Johnson Blaine T, White Brad J, Amachawadi Raghavendra G, Kleinhenz Michael D, Farney Jaymelynn K, Shippy Teresa D, Larson Robert L
School of Veterinary Medicine, Texas Tech University, Amarillo, TX 79106, USA.
Beef Cattle Institute, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.
Microorganisms. 2024 Dec 5;12(12):2512. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12122512.
Metaphylaxis or treating the entire population of cattle at arrival with an antimicrobial has been studied extensively in the cattle industry; however, little information is available on the impacts of treating only a proportion of the population with antimicrobials at arrival. The study objective was to determine potential associations between the proportion of animals in a pen treated with antimicrobial therapy with pen performance and nasopharyngeal microbiome. Yearling steers (n = 160) were randomly allocated to study pens (n = 40) and pens were systematically randomized to one of two antimicrobial treatments (META: all four head received tulathromycin; MIXED: two of four head randomly selected to receive tulathromycin). The study was conducted in conjunction with an essential oil feeding trial. Deep nasal pharyngeal (DNP) swabs were collected from every steer at Days 0, 14, 28, and 56. All DNP swabs were individually cultured for and . Samples of DNA were extracted from DNP swabs, pooled by pen, and analyzed by metagenomic shotgun sequencing to compare nasopharyngeal microbiome composition and quantity of resistance genes between test groups. Neither antimicrobial nor essential oil treatment groups had any significant associations with performance or DNP microbiome. Sampling day was significantly associated with alpha and beta diversity at the species level. Shannon's diversity and Inverse Simpson diversity were significantly lower on Day 14 versus both Day 0 and Day 56. These data indicated a shift in microbial populations across study days; however, the microbiome diversity and relative abundance were not significantly different between antimicrobial treatment groups.
在养牛业中,已经对群体预防或在牛抵达时用抗菌药物治疗整个牛群进行了广泛研究;然而,关于在抵达时仅对一部分牛群使用抗菌药物治疗的影响,现有信息很少。本研究的目的是确定在栏舍中接受抗菌治疗的动物比例与栏舍性能和鼻咽微生物群之间的潜在关联。将一岁公牛(n = 160)随机分配到研究栏舍(n = 40),并将栏舍系统随机分为两种抗菌治疗方案之一(META:所有四头牛均接受土拉霉素;MIXED:从四头牛中随机选择两头接受土拉霉素)。该研究与一项精油喂养试验同时进行。在第0、14、28和56天从每头公牛采集深鼻咽(DNP)拭子。所有DNP拭子均单独培养用于[此处原文缺失培养相关内容]。从DNP拭子中提取DNA样本,按栏舍汇集,并通过宏基因组鸟枪法测序进行分析,以比较测试组之间的鼻咽微生物群组成和耐药基因数量。抗菌药物治疗组和精油治疗组与性能或DNP微生物群均无显著关联。采样日与物种水平的α多样性和β多样性显著相关。与第0天和第56天相比,第14天的香农多样性和反辛普森多样性显著更低。这些数据表明整个研究期间微生物群体发生了变化;然而,抗菌治疗组之间的微生物群多样性和相对丰度没有显著差异。