Freytag Hannah, Kapalla Marvin, Berg Floris, Stroth Hans-Christian Arne, Reisenauer Tessa, Stoklasa Kerstin, Zimmermann Alexander, Reeps Christian, Knappich Christoph, Wolk Steffen, Busch Albert
Department for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany.
Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department for Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus and University Hospital, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
J Clin Med. 2024 May 10;13(10):2817. doi: 10.3390/jcm13102817.
: A popliteal artery aneurysm (PAA) is traditionally treated by an open PAA repair (OPAR) with a popliteo-popliteal venous graft interposition. Although excellent outcomes have been reported in elective cases, the results are much worse in cases of emergency presentation or with the necessity of adjunct procedures. This study aimed to identify the risk factors that might decrease amputation-free survival (efficacy endpoint) and lower graft patency (technical endpoint). : A dual-center retrospective analysis was performed from 2000 to 2021 covering all consecutive PAA repairs stratified for elective vs. emergency repair, considering the patient (i.e., age and comorbidities), PAA (i.e., diameter and tibial runoff vessels), and procedural characteristics (i.e., procedure time, material, and bypass configuration). Descriptive, univariate, and multivariate statistics were used. : In 316 patients (69.8 ± 10.5 years), 395 PAAs (mean diameter 31.9 ± 12.9 mm) were operated, 67 as an emergency procedure (6× rupture; 93.8% severe acute limb ischemia). The majority had OPAR (366 procedures). Emergency patients had worse pre- and postoperative tibial runoff, longer procedure times, and more complex reconstructions harboring a variety of adjunct procedures as well as more medical and surgical complications (all < 0.001). Overall, the in-hospital major amputation rate and mortality rate were 3.6% and 0.8%, respectively. The median follow-up was 49 months. Five-year primary and secondary patency rates were 80% and 94.7%. Patency for venous grafts outperformed alloplastic and composite reconstructions ( < 0.001), but prolonged the average procedure time by 51.4 (24.3-78.6) min ( < 0.001). Amputation-free survival was significantly better after elective procedures ( < 0.001), but only during the early (in-hospital) phase. An increase in patient age and any medical complications were significant negative predictors, regardless of the aneurysm size. : A popliteo-popliteal vein interposition remains the gold standard for treatment despite a probably longer procedure time for both elective and emergency PAA repairs. To determine the most effective treatment strategies for older and probably frailer patients, factors such as the aneurysm size and the patient's overall condition should be considered.
腘动脉瘤(PAA)传统上通过开放性腘动脉瘤修复术(OPAR)并置入腘-腘静脉移植物进行治疗。尽管在择期手术病例中报告了出色的治疗效果,但在急诊手术病例或需要辅助手术的情况下,结果要差得多。本研究旨在确定可能降低无截肢生存率(疗效终点)和降低移植物通畅率(技术终点)的危险因素。:对2000年至2021年进行的一项双中心回顾性分析,涵盖所有连续的PAA修复手术,根据择期与急诊修复进行分层,同时考虑患者因素(即年龄和合并症)、PAA因素(即直径和胫后血管)以及手术特征(即手术时间、材料和旁路配置)。使用了描述性、单变量和多变量统计方法。:在316例患者(69.8±10.5岁)中,对395个PAA(平均直径31.9±12.9mm)进行了手术,其中67例为急诊手术(6例破裂;93.8%为严重急性肢体缺血)。大多数患者接受了OPAR(366例手术)。急诊患者术前和术后的胫后血管情况较差,手术时间较长,重建更为复杂,需要进行各种辅助手术,且医疗和手术并发症更多(所有P<0.001)。总体而言,住院期间的大截肢率和死亡率分别为3.6%和0.8%。中位随访时间为49个月。5年的一期和二期通畅率分别为80%和94.7%。静脉移植物的通畅率优于异体和复合重建(P<0.001),但平均手术时间延长了51.4(24.3-78.6)分钟(P<0.001)。择期手术后的无截肢生存率明显更高(P<0.001),但仅在早期(住院期间)阶段如此。患者年龄增加和任何医疗并发症都是显著的负性预测因素,与动脉瘤大小无关。:尽管对于择期和急诊PAA修复手术,腘-腘静脉置入术的手术时间可能更长,但它仍然是治疗的金标准。为了确定针对年龄较大且可能身体虚弱的患者最有效的治疗策略,应考虑动脉瘤大小和患者整体状况等因素。