• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定不同人口统计学特征牛群的经济最优预防性策略。

Determining the Economically Optimum Metaphylactic Strategy for Cattle Cohorts of Varied Demographic Characteristics.

作者信息

Kopp Dannell J, Larson Robert L, Lancaster Phillip A, White Bradley J, Smith Kristen J, Pendell Dustin L

机构信息

Beef Cattle Institute, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.

Private Consultant, Baldwin City, KS 66006, USA.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2024 May 10;14(10):1423. doi: 10.3390/ani14101423.

DOI:10.3390/ani14101423
PMID:38791641
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11117203/
Abstract

Metaphylactic antibiotic use in feeder cattle is a common practice to control respiratory disease. Antimicrobial stewardship is important to ensure continued efficacy and to protect animal welfare. The objective of this study is to identify characteristics of cohorts of cattle that had not received metaphylaxis that would have benefited economically from the use of metaphylaxis. Cohorts ( = 12,785; 2,206,338 head) from 13 feedlots that did not receive metaphylaxis were modeled using an economic model to estimate net returns for three metaphylactic options. Logistic regression models with covariates for entry weight, sex, average daily weight gain, number of animals per cohort, and days on feed, with feedlot as a random effect, were used to determine the model-adjusted probability of cohorts benefiting economically from metaphylaxis. Most (72%) cohorts in this data set that had not received metaphylaxis at arrival would not economically benefit from metaphylaxis. Sex, entry weight category, number of cattle in the cohort, and average daily weight gain were associated with the likelihood of benefitting economically from metaphylaxis. The results illustrated that cattle cohort demographics influenced the probability that cohorts would benefit economically from metaphylaxis and the type of metaphylaxis utilized, and integrating this information has the potential to influence the metaphylaxis decision.

摘要

在育肥牛中预防性使用抗生素是控制呼吸道疾病的常见做法。抗菌药物管理对于确保持续疗效和保护动物福利非常重要。本研究的目的是确定未接受预防性用药但使用预防性用药会在经济上受益的牛群特征。使用经济模型对来自13个未接受预防性用药的饲养场的牛群(n = 12,785;2,206,338头)进行建模,以估计三种预防性用药方案的净收益。使用带有入栏体重、性别、平均日增重、每群动物数量和饲养天数协变量的逻辑回归模型,并将饲养场作为随机效应,来确定牛群从预防性用药中获得经济收益的模型调整概率。该数据集中大多数(72%)到达时未接受预防性用药的牛群不会从预防性用药中获得经济收益。性别、入栏体重类别、牛群中的牛数量和平均日增重与从预防性用药中获得经济收益的可能性相关。结果表明,牛群的人口统计学特征影响了牛群从预防性用药中获得经济收益的概率以及所使用的预防性用药类型,整合这些信息有可能影响预防性用药决策。

相似文献

1
Determining the Economically Optimum Metaphylactic Strategy for Cattle Cohorts of Varied Demographic Characteristics.确定不同人口统计学特征牛群的经济最优预防性策略。
Animals (Basel). 2024 May 10;14(10):1423. doi: 10.3390/ani14101423.
2
Net return distributions when metaphylaxis is used to control bovine respiratory disease in high health-risk cattle.在高健康风险牛群中使用群体预防措施控制牛呼吸道疾病时的净收益分布情况。
Transl Anim Sci. 2020 Feb 17;4(2):txaa020. doi: 10.1093/tas/txaa020. eCollection 2020 Apr.
3
Observational study of the effect of metaphylaxis treatment on feedlot cattle productivity and health.群体预防治疗对育肥牛生产力和健康影响的观察性研究。
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Jul 22;9:947585. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.947585. eCollection 2022.
4
Non-inferiority of nitric oxide releasing intranasal spray compared to sub-therapeutic antibiotics to reduce incidence of undifferentiated fever and bovine respiratory disease complex in low to moderate risk beef cattle arriving at a commercial feedlot.与亚治疗剂量抗生素相比,一氧化氮释放鼻喷雾剂在降低进入商业饲养场的低至中度风险肉牛未分化发热和牛呼吸道疾病综合征发病率方面的非劣效性。
Prev Vet Med. 2017 Mar 1;138:162-169. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.04.008. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
5
Comparison of tulathromycin and tilmicosin on the prevalence and severity of bovine respiratory disease in feedlot cattle in association with feedlot performance, carcass characteristics, and economic factors.图拉霉素与替米考星对育肥牛呼吸道疾病的患病率和严重程度的比较及其与育肥性能、胴体特征和经济因素的关系。
J Anim Sci. 2014 Nov;92(11):5203-13. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-7814.
6
Comparison of two distinct arrival and treatment programs for bovine respiratory disease in high-risk feeder cattle entering a feedlot.针对进入饲养场的高风险育肥牛,比较两种不同的牛呼吸道疾病发病及治疗方案。
Transl Anim Sci. 2022 Jul 27;6(3):txac102. doi: 10.1093/tas/txac102. eCollection 2022 Jul.
7
A mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis of metaphylaxis treatments for bovine respiratory disease in beef cattle.肉牛牛呼吸道疾病预防性治疗的混合治疗比较荟萃分析。
J Anim Sci. 2017 Feb;95(2):626-635. doi: 10.2527/jas.2016.1062.
8
Use of Antimicrobial Metaphylaxis for the Control of Bovine Respiratory Disease in High-Risk Cattle.使用抗菌药物预防性给药控制高危牛群的牛呼吸道疾病
Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2015 Nov;31(3):341-50, v. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2015.05.008. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
9
Comprehensive Outcomes Affected by Antimicrobial Metaphylaxis of Feedlot Calves at Medium-Risk for Bovine Respiratory Disease from a Randomized Controlled Trial.一项随机对照试验中,抗菌药物预防性给药对处于牛呼吸道疾病中度风险的饲养场犊牛综合结局的影响
Vet Sci. 2023 Jan 17;10(2):67. doi: 10.3390/vetsci10020067.
10
Temporal distributions of respiratory disease events within cohorts of feedlot cattle and associations with cattle health and performance indices.肥育牛队列中呼吸道疾病事件的时间分布及其与牛健康和性能指标的关联。
Prev Vet Med. 2010 Dec 1;97(3-4):198-219. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2010.09.003. Epub 2010 Oct 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Determining the Effect of Varied Proportions of Cohort Administered Tulathromycin at Arrival on Nasopharyngeal Microbiota and Performance Characteristics in Yearling Steers in the First 56 Days on Feed.确定到达时给予不同比例土拉霉素对周岁公牛在采食的前56天鼻咽微生物群和生产性能特征的影响。
Microorganisms. 2024 Dec 5;12(12):2512. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12122512.

本文引用的文献

1
Comprehensive Outcomes Affected by Antimicrobial Metaphylaxis of Feedlot Calves at Medium-Risk for Bovine Respiratory Disease from a Randomized Controlled Trial.一项随机对照试验中,抗菌药物预防性给药对处于牛呼吸道疾病中度风险的饲养场犊牛综合结局的影响
Vet Sci. 2023 Jan 17;10(2):67. doi: 10.3390/vetsci10020067.
2
The effects of administering different metaphylactic antimicrobials on growth performance and health outcomes of high-risk, newly received feedlot steers.给予不同预防性抗菌药物对高风险、新入栏育肥牛生长性能和健康状况的影响。
Transl Anim Sci. 2022 Oct 15;6(4):txac140. doi: 10.1093/tas/txac140. eCollection 2022 Oct.
3
Impact of bovine respiratory disease in U.S. beef cattle.
美国肉牛的牛呼吸道疾病的影响。
Anim Health Res Rev. 2020 Dec;21(2):132-134. doi: 10.1017/S1466252320000079. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
4
Net return distributions when metaphylaxis is used to control bovine respiratory disease in high health-risk cattle.在高健康风险牛群中使用群体预防措施控制牛呼吸道疾病时的净收益分布情况。
Transl Anim Sci. 2020 Feb 17;4(2):txaa020. doi: 10.1093/tas/txaa020. eCollection 2020 Apr.
5
Bovine Respiratory Disease: Looking Back and Looking Forward, What Do We See?牛呼吸道疾病:回顾与展望,我们看到了什么?
Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2020 Jul;36(2):239-251. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2020.03.009.
6
An evaluation of the economic effects of bovine respiratory disease on animal performance, carcass traits, and economic outcomes in feedlot cattle defined using four BRD diagnosis methods.使用四种 BRD 诊断方法评估牛呼吸道疾病对育肥牛的动物性能、胴体特征和经济结果的经济影响。
J Anim Sci. 2020 Feb 1;98(2). doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa005.
7
Market Impacts of Reducing the Prevalence of Bovine Respiratory Disease in United States Beef Cattle Feedlots.降低美国肉牛饲养场牛呼吸道疾病患病率对市场的影响。
Front Vet Sci. 2017 Nov 9;4:189. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00189. eCollection 2017.
8
A mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis of metaphylaxis treatments for bovine respiratory disease in beef cattle.肉牛牛呼吸道疾病预防性治疗的混合治疗比较荟萃分析。
J Anim Sci. 2017 Feb;95(2):626-635. doi: 10.2527/jas.2016.1062.
9
Use of Antimicrobial Metaphylaxis for the Control of Bovine Respiratory Disease in High-Risk Cattle.使用抗菌药物预防性给药控制高危牛群的牛呼吸道疾病
Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2015 Nov;31(3):341-50, v. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2015.05.008. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
10
The epidemiology of bovine respiratory disease: What is the evidence for predisposing factors?牛呼吸道疾病的流行病学:诱发因素的证据有哪些?
Can Vet J. 2010 Oct;51(10):1095-102.