Suppr超能文献

自评健康、表观遗传衰老与澳大利亚老年人的长期死亡率。

Self-rated health, epigenetic ageing, and long-term mortality in older Australians.

机构信息

Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.

Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Geroscience. 2024 Dec;46(6):5505-5515. doi: 10.1007/s11357-024-01211-2. Epub 2024 May 25.

Abstract

Self-rated health (SRH) is a subjective indicator of overall health based on a single questionnaire item. Previous evidence found that it is a strong predictor of mortality, although the underlying mechanism is poorly understood. Epigenetic age is an objective, emerging biomarker of health, estimated using DNA methylation data at hundreds of sites across the genome. This study aimed to assess the overlap and interaction between SRH and epigenetic ageing in predicting mortality risk. We used DNA methylation data from 1059 participants in the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study (mean age: 69 years) to calculate three age-adjusted measures of epigenetic ageing: GrimAge, PhenoAge, and DunedinPACE. SRH was assessed using a five-category questionnaire item ("excellent, very good, good, fair, poor"). Cox models were used to assess the associations of SRH, epigenetic ageing, and their interaction, with all-cause mortality over up to 17 years of follow-up (N = 345). The association of SRH with mortality per category increase was HR = 1.29; 95%CI: 1.14-1.46. The association was slightly attenuated after adjusting for all three epigenetic ageing measures (HR = 1.25, 95%CI: 1.10-1.41). A strong gradient was observed in the association of GrimAge (P = 0.006) and DunedinPACE (P = 0.002) with mortality across worsening SRH strata. For example, the association between DunedinPACE and mortality in participants with "excellent" SRH was HR = 1.02, 95%CI: 0.73-1.43 and for "fair/poor" HR = 1.72, 95%CI: 1.35-2.20. SRH and epigenetic ageing were synergistic risk factors of mortality in our study. These findings suggest that consideration of subjective and objective factors may improve general health assessment, which has implications for the ongoing development of molecular markers of ageing.

摘要

自评健康 (SRH) 是一种基于单个问卷条目的整体健康的主观指标。先前的证据表明,它是死亡率的强有力预测指标,尽管其潜在机制尚不清楚。表观遗传年龄是一种基于基因组中数百个位点的 DNA 甲基化数据估计的健康的客观新兴生物标志物。本研究旨在评估 SRH 和表观遗传衰老在预测死亡率风险方面的重叠和相互作用。我们使用来自墨尔本合作队列研究(平均年龄:69 岁)的 1059 名参与者的 DNA 甲基化数据来计算三种年龄调整的表观遗传衰老测量值:GrimAge、PhenoAge 和 DunedinPACE。SRH 使用五分类问卷条目进行评估(“优秀、非常好、好、一般、差”)。Cox 模型用于评估 SRH、表观遗传衰老及其相互作用与长达 17 年随访期间全因死亡率的关联(N=345)。SRH 每增加一个类别与死亡率的关联 HR=1.29;95%CI:1.14-1.46。在调整所有三种表观遗传衰老测量值后,该关联略有减弱(HR=1.25,95%CI:1.10-1.41)。在 GrimAge(P=0.006)和 DunedinPACE(P=0.002)与 SRH 恶化分层中死亡率的关联中观察到很强的梯度。例如,在自评健康为“优秀”的参与者中,DunedinPACE 与死亡率的关联 HR=1.02,95%CI:0.73-1.43,而在自评健康为“一般/差”的参与者中 HR=1.72,95%CI:1.35-2.20。在我们的研究中,SRH 和表观遗传衰老都是死亡率的协同危险因素。这些发现表明,考虑主观和客观因素可能会改善整体健康评估,这对衰老的分子标志物的不断发展具有影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b66c/11493901/bd24c650fa14/11357_2024_1211_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验