measured and the power spectrum of the subjects' electroencephalograms was analyzed, the former being reduced 4% and the latter showing increased power in the delta and beta bands in the exposed group. Symptoms of brain dysfunction were significantly more frequent among the exposed subjects and showed an exposure-effect relationship. Neuropsychological tests revealed definite indication of brain dysfunction in 14% of the exposed subjects in comparison to none in the reference group. The exposed subjects performed significantly worse than the referents in tests measuring focused attention abilities. A neurophysiological examination of the peripheral nervous system showed no difference between the groups. Clinical chemistry demonstrated no differences that could be explained by solvent exposure.
采用横断面设计研究了有机溶剂对50名接触有机溶剂5至46年(平均18年)的男性工人的影响。根据年龄和教育程度对对照者进行配对。对混杂因素的分析证实两组之间具有良好的可比性。作为有机脑功能障碍的指标,测量了局部脑血流量,并分析了受试者脑电图的功率谱,结果显示暴露组前者减少了4%,后者在δ波和β波频段功率增加。暴露组中脑功能障碍症状明显更常见,且呈现暴露-效应关系。神经心理学测试显示,14%的暴露组受试者有明确的脑功能障碍迹象,而对照组则无。在测量集中注意力能力的测试中,暴露组受试者的表现明显比对照组差。对周围神经系统的神经生理学检查显示两组之间没有差异。临床化学检查未发现可由溶剂暴露解释的差异。