• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

补充营养援助计划对含糖饮料的限制是否有效降低购买或消费?系统评价。

Are Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Restrictions on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Effective in Reducing Purchase or Consumption? A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Division of Computational & Data Sciences, Washington University in St Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA.

Brown School, Washington University in St Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2024 May 12;16(10):1459. doi: 10.3390/nu16101459.

DOI:10.3390/nu16101459
PMID:38794697
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11123964/
Abstract

The participants in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) consume greater amounts of sugar and sweetened beverages (SSBs) compared to non-eligible individuals, which could result in potential negative health outcomes. This can be attributed to the lack of restrictions on SSB purchases with SNAP benefits. In view of the increasing calls from advocates and policymakers to restrict the purchase of SSBs with SNAP benefits, we performed a systematic review to assess its impact towards SSB purchases and consumption. We searched articles from five databases-Cochrane, EBSCO, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and PubMed-and selected seven studies, four of which were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and three were simulation modeling studies. All three simulation studies and one RCT reported outcomes in terms of consumption, while the other three RCTs reported outcomes in terms of purchases. All seven studies found that an SSB restriction led to a decrease in SSB consumption or purchases, with six studies reporting significant results. Nonetheless, limitations exist. These include limited studies on this subject, potential workarounds circumventing SSB restrictions, like making purchases using personal cash, potentially differed estimated effects when combined with incentives or other initiatives, and the limited geographical scope among the selected RCTs.

摘要

参与补充营养援助计划(SNAP)的人比不符合条件的人消耗更多的糖和含糖饮料(SSB),这可能导致潜在的健康后果。这可能是由于 SNAP 福利对 SSB 购买没有限制。鉴于倡导者和政策制定者越来越多地呼吁限制 SNAP 福利购买 SSB,我们进行了系统评价,以评估其对 SSB 购买和消费的影响。我们从五个数据库(Cochrane、EBSCO、SCOPUS、Web of Science 和 PubMed)中搜索了文章,并选择了七项研究,其中四项是随机对照试验(RCT),三项是模拟建模研究。所有三项模拟研究和一项 RCT 都报告了消费方面的结果,而另外三项 RCT 则报告了购买方面的结果。所有七项研究都发现,SSB 限制导致 SSB 消费或购买减少,其中六项研究报告了显著结果。然而,存在一些局限性。这些限制包括针对这一主题的研究有限,可能会有规避 SSB 限制的解决方法,例如使用个人现金购买,与激励措施或其他举措结合时估计效果可能不同,以及选定 RCT 的地理范围有限。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2393/11123964/fef9f6417d93/nutrients-16-01459-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2393/11123964/fef9f6417d93/nutrients-16-01459-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2393/11123964/fef9f6417d93/nutrients-16-01459-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Are Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Restrictions on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Effective in Reducing Purchase or Consumption? A Systematic Review.补充营养援助计划对含糖饮料的限制是否有效降低购买或消费?系统评价。
Nutrients. 2024 May 12;16(10):1459. doi: 10.3390/nu16101459.
2
Chile's 2014 sugar-sweetened beverage tax and changes in prices and purchases of sugar-sweetened beverages: An observational study in an urban environment.智利 2014 年含糖饮料税与含糖饮料价格和购买量的变化:城市环境下的观察性研究。
PLoS Med. 2018 Jul 3;15(7):e1002597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002597. eCollection 2018 Jul.
3
Taxing sugar-sweetened beverages as a policy to reduce overweight and obesity in countries of different income classifications: a systematic review.对含糖饮料征税以减少不同收入分类国家超重和肥胖的政策:系统评价。
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Nov;24(16):5550-5560. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021002901. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
4
Nutritional labelling for healthier food or non-alcoholic drink purchasing and consumption.用于更健康食品或非酒精饮料购买及消费的营养标签。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 27;2(2):CD009315. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009315.pub2.
5
Portion, package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco.用于改变食品、酒精饮料和烟草的选择及消费量的份量、包装或餐具尺寸。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 14;2015(9):CD011045. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011045.pub2.
6
Compression for venous leg ulcers.腿部静脉溃疡的压迫治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11(11):CD000265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000265.pub3.
7
The potential impact of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) restrictions on expenditures: a systematic review.补充营养援助计划(SNAP)限制对支出的潜在影响:一项系统综述。
Public Health Nutr. 2016 Dec;19(17):3216-3231. doi: 10.1017/S1368980015003511. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
8
Effectiveness of school-based approaches for reduction of sugar and sugar-sweetened beverages in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于学校的减少儿童糖和含糖饮料摄入方法的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Evid Based Dent. 2025 Feb 5. doi: 10.1038/s41432-024-01103-6.
9
Incentives for preventing smoking in children and adolescents.预防儿童和青少年吸烟的激励措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 6;6(6):CD008645. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008645.pub3.
10
Does It Really Reduce Obesity? Substitution Effects of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax-Empirical Evidence From China.它真的能减少肥胖吗?含糖饮料税的替代效应——来自中国的实证证据。
J Nutr. 2025 May 23. doi: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.05.019.

本文引用的文献

1
Using Mobile Phone Data to Assess Socio-Economic Disparities in Unhealthy Food Reliance during the COVID-19 Pandemic.利用手机数据评估新冠疫情期间不健康食品依赖方面的社会经济差异。
Health Data Sci. 2023 Dec 15;3:0101. doi: 10.34133/hds.0101. eCollection 2023.
2
Effects of Inclusion of Food Purchase Restrictions and Incentives in a Food Benefit Program on Diet Quality and Food Purchasing: Results From a Randomized Trial.食品福利计划中包含食品购买限制和激励措施对饮食质量和食品购买的影响:一项随机试验的结果。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2024 May;124(5):569-582.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2023.11.024. Epub 2023 Dec 3.
3
Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption in Children: The Interplay of Household SNAP and WIC Participation.
儿童含糖饮料消费:家庭 SNAP 和 WIC 参与的相互作用。
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Nov;61(5):665-673. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.05.008.
4
Prevalence of Self-Reported Intake of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Among US Adults in 50 States and the District of Columbia, 2010 and 2015.美国 50 个州和哥伦比亚特区成年人在 2010 年和 2015 年报告摄入含糖饮料的流行率。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2021 Apr 15;18:E35. doi: 10.5888/pcd18.200434.
5
Impact of Restricting Sugar-Sweetened Beverages From the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program on Children's Health.限制《补充营养援助计划》中含糖饮料对儿童健康的影响。
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Feb;60(2):276-284. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.08.023. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
6
The US Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - Education improves nutrition-related behaviors.美国补充营养援助计划-教育改善了与营养相关的行为。
J Nutr Sci. 2020 Sep 30;9:e44. doi: 10.1017/jns.2020.37. eCollection 2020.
7
Trends in Cardiovascular Disease Prevalence by Income Level in the United States.美国不同收入水平人群中心血管疾病的患病趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Sep 1;3(9):e2018150. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.18150.
8
Examining disparities in diet quality between SNAP participants and non-participants using Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition analysis.使用瓦哈卡-布林德分解分析研究补充营养援助计划(SNAP)参与者与非参与者在饮食质量上的差异。
Prev Med Rep. 2020 May 28;19:101134. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101134. eCollection 2020 Sep.
9
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program participation and current restricted food expenditures: implications for policy.补充营养援助计划参与度和当前受限食品支出:对政策的影响。
Public Health Nutr. 2020 Dec;23(18):3448-3455. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020000749. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
10
Strengthening the Public Health Impacts of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Through Policy.通过政策加强补充营养援助计划对公共卫生的影响。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2020 Apr 2;41:453-480. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094143.