• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

辅助机器人虚拟平台的肌电控制模式比较

A Comparison of Myoelectric Control Modes for an Assistive Robotic Virtual Platform.

作者信息

Polo-Hortigüela Cristina, Maximo Miriam, Jara Carlos A, Ramon Jose L, Garcia Gabriel J, Ubeda Andres

机构信息

Brain-Machine Interface Systems Lab, Miguel Hernández University of Elche, 03202 Elche, Spain.

Engineering Research Institute of Elche-I3E, Miguel Hernández University of Elche, 03202 Elche, Spain.

出版信息

Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 May 9;11(5):473. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11050473.

DOI:10.3390/bioengineering11050473
PMID:38790340
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11117720/
Abstract

In this paper, we propose a daily living situation where objects in a kitchen can be grasped and stored in specific containers using a virtual robot arm operated by different myoelectric control modes. The main goal of this study is to prove the feasibility of providing virtual environments controlled through surface electromyography that can be used for the future training of people using prosthetics or with upper limb motor impairments. We propose that simple control algorithms can be a more natural and robust way to interact with prostheses and assistive robotics in general than complex multipurpose machine learning approaches. Additionally, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of adding intelligence to the setup to automatically assist grasping activities. The results show very good performance across all participants who share similar opinions regarding the execution of each of the proposed control modes.

摘要

在本文中,我们提出了一种日常生活场景,即使用由不同肌电控制模式操作的虚拟机器人手臂,在厨房中抓取物体并将其存放在特定容器中。本研究的主要目标是证明通过表面肌电图控制虚拟环境的可行性,该环境可用于未来对使用假肢或有上肢运动障碍的人进行训练。我们提出,与复杂的多用途机器学习方法相比,简单的控制算法通常是与假肢和辅助机器人进行交互的更自然、更可靠的方式。此外,我们还讨论了在设置中添加智能以自动辅助抓取活动的优缺点。结果表明,所有参与者在对每种提议的控制模式的执行方面都有相似的看法,并且表现都非常出色。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7dde/11117720/10468d411833/bioengineering-11-00473-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7dde/11117720/a03ce76d8505/bioengineering-11-00473-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7dde/11117720/e8c5ad371e93/bioengineering-11-00473-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7dde/11117720/10468d411833/bioengineering-11-00473-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7dde/11117720/a03ce76d8505/bioengineering-11-00473-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7dde/11117720/e8c5ad371e93/bioengineering-11-00473-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7dde/11117720/10468d411833/bioengineering-11-00473-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
A Comparison of Myoelectric Control Modes for an Assistive Robotic Virtual Platform.辅助机器人虚拟平台的肌电控制模式比较
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 May 9;11(5):473. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11050473.
2
Learning to teleoperate an upper-limb assistive humanoid robot for bimanual daily-living tasks.学习远程操控上肢辅助仿人机器人完成双手日常生活任务。
Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2021 Dec 16;8(1). doi: 10.1088/2057-1976/ac3881.
3
A Systematic Study on Electromyography-Based Hand Gesture Recognition for Assistive Robots Using Deep Learning and Machine Learning Models.基于深度学习和机器学习模型的辅助机器人肌电图手 gestures 识别的系统研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 May 11;22(10):3650. doi: 10.3390/s22103650.
4
Application of real-time machine learning to myoelectric prosthesis control: A case series in adaptive switching.实时机器学习在肌电假肢控制中的应用:自适应切换的病例系列
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2016 Oct;40(5):573-81. doi: 10.1177/0309364615605373. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
5
Assessment of Myoelectric Controller Performance and Kinematic Behavior of a Novel Soft Synergy-Inspired Robotic Hand for Prosthetic Applications.用于假肢应用的新型软协同启发式机器人手的肌电控制器性能和运动行为评估
Front Neurorobot. 2016 Oct 17;10:11. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2016.00011. eCollection 2016.
6
Robot-assisted training compared with an enhanced upper limb therapy programme and with usual care for upper limb functional limitation after stroke: the RATULS three-group RCT.机器人辅助训练与强化上肢治疗方案以及常规护理相比,对脑卒中后上肢功能受限的影响:RATULS 三臂 RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Oct;24(54):1-232. doi: 10.3310/hta24540.
7
Vibrotactile grasping force and hand aperture feedback for myoelectric forearm prosthesis users.用于肌电前臂假肢使用者的振动触觉抓握力和手孔反馈
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2015 Jun;39(3):204-12. doi: 10.1177/0309364614522260. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
8
Myoelectric Control Systems for Upper Limb Wearable Robotic Exoskeletons and Exosuits-A Systematic Review.用于上肢可穿戴机器人外骨骼和外骨骼的肌电控制系统:系统评价。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Oct 24;22(21):8134. doi: 10.3390/s22218134.
9
Virtual Integration Environment as an Advanced Prosthetic Limb Training Platform.虚拟集成环境作为一种先进的假肢训练平台。
Front Neurol. 2018 Oct 17;9:785. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00785. eCollection 2018.
10
Towards functional robotic training: motor learning of dynamic tasks is enhanced by haptic rendering but hampered by arm weight support.迈向功能性机器人训练:触觉渲染可增强动态任务的运动学习,但会受到手臂重量支撑的阻碍。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022 Feb 13;19(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12984-022-00993-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Amputations of Lower Limb in Subjects with Diabetes Mellitus: Reasons and 30-Day Mortality.下肢截肢术在糖尿病患者中的应用:原因与 30 天死亡率。
J Diabetes Res. 2021 Jul 24;2021:8866126. doi: 10.1155/2021/8866126. eCollection 2021.
2
Global prevalence of traumatic non-fatal limb amputation.全球创伤性非致命性肢体截肢的流行率。
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2021 Apr 1;45(2):105-114. doi: 10.1177/0309364620972258.
3
Prosthesis satisfaction in a national sample of Veterans with upper limb amputation.全国上肢截肢退伍军人样本中的假肢满意度
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2020 Apr;44(2):81-91. doi: 10.1177/0309364619895201. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
4
Myoelectric Pattern Recognition for Controlling a Robotic Hand: A Feasibility Study in Stroke.肌电模式识别控制机器人手:脑卒中的可行性研究。
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2019 Feb;66(2):365-372. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2018.2840848. Epub 2018 May 25.
5
Evaluation of EMG pattern recognition for upper limb prosthesis control: a case study in comparison with direct myoelectric control.肌电图模式识别在上肢假肢控制中的评估:与直接肌电控制的对比案例研究。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018 Mar 15;15(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12984-018-0361-3.
6
Myoelectric control of prosthetic hands: state-of-the-art review.假手的肌电控制:最新技术综述
Med Devices (Auckl). 2016 Jul 27;9:247-55. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S91102. eCollection 2016.
7
Refined clothespin relocation test and assessment of motion.改良衣夹复位试验及运动评估
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2017 Jun;41(3):294-302. doi: 10.1177/0309364616660250. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
8
Electromyography data for non-invasive naturally-controlled robotic hand prostheses.肌电图数据用于非侵入式自然控制的机器人手假肢。
Sci Data. 2014 Dec 23;1:140053. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2014.53. eCollection 2014.
9
A state-based, proportional myoelectric control method: online validation and comparison with the clinical state-of-the-art.一种基于状态的比例肌电控制方法:在线验证及与临床现有技术的比较
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014 Jul 10;11:110. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-110.
10
Real-time myoelectric control of a multi-fingered hand prosthesis using principal components analysis.基于主成分分析的多手指假肢的实时肌电控制。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2012 Jun 15;9:40. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-9-40.