Suppr超能文献

心理干预对癌症患者焦虑和抑郁的疗效比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。

Comparative efficacy of psychological interventions on anxiety and depression in patients with cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China.

Institute of Cancer Clinical Prevention and Control, Medical Department of Jingchu University of Technology, Jingmen, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 May 24;103(21):e38155. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038155.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies have demonstrated that psychological interventions are effective in alleviating anxiety and depression in patients with cancer. However, the optimal psychological intervention to alleviate anxiety and depression in patients with cancer remains unknown. This study was carried out to compare and rank the comparative effectiveness of various psychological interventions on anxiety and depression in patients with cancer.

METHODS

Databases, namely PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PsycINFO, CNKI, WanFang, VIP and CBM were systematically searched from their inception dates to December 2023 for randomized controlled trials of psychological interventions for anxiety and depression in patients with cancer. Utilizing the Cochrane Review Manager 5.4, we evaluated the risk of bias in the studies included in the current study based on the Cochrane Handbook 5.1.0 Methodological Quality Evaluation Criteria. The NMA was conducted using STATA 15.0. This study did not involve human participants and therefore did not require ethical approval.

RESULTS

Thirty-one randomized controlled trials involving 3471 participants were included. MT [SMD = 1.35, 95% CI (0.76, 1.93)] and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) [SMD = 0.97, 95% CI (0.53, 1.42)] were superior to usual care in alleviating anxiety. Besides, interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) [SMD = 1.17, 95% CI (0.06, 2.28)], CBT [SMD = 0.97, 95 % CI (0.63, 1.30)], and MT [SMD = 0.93, 95% CI (0.35, 1.50)] were superior to usual care in alleviating depression. In addition, CBT was superior to family therapy in alleviating depression [SMD = 0.73, 95% CI (0.08, 1.38)]. The MT, CBT, and IPT ranked in the top three in alleviating anxiety, while IPT, CBT, and MT ranked in the top three in alleviating depression.

CONCLUSION

MT and IPT would be a more appropriate option in alleviating anxiety and depression in patients with cancer, respectively. This study also suggested that CBT had a significant effect in alleviating negative emotions in patients with cancer. However, the results need to be validated by high-quality and large-sample studies.

摘要

背景

大量研究表明,心理干预可有效缓解癌症患者的焦虑和抑郁。然而,缓解癌症患者焦虑和抑郁的最佳心理干预措施仍不清楚。本研究旨在比较和排序各种心理干预措施对癌症患者焦虑和抑郁的相对有效性。

方法

系统检索 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆、Web of Science、PsycINFO、中国知网、万方、维普及中国生物医学文献数据库,检索时限均为建库至 2023 年 12 月,收集针对癌症患者焦虑和抑郁的心理干预的随机对照试验。使用 Cochrane 协作网偏倚风险评估工具评价纳入研究的偏倚风险,并采用 STATA 15.0 软件进行网状 Meta 分析。本研究不涉及人类参与者,因此无需伦理批准。

结果

共纳入 31 项随机对照试验,涉及 3471 名参与者。正念减压疗法[SMD=1.35,95%可信区间(0.76,1.93)]和认知行为疗法[SMD=0.97,95%可信区间(0.53,1.42)]在缓解焦虑方面优于常规护理。此外,人际心理治疗[SMD=1.17,95%可信区间(0.06,2.28)]、认知行为疗法[SMD=0.97,95%可信区间(0.63,1.30)]和正念减压疗法[SMD=0.93,95%可信区间(0.35,1.50)]在缓解抑郁方面优于常规护理。此外,认知行为疗法在缓解抑郁方面优于家庭治疗[SMD=0.73,95%可信区间(0.08,1.38)]。正念减压疗法、认知行为疗法和人际心理治疗在缓解焦虑方面排名前三,而人际心理治疗、认知行为疗法和正念减压疗法在缓解抑郁方面排名前三。

结论

正念减压疗法和人际心理治疗可能分别是缓解癌症患者焦虑和抑郁的更合适选择。本研究还表明,认知行为疗法在缓解癌症患者的负性情绪方面具有显著效果。然而,这些结果需要高质量和大样本的研究来验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3397/11124676/f503221caee8/medi-103-e38155-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验