• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高速涡轮手机和低速手机清洁脱落后的树脂对釉质表面粗糙度的影响。体外研究。

Enamel surface roughness following debonding resin clean up using high speed air-turbine and electric handpieces. In vitro study.

机构信息

Orthodontic Department, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.

Biomaterials Department, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2024 May 25;24(1):609. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04339-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12903-024-04339-x
PMID:38796434
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11127323/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

High speed electric handpieces have recently been growing in popularity among dental professionals. Advantages include smoother surface preparation and increased cutting efficiency.

AIM

The primary objective was to compare enamel surface roughness following resin cleanup after bracket debonding using highspeed air turbine versus electric handpiece. The secondary objective was to record the time needed for resin-clean up.

METHOD

Forty deidentified freshly extracted human premolars were cleaned and sectioned at the cement-enamel junction. The crowns were embedded in acrylic blocks. Enamel surface roughness parameters (Ra, Rz, Rp and Rv) were measured using a stylus profilometer. Brackets were bonded using a light-cure orthodontic adhesive and stored in distilled water for 24 h. Following bracket debonding, the specimens were randomly divided into 2 groups: First group: resin clean-up was carried out using a 12-fluted carbide bur mounted on a high-speed air turbine; and second group: where an electric handpiece was used. Surface roughness parameters were measured following resin clean up and after polishing using pumice and a rubber cup. Time needed for resin clean-up was recorded. Differences in enamel surface roughness and time between groups were compared using repeated measures ANOVA and independent samples t-test, respectively at P ≤ 0.05.

RESULTS

The electric handpiece groups showed significantly higher values for Ra, Rz and Rp both following resin cleanup and polishing. Time taken for resin cleanup was significantly longer for the electric handpiece group.

CONCLUSION

Considering both surface roughness and time, electric handpiece do not seem to add greater effectiveness or efficiency to resin cleanup following orthodontic bracket debonding.

摘要

背景

高速手机最近在牙科专业人员中越来越受欢迎。其优点包括更平滑的表面准备和更高的切割效率。

目的

主要目的是比较使用高速涡轮手机和电动手机去除托槽粘接后残留的树脂时釉质表面粗糙度。次要目的是记录去除树脂所需的时间。

方法

将 40 颗未标记的新鲜人前磨牙清洁并在牙釉质交界处切割。牙冠嵌入丙烯酸块中。使用触针轮廓仪测量釉质表面粗糙度参数(Ra、Rz、Rp 和 Rv)。使用光固化正畸粘接剂将托槽粘接,在蒸馏水中储存 24 小时。托槽去除后,将样本随机分为两组:第一组:使用高速涡轮手机上的 12 槽碳化钨车针进行树脂清洁;第二组:使用电动手机进行清洁。在进行树脂清洁和使用浮石和橡胶杯进行抛光后,测量表面粗糙度参数。记录去除树脂所需的时间。使用重复测量方差分析和独立样本 t 检验分别比较组间的釉质表面粗糙度和时间差异,P 值均≤0.05。

结果

电动手机组在进行树脂清洁和抛光后,Ra、Rz 和 Rp 的值均显著更高。电动手机组去除树脂所需的时间明显更长。

结论

考虑到表面粗糙度和时间,电动手机在去除正畸托槽粘接后的残留树脂方面似乎没有增加更大的效果或效率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd5b/11127323/f61079838a33/12903_2024_4339_Figb_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd5b/11127323/871c1b7bfa6e/12903_2024_4339_Figa_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd5b/11127323/f61079838a33/12903_2024_4339_Figb_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd5b/11127323/871c1b7bfa6e/12903_2024_4339_Figa_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd5b/11127323/f61079838a33/12903_2024_4339_Figb_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Enamel surface roughness following debonding resin clean up using high speed air-turbine and electric handpieces. In vitro study.高速涡轮手机和低速手机清洁脱落后的树脂对釉质表面粗糙度的影响。体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 May 25;24(1):609. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04339-x.
2
Effects of various debonding and adhesive clearance methods on enamel surface: an in vitro study.不同脱粘和粘结剂清除方法对牙釉质表面的影响:一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2017 Feb 27;17(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12903-017-0349-6.
3
In vitro evaluation of enamel surface roughness and morphology after orthodontic debonding: Traditional cleanup systems versus polymer bur.正畸去带后釉质表面粗糙度和形态的体外评估:传统清洁系统与聚合体车针。
Int Orthod. 2020 Sep;18(3):546-554. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2020.04.006. Epub 2020 May 31.
4
Enamel surface roughness of preferred debonding and polishing protocols.首选脱粘和抛光方案的牙釉质表面粗糙度
J Orthod. 2016 Mar;43(1):39-46. doi: 10.1179/1465313315Y.0000000009. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
5
Evaluation of enamel roughness after orthodontic debonding and clean-up procedures using zirconia, tungsten carbide, and white stone burs: an in vitro study.评价氧化锆、碳化钨和白宝石车针对正畸去带及清洁后牙釉质粗糙度的影响:一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Jul 13;23(1):478. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03194-6.
6
Effect of adhesive remnant removal on enamel topography after bracket debonding.托槽拆除后去除粘结剂残余物对牙釉质表面形态的影响。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2014 Nov-Dec;19(6):105-12. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.19.6.105-112.oar.
7
Enamel surface evaluation after bracket debonding and different resin removal methods.托槽拆除及不同树脂去除方法后的釉质表面评估
Dental Press J Orthod. 2015 Mar-Apr;20(2):61-7. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.20.2.061-067.oar.
8
Enamel surface morphology after bracket debonding.托槽拆除后的釉质表面形态
ASDC J Dent Child. 1998 Sep-Oct;65(5):313-7, 354.
9
A Comparative Evaluation of Enamel Surface Roughness of Two Different Bonding Adhesives After Debonding With Atomic Force Microscopy.使用原子力显微镜对两种不同粘结剂脱粘后牙釉质表面粗糙度的比较评估
Cureus. 2022 Nov 18;14(11):e31661. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31661. eCollection 2022 Nov.
10
Efficiency of different protocols for enamel clean-up after bracket debonding: an in vitro study.不同方法用于去除托槽粘结后牙釉质清理的效率:一项体外研究
Dental Press J Orthod. 2015 Oct;20(5):78-85. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.20.5.078-085.oar.

引用本文的文献

1
Chair-Time During Polishing with Different Burs and Drills After Cement Customized Brackets Bonding: An In Vitro Comparative Study.定制粘结水门汀托槽后使用不同车针和钻头抛光时的椅旁操作时间:一项体外对比研究
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Jul 28;13(8):347. doi: 10.3390/dj13080347.

本文引用的文献

1
Ortho-Perio Risk Assessment and timing flowchart for lingual orthodontics in an interdisciplinary adult ortho-perio patient: A case report of "Perio-Guided" Orthodontic treatment.成人正畸-牙周跨学科患者舌侧正畸的正畸-牙周风险评估与时机流程图:“牙周引导”正畸治疗病例报告
Int Orthod. 2022 Mar;20(1):100598. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2021.10.006. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
2
In vitro evaluation of enamel surface roughness and morphology after orthodontic debonding: Traditional cleanup systems versus polymer bur.正畸去带后釉质表面粗糙度和形态的体外评估:传统清洁系统与聚合体车针。
Int Orthod. 2020 Sep;18(3):546-554. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2020.04.006. Epub 2020 May 31.
3
Comparison of crown fit and operator preferences between tooth preparation with electric and air-turbine handpieces.
电动和涡轮手机进行牙体预备后全冠适合性及术者偏好的比较
J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Jan;125(1):111-116. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.11.001. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
4
Evaluation of Enamel Surface Roughness after Various Finishing Techniques for Debonding of Orthodontic Brackets.正畸托槽去除后不同抛光技术对牙釉质表面粗糙度的评估。
Turk J Orthod. 2016 Mar;29(1):1-5. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2016.15-00016R1. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
5
Enamel Surface Roughness after Debonding: A Comparative Study using Three Different Burs.脱粘后牙釉质表面粗糙度:使用三种不同车针的比较研究
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018 May 1;19(5):521-526.
6
Development of a novel bioactive glass for air-abrasion to selectively remove orthodontic adhesives.开发一种新型的用于空气喷砂的生物活性玻璃,以选择性去除正畸胶粘剂。
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 May;22(4):1839-1849. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2279-8. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
7
Enamel surface roughness of preferred debonding and polishing protocols.首选脱粘和抛光方案的牙釉质表面粗糙度
J Orthod. 2016 Mar;43(1):39-46. doi: 10.1179/1465313315Y.0000000009. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
8
Effect of orthodontic debonding and adhesive removal on the enamel - current knowledge and future perspectives - a systematic review.正畸托槽拆除及粘结剂去除对牙釉质的影响——当前认知与未来展望——一项系统评价
Med Sci Monit. 2014 Oct 20;20:1991-2001. doi: 10.12659/MSM.890912.
9
Influence of oscillating and rotary cutting instruments with electric and turbine handpieces on tooth preparation surfaces.电动和涡轮手机的振荡及旋转切割器械对牙体预备表面的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Jul;112(1):51-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.02.007. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
10
How to do random allocation (randomization).如何进行随机分配(随机化)。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2014 Mar;6(1):103-9. doi: 10.4055/cios.2014.6.1.103. Epub 2014 Feb 14.