• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于拉曼光谱和机器学习的胶质瘤组织鉴定效能的Meta 分析

Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Raman Spectroscopy and Machine-Learning-Based Identification of Glioma Tissue.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, Texas, USA.

Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, Texas, USA.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2024 Sep;189:26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.05.112. Epub 2024 May 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2024.05.112
PMID:38796149
Abstract

Intraoperative Raman spectroscopy (RS) has been identified as a potential tool for surgeons to rapidly and noninvasively differentiate between diseased and normal tissue. Since the previous meta-analysis on the subject was published in 2016, improvements in both spectroscopy equipment and machine learning models used to process spectra may have led to an increase in RS efficacy. Therefore, we decided to conduct a meta-analysis to determine the efficacy of RS when differentiating between glioma tissue and normal brain tissue. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed while conducting this meta-analysis. A search was conducted on PubMed and Web of Science for prospective and retrospective studies published between 2016 and 2022 using intraoperative RS and standard histology methods to differentiate between glioma and normal brain tissue. Meta-analyses of log odds ratios, sensitivity, and specificity were conducted in JASP using the random-effects model with restricted maximum likelihood estimation. A total of 9 studies met our inclusion criteria, comprising 673 patients and 8319 Raman spectra. Meta-analysis of log diagnostic odds ratios revealed high heterogeneity (I = 79.83%) and yielded a back-transformed diagnostic odds ratio of 76.71 (95% confidence interval: 39.57-148.71). Finally, meta-analysis for sensitivity and specificity of RS for glioma tissue showed high heterogeneity (I = 99.37% and 98.21%, respectively) and yielded an overall sensitivity of 95.3% (95% confidence interval: 91.0%-99.6%) and an overall specificity of 71.2% (95% confidence interval: 54.8%-87.6%). Calculation of a summary receiver operating curve yielded an overall area under the curve of 0.9265. Raman spectroscopy represents a promising tool for surgeons to quickly and accurately differentiate between healthy brain tissue and glioma tissue.

摘要

术中拉曼光谱(RS)已被确定为外科医生快速、无创地区分病变组织和正常组织的潜在工具。由于该主题的上一次荟萃分析发表于 2016 年,因此,用于处理光谱的光谱仪设备和机器学习模型的改进可能导致 RS 功效的提高。因此,我们决定进行一项荟萃分析,以确定 RS 在区分脑胶质瘤组织和正常脑组织方面的效果。在进行这项荟萃分析时,我们遵循了系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目的指南。在 PubMed 和 Web of Science 上进行了检索,以查找 2016 年至 2022 年期间使用术中 RS 和标准组织学方法来区分脑胶质瘤和正常脑组织的前瞻性和回顾性研究。使用 JASP 中的随机效应模型和受限极大似然估计对对数优势比、灵敏度和特异性进行荟萃分析。共有 9 项研究符合纳入标准,包括 673 名患者和 8319 个拉曼光谱。对对数诊断优势比的荟萃分析显示存在高度异质性(I=79.83%),并产生了一个转换后的诊断优势比为 76.71(95%置信区间:39.57-148.71)。最后,对 RS 用于脑胶质瘤组织的灵敏度和特异性的荟萃分析显示存在高度异质性(分别为 I=99.37%和 98.21%),并产生了总体灵敏度为 95.3%(95%置信区间:91.0%-99.6%)和总体特异性为 71.2%(95%置信区间:54.8%-87.6%)。计算综合接收者操作特征曲线得出的总体曲线下面积为 0.9265。拉曼光谱代表了外科医生快速、准确地区分健康脑组织和脑胶质瘤组织的一种很有前途的工具。

相似文献

1
Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Raman Spectroscopy and Machine-Learning-Based Identification of Glioma Tissue.基于拉曼光谱和机器学习的胶质瘤组织鉴定效能的Meta 分析
World Neurosurg. 2024 Sep;189:26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.05.112. Epub 2024 May 23.
2
Accuracy of Raman spectroscopy in differentiating brain tumor from normal brain tissue.拉曼光谱在区分脑肿瘤与正常脑组织方面的准确性。
Oncotarget. 2017 May 30;8(22):36824-36831. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15975.
3
Accuracy of Raman spectroscopy in discriminating normal brain tissue from brain tumor: A systematic review and meta-analysis.拉曼光谱在鉴别正常脑组织与脑肿瘤中的准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2025 Mar 15;329:125518. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2024.125518. Epub 2024 Nov 30.
4
Efficacy of raman spectroscopy in the diagnosis of kidney cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.拉曼光谱在肾癌诊断中的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 2;99(27):e20933. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020933.
5
Optical biopsy identification and grading of gliomas using label-free visible resonance Raman spectroscopy.利用无标记可见共振拉曼光谱对神经胶质瘤进行光学活检识别和分级。
J Biomed Opt. 2019 Sep;24(9):1-12. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.24.9.095001.
6
Diagnosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma by Raman spectroscopy provides high efficiency: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.拉曼光谱诊断肝内胆管细胞癌具有高效性:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jan 8;100(1):e23900. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023900.
7
Identification of pediatric brain neoplasms using Raman spectroscopy.利用拉曼光谱法鉴定儿童脑肿瘤
Pediatr Neurosurg. 2012;48(2):109-17. doi: 10.1159/000343285. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
Accuracy of Raman spectroscopy in discrimination of nasopharyngeal carcinoma from normal samples: a systematic review and meta-analysis.拉曼光谱技术鉴别鼻咽癌与正常组织的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2019 Jul;145(7):1811-1821. doi: 10.1007/s00432-019-02934-y. Epub 2019 May 14.
10
Magnetic resonance perfusion for differentiating low-grade from high-grade gliomas at first presentation.首次就诊时磁共振灌注成像用于鉴别低级别与高级别胶质瘤
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 22;1(1):CD011551. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011551.pub2.