Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2413140. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.13140.
Time on the electronic health record (EHR) is associated with burnout among physicians. Newer virtual scribe models, which enable support from either a real-time or asynchronous scribe, have the potential to reduce the burden of the EHR and EHR-related documentation.
To characterize the association of use of virtual scribes with changes in physicians' EHR time and note and order composition and to identify the physician, scribe, and scribe response factors associated with changes in EHR time upon virtual scribe use.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective, pre-post quality improvement study of 144 physicians across specialties who had used a scribe for at least 3 months from January 2020 to September 2022, were affiliated with Brigham and Women's Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital, and cared for patients in the outpatient setting. Data were analyzed from November 2022 to January 2024.
Use of either a real-time or asynchronous virtual scribe.
Total EHR time, time on notes, and pajama time (5:30 pm to 7:00 am on weekdays and nonscheduled weekends and holidays), all per appointment; proportion of the note written by the physician and team contribution to orders.
The main study sample included 144 unique physicians who had used a virtual scribe for at least 3 months in 152 unique scribe participation episodes (134 [88.2%] had used an asynchronous scribe service). Nearly two-thirds of the physicians (91 physicians [63.2%]) were female and more than half (86 physicians [59.7%]) were in primary care specialties. Use of a virtual scribe was associated with significant decreases in total EHR time per appointment (mean [SD] of 5.6 [16.4] minutes; P < .001) in the 3 months after vs the 3 months prior to scribe use. Scribe use was also associated with significant decreases in note time per appointment and pajama time per appointment (mean [SD] of 1.3 [3.3] minutes; P < .001 and 1.1 [4.0] minutes; P = .004). In a multivariable linear regression model, the following factors were associated with significant decreases in total EHR time per appointment with a scribe use at 3 months: practicing in a medical specialty (-7.8; 95% CI, -13.4 to -2.2 minutes), greater baseline EHR time per appointment (-0.3; 95% CI, -0.4 to -0.2 minutes per additional minute of baseline EHR time), and decrease in the percentage of the note contributed by the physician (-9.1; 95% CI, -17.3 to -0.8 minutes for every percentage point decrease).
In 2 academic medical centers, use of virtual scribes was associated with significant decreases in total EHR time, time spent on notes, and pajama time, all per appointment. Virtual scribes may be particularly effective among medical specialists and those physicians with greater baseline EHR time.
电子病历(EHR)上的时间与医生的倦怠有关。新型虚拟抄写员模型可以支持实时或异步抄写员,有潜力减轻 EHR 的负担和与 EHR 相关的文档工作。
描述使用虚拟抄写员与医生 EHR 时间以及笔记和医嘱组成的变化之间的关联,并确定与使用虚拟抄写员后 EHR 时间变化相关的医生、抄写员和抄写员响应因素。
设计、设置和参与者:这是一项回顾性、预-后质量改进研究,纳入了 2020 年 1 月至 2022 年 9 月期间至少使用过 3 个月抄写员的 144 名专业医生,这些医生隶属于布莱根妇女医院和马萨诸塞州综合医院,在门诊环境中为患者提供服务。数据分析于 2022 年 11 月至 2024 年 1 月进行。
使用实时或异步虚拟抄写员。
每次预约的总 EHR 时间、笔记时间和睡衣时间(工作日下午 5:30 至 7:00,以及非计划周末和节假日);每位医生撰写的笔记比例和团队对医嘱的贡献。
主要研究样本包括 144 名在 152 次抄写员参与事件中至少使用过 3 个月虚拟抄写员的独特医生(134 名[88.2%]使用了异步抄写员服务)。近三分之二的医生(91 名医生[63.2%])为女性,超过一半(86 名医生[59.7%])为初级保健专业医生。与使用抄写员前的 3 个月相比,使用虚拟抄写员后,每次预约的总 EHR 时间显著减少(平均[标准差]为 5.6[16.4]分钟;P<0.001)。抄写员的使用还与每次预约的笔记时间和睡衣时间显著减少相关(平均[标准差]为 1.3[3.3]分钟;P<0.001 和 1.1[4.0]分钟;P=0.004)。在多变量线性回归模型中,以下因素与使用抄写员后每次预约的总 EHR 时间显著减少相关:在医学专业中执业(-7.8;95%置信区间,-13.4 至-2.2 分钟)、每次预约的基线 EHR 时间更长(-0.3;95%置信区间,-0.4 至-0.2 分钟,每增加一分钟基线 EHR 时间)以及医生撰写的笔记比例下降(-9.1;95%置信区间,-17.3 至-0.8 分钟,每下降一个百分点)。
在 2 家学术医疗中心,使用虚拟抄写员与每次预约的总 EHR 时间、笔记时间和睡衣时间的显著减少相关。虚拟抄写员在医学专家和基线 EHR 时间较长的医生中可能特别有效。