Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Department of Radiology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Tomography. 2024 May 13;10(5):738-760. doi: 10.3390/tomography10050057.
Radiation treatment of cancers like prostate or cervix cancer requires considering nearby bone structures like vertebrae. In this work, we present and validate a novel automated method for the 3D segmentation of individual lumbar and thoracic vertebra in computed tomography (CT) scans. It is based on a single, low-complexity convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture which works well even if little application-specific training data are available. It is based on volume patch-based processing, enabling the handling of arbitrary scan sizes. For each patch, it performs segmentation and an estimation of up to three vertebrae center locations in one step, which enables utilizing an advanced post-processing scheme to achieve high segmentation accuracy, as required for clinical use. Overall, 1763 vertebrae were used for the performance assessment. On 26 CT scans acquired for standard radiation treatment planning, a Dice coefficient of 0.921 ± 0.047 (mean ± standard deviation) and a signed distance error of 0.271 ± 0.748 mm was achieved. On the large-sized publicly available VerSe2020 data set with 129 CT scans depicting lumbar and thoracic vertebrae, the overall Dice coefficient was 0.940 ± 0.065 and the signed distance error was 0.109 ± 0.301 mm. A comparison to other methods that have been validated on VerSe data showed that our approach achieved a better overall segmentation performance.
治疗前列腺癌或宫颈癌等癌症的放射治疗需要考虑到附近的骨骼结构,如脊椎。在这项工作中,我们提出并验证了一种新的自动方法,用于在计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描中对单个腰椎和胸椎进行 3D 分割。它基于一个单一的、低复杂度的卷积神经网络(CNN)架构,即使可用的特定于应用的训练数据很少,也能很好地工作。它基于基于体积的面片处理,能够处理任意扫描大小。对于每个面片,它在一步中执行分割和多达三个椎体中心位置的估计,这使得能够利用先进的后处理方案来实现高分割精度,这是临床应用所需要的。总的来说,我们使用了 1763 个椎体来进行性能评估。在 26 次用于标准放射治疗计划的 CT 扫描中,达到了 0.921 ± 0.047(平均值 ± 标准差)的 Dice 系数和 0.271 ± 0.748mm 的签名距离误差。在包含 129 次腰椎和胸椎 CT 扫描的大型公开可用的 VerSe2020 数据集上,整体 Dice 系数为 0.940 ± 0.065,签名距离误差为 0.109 ± 0.301mm。与已经在 VerSe 数据上验证过的其他方法的比较表明,我们的方法实现了更好的整体分割性能。