• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

剂量递增可增强体外震波治疗对跑者足底筋膜炎的治疗潜力。

Dose Escalation Can Enhance the Therapeutic Potential of Radial Extracorporeal Shock-Wave Therapy in the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis in Runners.

机构信息

Faculty of Medical and Social Sciences, Warsaw Medical Academy of Applied Sciences, 8 Rydygiera St., 01-793 Warszawa, Poland.

Collegium Medicum im dr Władysława Biegańskiego, Jan Długosz University in Częstochowa, 13/15 Armii Krajowej St., 42-200 Częstochowa, Poland.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 May 6;60(5):766. doi: 10.3390/medicina60050766.

DOI:10.3390/medicina60050766
PMID:38792948
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11123367/
Abstract

Treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis is challenging given that there are various of available treatment options with no clear gold standard. The aim of the study was to examine the dose-escalation effect of rESWT on the biomechanical parameters of the plantar fascia and pain ailments. In the experimental group ( = 30), the intensity of the shock wave was increased every two subsequent treatment sessions. In the control group ( = 32), the treatment parameters were not changed. In both groups, six treatments were performed, with two treatment sessions a week. In order to assess the biomechanical parameters of the plantar fascia, myotonometric measurements were performed. The pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The tension of the plantar fascia attachment in the experimental group decreased from 27.69 ± 2.06 [Hz] before treatment to 26.29 ± 1.69 [Hz] after treatment ( = 0.009) and to 26.03 ± 2.15 [Hz] 1 month after the beginning of treatment ( = 0.003). In the control group, the frequency results did not change significantly ( > 0.05). Flexibility increased in both groups. The test results before treatment and 1 month after the beginning of the treatment showed statistical significance in the experimental group ( = 0.001) vs. ( = 0.002) in the control group. The differences were not statistically significant between groups ( > 0.05). The assessment of pain intensity carried out 1 month after the end of treatment in the experimental group amounted to 3.14 ± 2.28 points, which was statistically significantly lower compared to that in the control group, where it amounted to 5.14 ± 1.92 points. ( < 0.001). The use of rESWT performed with an increasing intensity of impact during subsequent treatment procedures demonstrated greater effectiveness in improving the biomechanical parameters of the plantar fascia and was also more effective in reducing the pain ailments. Our results are encouraging. The dose escalation in the treatment cycle is worth considering. To prove that this method of treatment is more effective, a randomized controlled trial should be carried out on a representative sample.

摘要

治疗慢性足底筋膜炎具有挑战性,因为有多种治疗方法可供选择,没有明确的金标准。本研究旨在探讨 rESWT 对足底筋膜生物力学参数和疼痛疾病的递增剂量效应。实验组(n=30)的冲击波强度在随后的两次治疗中逐渐增加。对照组(n=32)的治疗参数没有改变。两组均进行 6 次治疗,每周 2 次治疗。为了评估足底筋膜的生物力学参数,进行了肌电测量。使用视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估疼痛强度。实验组足底筋膜附着处的张力从治疗前的 27.69±2.06[Hz]下降到治疗后的 26.29±1.69[Hz](=0.009)和治疗开始后 1 个月的 26.03±2.15[Hz](=0.003)。对照组的频率结果没有明显变化(>0.05)。两组的柔韧性均增加。实验组治疗前和治疗开始后 1 个月的测试结果具有统计学意义(=0.001)与对照组(=0.002)相比。组间差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。实验组治疗结束后 1 个月评估的疼痛强度为 3.14±2.28 分,明显低于对照组的 5.14±1.92 分(<0.001)。rESWT 治疗过程中随着冲击强度的增加,改善了足底筋膜的生物力学参数,也更有效地减轻了疼痛症状。我们的结果令人鼓舞。在治疗周期中增加剂量值得考虑。为了证明这种治疗方法更有效,应该在有代表性的样本中进行随机对照试验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c897/11123367/120ad5d1e526/medicina-60-00766-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c897/11123367/9cead782845e/medicina-60-00766-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c897/11123367/0b1116204908/medicina-60-00766-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c897/11123367/120ad5d1e526/medicina-60-00766-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c897/11123367/9cead782845e/medicina-60-00766-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c897/11123367/0b1116204908/medicina-60-00766-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c897/11123367/120ad5d1e526/medicina-60-00766-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Dose Escalation Can Enhance the Therapeutic Potential of Radial Extracorporeal Shock-Wave Therapy in the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis in Runners.剂量递增可增强体外震波治疗对跑者足底筋膜炎的治疗潜力。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 May 6;60(5):766. doi: 10.3390/medicina60050766.
2
The effectiveness of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT), sham-rESWT, standardised exercise programme or usual care for patients with plantar fasciopathy: study protocol for a double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled trial.跟骨足底筋膜炎患者采用体外震波治疗(rESWT)、假体外震波治疗、标准化运动方案或常规护理的疗效比较:一项双盲、随机、对照 sham 试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Jun 29;21(1):589. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04510-z.
3
A comparison of the effectiveness of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy and ultrasound therapy in the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis: a randomized controlled trial.桡侧体外冲击波疗法与超声疗法治疗慢性足底筋膜炎的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验
J Med Assoc Thai. 2015 Jan;98 Suppl 1:S49-56.
4
A comparative analysis of analgesic efficacy of ultrasound and shock wave therapy in the treatment of patients with inflammation of the attachment of the plantar fascia in the course of calcaneal spurs.超声与冲击波疗法治疗跟骨骨刺伴足底筋膜附着处炎症患者的镇痛疗效比较分析
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 Sep;136(9):1289-1296. doi: 10.1007/s00402-016-2503-z. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
5
Sonoelastographic evaluation of plantar fascia after shock wave therapy for recalcitrant plantar fasciitis: A 12-month longitudinal follow-up study.超声弹性成像评价冲击波治疗顽固性足底筋膜炎后足底筋膜的变化:一项 12 个月的纵向随访研究。
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 13;10(1):2571. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59464-8.
6
Comparative Effectiveness of Radial Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy and Ultrasound-Guided Local Corticosteroid Injection Treatment for Plantar Fasciitis.桡侧体外冲击波疗法与超声引导下局部注射皮质类固醇治疗足底筋膜炎的疗效比较
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2017 May;107(3):192-199. doi: 10.7547/14-114.
7
[Comparison between extracorporeal shockwave therapy and radial pressure wave therapy in plantar fasciitis].体外冲击波疗法与径向压力波疗法治疗足底筋膜炎的比较
Rehabilitacion (Madr). 2020 Jan-Mar;54(1):11-18. doi: 10.1016/j.rh.2019.09.002. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
8
Ultrasonography and clinical outcome comparison of extracorporeal shock wave therapy and corticosteroid injections for chronic plantar fasciitis: A randomized controlled trial.体外冲击波疗法与皮质类固醇注射治疗慢性足底筋膜炎的超声检查与临床结果比较:一项随机对照试验
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2018 Mar 1;18(1):47-54.
9
Comparison of extracorporeal shock wave therapy with botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of plantar fasciitis.体外冲击波疗法与A型肉毒毒素治疗足底筋膜炎的比较。
Disabil Rehabil. 2016 Oct;38(21):2114-21. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1114036. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
10
Comparing Myofascial Pain Syndrome Treatment with Dry Needling Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Plantar Fasciitis on Pain and Function of the Heel.比较肌筋膜疼痛综合征治疗中干针与体外冲击波治疗足底筋膜炎对足跟疼痛和功能的影响。
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2024 Jul-Aug;63(4):477-481. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2024.02.008. Epub 2024 Mar 12.

引用本文的文献

1
rESWT in Shoulder Periarthritis: Does the Protocol Intensity Matter?-A Quasi-Experimental Non-Randomized Comparative Study.体外冲击波疗法治疗肩周炎:治疗方案强度是否重要?——一项半实验性非随机对照研究
Life (Basel). 2025 Jun 6;15(6):922. doi: 10.3390/life15060922.

本文引用的文献

1
From Muscle to the Myofascial Unit: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.从肌肉到肌筋膜单位:当前证据与未来展望。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Feb 24;24(5):4527. doi: 10.3390/ijms24054527.
2
Are models of plantar heel pain suitable for competitive runners? A narrative review.足底足跟痛模型适用于竞技跑步者吗?一项叙述性综述。
J Orthop. 2022 Jun 21;33:9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.06.011. eCollection 2022 Sep-Oct.
3
Feasibility of Using a Portable MyotonPRO Device to Quantify the Elastic Properties of Skeletal Muscle.使用便携式 MyotonPRO 设备定量评估骨骼肌弹性特性的可行性。
Med Sci Monit. 2022 Jan 28;28:e934121. doi: 10.12659/MSM.934121.
4
Sample size determination and power analysis using the G*Power software.使用 G*Power 软件进行样本量确定和功效分析。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2021;18:17. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.17. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
5
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy: an update.体外冲击波疗法:最新进展
EFORT Open Rev. 2020 Oct 26;5(10):584-592. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190067. eCollection 2020 Oct.
6
Measures of Foot Pain, Foot Function, and General Foot Health.足部疼痛、足部功能及足部整体健康的测量指标。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020 Oct;72 Suppl 10:294-320. doi: 10.1002/acr.24208.
7
Outcomes of platelet-rich plasma for plantar fasciopathy: a best-evidence synthesis.富含血小板的血浆治疗足底筋膜炎的疗效:最佳证据综合。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Sep 21;15(1):432. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01783-7.
8
Comparison of Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in Plantar Fasciitis Treatment Using Two Different Frequencies.两种不同频率的桡侧体外冲击波疗法治疗足底筋膜炎的比较
Cureus. 2020 May 26;12(5):e8284. doi: 10.7759/cureus.8284.
9
The effectiveness of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT), sham-rESWT, standardised exercise programme or usual care for patients with plantar fasciopathy: study protocol for a double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled trial.跟骨足底筋膜炎患者采用体外震波治疗(rESWT)、假体外震波治疗、标准化运动方案或常规护理的疗效比较:一项双盲、随机、对照 sham 试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Jun 29;21(1):589. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04510-z.
10
Comparing the Role of Different Treatment Modalities for Plantar Fasciitis: A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.比较不同治疗方式对足底筋膜炎的作用:一项双盲随机对照试验。
Indian J Orthop. 2020 Jan 20;54(1):31-37. doi: 10.1007/s43465-019-00038-w. eCollection 2020 Feb.