• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头孢唑林预防用药时间长短对关节置换术后小鼠模型的感染风险没有影响。

Duration of cefazolin prophylaxis did not impact infection risk in a murine model of joint arthroplasty.

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Division of Clinical Microbiology, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

J Orthop Res. 2024 Oct;42(10):2345-2352. doi: 10.1002/jor.25903. Epub 2024 May 26.

DOI:10.1002/jor.25903
PMID:38796743
Abstract

To minimize periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) risk, some clinicians prescribe extended antibiotic prophylaxis (EAP) following total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Given the limited evidence supporting EAP, we sought to evaluate impact of prophylactic antibiotic duration on PJI risk in a murine TJA model. A titanium prosthesis was implanted into the proximal tibia of 89 mice and inoculated with 10 colony forming units (cfu) of Staphylococcus aureus Xen36. Control mice (n = 20) did not receive antibiotics. Treated mice received either 24 h (n = 35) or 4 days (n = 34) of cefazolin prophylaxis. Cultures were obtained from the prostheses, tibia, femur, and knee tissues 3 weeks after surgery. All mice in the control group developed PJI. Both prophylaxis regimens reduced the rate of PJI relative to the control, with only 2/35 mice in the 24-h cohort (p < 0.0001) and 1/34 in 4-day cohort developing PJI (p < 0.0001). CFU counts from the prostheses, bone and knee tissues were reduced for the 24-h and 4-day prophylaxis cohorts relative to the control (p < 0.0001 for both). There was no difference in rates of PJI or CFU counts between the two prophylaxis cohorts (p = 0.58). Prophylactic cefazolin profoundly reduced rates of PJI in a murine model of TJA in which all control animals developed PJI. Extending cefazolin prophylaxis duration from 24 h to 4 days did not result in improved PJI rates or decreased bacterial loads in infected cases. While these results strongly support use of antibiotic prophylaxis for TJA, EAP did not appear to add benefit in the described mouse model.

摘要

为了最大限度地降低人工关节假体周围感染(PJI)的风险,一些临床医生在全膝关节置换术后(TJA)会开具延长抗生素预防用药(EAP)。鉴于支持 EAP 的证据有限,我们试图在 TJA 小鼠模型中评估预防性抗生素持续时间对 PJI 风险的影响。将钛假体植入 89 只小鼠的胫骨近端,并接种 10 个金黄色葡萄球菌 Xen36 的集落形成单位(cfu)。对照组(n=20)的小鼠未接受抗生素治疗。治疗组的小鼠分别接受 24 小时(n=35)或 4 天(n=34)头孢唑啉预防用药。术后 3 周从假体、胫骨、股骨和膝关节组织中获取培养物。对照组的所有小鼠均发生 PJI。两种预防方案均降低了 PJI 的发生率,与对照组相比,24 小时组只有 2/35 只小鼠(p<0.0001)和 4 天组 1/34 只小鼠(p<0.0001)发生 PJI。与对照组相比,24 小时和 4 天预防组的假体、骨和膝关节组织的 CFU 计数均降低(p<0.0001,两者均)。两种预防方案的 PJI 发生率或 CFU 计数均无差异(p=0.58)。头孢唑啉预防性治疗在 TJA 小鼠模型中显著降低了 PJI 的发生率,所有对照组动物均发生 PJI。将头孢唑啉预防用药持续时间从 24 小时延长至 4 天,并未改善 PJI 发生率或降低感染病例的细菌负荷。虽然这些结果强烈支持 TJA 使用抗生素预防用药,但在描述的小鼠模型中,EAP 似乎没有带来额外的益处。

相似文献

1
Duration of cefazolin prophylaxis did not impact infection risk in a murine model of joint arthroplasty.头孢唑林预防用药时间长短对关节置换术后小鼠模型的感染风险没有影响。
J Orthop Res. 2024 Oct;42(10):2345-2352. doi: 10.1002/jor.25903. Epub 2024 May 26.
2
Extended Prophylactic Antibiotics for Primary and Aseptic Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis.延长预防性抗生素用于初次和无菌性翻修全关节置换术:一项荟萃分析。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Sep;39(9S2):S476-S487. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.01.014. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
3
Regional Intraosseous Administration of Prophylactic Antibiotics is More Effective Than Systemic Administration in a Mouse Model of TKA.在全膝关节置换术小鼠模型中,预防性抗生素的区域骨内给药比全身给药更有效。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Nov;473(11):3573-84. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4464-x. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
4
2019 John Charnley Award: Increased risk of prosthetic joint infection following primary total knee and hip arthroplasty with the use of alternative antibiotics to cefazolin: the value of allergy testing for antibiotic prophylaxis.2019 年约翰·查恩利奖:与使用头孢唑啉以外的抗生素相比,初次全膝关节和髋关节置换术后假体关节感染风险增加:抗生素预防过敏测试的价值。
Bone Joint J. 2019 Jun;101-B(6_Supple_B):9-15. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B6.BJJ-2018-1407.R1.
5
Non-cefazolin antibiotic prophylaxis is associated with higher rates of elbow periprosthetic joint infection.非头孢唑林抗生素预防与肘关节假体周围感染的较高发生率相关。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Apr;33(4):940-947. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.10.029. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
6
Vancomycin Prophylaxis for Total Joint Arthroplasty: Incorrectly Dosed and Has a Higher Rate of Periprosthetic Infection Than Cefazolin.全关节置换术的万古霉素预防:剂量错误且假体周围感染率高于头孢唑林。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Jul;475(7):1767-1774. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5302-0.
7
Extended Oral Antibiotic Prophylaxis in High-Risk Patients Substantially Reduces Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty 90-Day Infection Rate.高风险患者延长口服抗生素预防可显著降低初次全髋关节和膝关节置换术 90 天感染率。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Dec 19;100(24):2103-2109. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01485.
8
Dual-Agent Antibiotic Prophylaxis Using a Single Preoperative Vancomycin Dose Effectively Reduces Prosthetic Joint Infection Rates With Minimal Renal Toxicity Risk.使用单次术前万古霉素剂量进行双药联合抗生素预防可有效降低人工关节感染率,且肾毒性风险最小。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jul;33(7S):S213-S218. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.03.009. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
9
Cefazolin Prophylaxis for Total Joint Arthroplasty: Obese Patients Are Frequently Underdosed and at Increased Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection.头孢唑林预防全关节置换术:肥胖患者经常剂量不足,且有增加假体周围关节感染的风险。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Nov;33(11):3551-3554. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.06.037. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
10
Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Single Dose Is as Effective as Multiple Doses.关节置换围手术期抗生素预防:单剂量与多剂量同样有效。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Mar 6;101(5):429-437. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00336.