Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China.
Department of Clinical Oncology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong, China.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Oct;31(10):6635-6644. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15458-8. Epub 2024 May 25.
This study compared the surgical conversion rate and overall survival (OS) between induction chemotherapy (iC) and induction immunochemotherapy (iIC) for patients with initially unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (iuESCC).
In this multicenter, retrospective cohort study, patients from four high-volume institutions with unresectable diseases were included. The primary endpoints were the conversion surgery rate and OS. A multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to identify the independent significant prognostic factors associated with OS. The stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to confirm the survival comparison between the iIC and iC cohorts.
A total of 309 patients (150 in the iIC cohort and 159 in the iC cohort) were included. A significantly higher conversion surgical rate was observed in the iIC cohort (iIC vs. iC: 127/150, 84.7% vs. 79/159, 49.7%, P < 0.001). The pathological complete response rates were 22.0% and 5.1% in the iIC and the iC cohorts, respectively (P = 0.001). A significant difference in the OS was observed between the iIC (not reached) and iC cohorts (median 95% CI 36.3 [range 27.2-45.5]). The stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting yielded similar results. Regimen (iIC vs. iC, HR 0.215, 95% CI 0.102-0.454, P < 0.001) and operation (yes vs. no, HR 0.262, 95% CI 0.161-0.427, P < 0.001) were the significant prognostic factors for OS.
Immunochemotherapy plus conversion surgery in the induction setting may be a better treatment option to achieve high pathological responses and improve OS in iuESCC patients.
本研究比较了初始不可切除食管鳞癌(iuESCC)患者接受诱导化疗(iC)和诱导免疫化疗(iIC)的手术转化率和总生存期(OS)。
本多中心回顾性队列研究纳入了来自四家高容量机构的不可切除疾病患者。主要终点是转化率和 OS。采用多变量 Cox 回归分析确定与 OS 相关的独立显著预后因素。应用稳定逆概率治疗加权法(stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting,SIPTW)确认 iIC 和 iC 队列之间的生存比较。
共纳入 309 例患者(iIC 队列 150 例,iC 队列 159 例)。iIC 队列的转化率明显更高(iIC 比 iC:127/150,84.7%比 79/159,49.7%,P<0.001)。iIC 和 iC 队列的病理完全缓解率分别为 22.0%和 5.1%(P=0.001)。iIC(未达到)和 iC 队列的 OS 存在显著差异(中位 95%CI 36.3[范围 27.2-45.5])。SIPTW 也得到了类似的结果。方案(iIC 比 iC,HR 0.215,95%CI 0.102-0.454,P<0.001)和手术(是比否,HR 0.262,95%CI 0.161-0.427,P<0.001)是 OS 的显著预后因素。
诱导治疗中免疫化疗加转化手术可能是一种更好的治疗选择,可以提高 iuESCC 患者的高病理缓解率和 OS。