Ko Chih-Yuan, Tsai Chun-Hao, Fong Yi-Chin, Chen Hui-Yi, Chen Hsien-Te, Lin Tsung-Li
Department of Orthopedics, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40447, Taiwan.
Graduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan.
J Pers Med. 2024 May 3;14(5):490. doi: 10.3390/jpm14050490.
Two-stage revision with an antibiotic-loaded cement articulating spacer is a standard treatment for chronic prosthetic knee infection (PKI); however, mechanical complications can occur during the spacer period. There is limited evidence on the association between surgeon volume and mechanical complications after resection arthroplasty (RA) using an articulating spacer. This study aimed to compare the rates of mechanical complications and reoperation after RA with articulating spacers by surgeons with high volumes (HV) and low volumes (LV) of RA performed and analyzed the risk factors for mechanical failure. The retrospective study investigated 203 patients treated with PKIs who underwent RA with articulating spacers and were divided according to the number of RAs performed by the surgeons: HV (≥14 RAs/year) or LV (<14 RAs/year). Rates of mechanical complications and reoperations were compared. Risk factors for mechanical complications were analyzed. Of the 203 patients, 105 and 98 were treated by two HV and six LV surgeons, respectively. The mechanical complication rate was lower in HV surgeons (3.8%) than in LV surgeons (36.7%) ( < 0.001). The reoperation rate for mechanical complications was lower in HV surgeons (0.9%) than in LV surgeons (24.5%) ( < 0.001). Additionally, 47.2% of patients required hinge knees after mechanical spacer failure. Medial proximal tibial angle < 87°, recurvatum angle > 5°, and the use of a tibial spacer without a cement stem extension were risk factors for mechanical complications. Based on these findings, we made the following three conclusions: (1) HV surgeons had a lower rate of mechanical complications and reoperation than LV surgeons; (2) mechanical complications increased the level of constraint in final revision knee arthroplasty; and (3) all surgeons should avoid tibial spacer varus malalignment and recurvatum deformity and always use a cement stem extension with a tibial spacer.
采用含抗生素骨水泥活动型间隔物的两阶段翻修术是慢性人工膝关节感染(PKI)的标准治疗方法;然而,在使用间隔物期间可能会出现机械并发症。关于行切除关节成形术(RA)并使用活动型间隔物后外科医生手术量与机械并发症之间的关联,证据有限。本研究旨在比较高手术量(HV,每年≥14例RA)和低手术量(LV,每年<14例RA)的外科医生在RA并使用活动型间隔物后机械并发症和再次手术的发生率,并分析机械故障的危险因素。这项回顾性研究调查了203例行PKI治疗且接受RA并使用活动型间隔物的患者,并根据外科医生所进行的RA数量进行分组:HV组(每年≥14例RA)或LV组(每年<14例RA)。比较了机械并发症和再次手术的发生率。分析了机械并发症的危险因素。在这203例患者中,分别有105例和98例由2名HV外科医生和6名LV外科医生治疗。HV外科医生的机械并发症发生率(3.8%)低于LV外科医生(36.7%)(<0.001)。HV外科医生因机械并发症进行再次手术的发生率(0.9%)低于LV外科医生(24.5%)(<0.001)。此外,47.2%的患者在机械性间隔物失效后需要使用铰链膝关节。胫骨近端内侧角<87°、后凸角>5°以及使用无骨水泥柄延长的胫骨间隔物是机械并发症的危险因素。基于这些发现,我们得出以下三个结论:(1)HV外科医生的机械并发症和再次手术发生率低于LV外科医生;(2)机械并发症增加了最终翻修膝关节置换术的约束水平;(3)所有外科医生都应避免胫骨间隔物内翻畸形和后凸畸形,并始终使用带骨水泥柄延长的胫骨间隔物。