• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全关节置换术的万古霉素预防:剂量错误且假体周围感染率高于头孢唑林。

Vancomycin Prophylaxis for Total Joint Arthroplasty: Incorrectly Dosed and Has a Higher Rate of Periprosthetic Infection Than Cefazolin.

作者信息

Kheir Michael M, Tan Timothy L, Azboy Ibrahim, Tan Dean D, Parvizi Javad

机构信息

The Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, 125 S 9th Street, Suite 1000, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Jul;475(7):1767-1774. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5302-0.

DOI:10.1007/s11999-017-5302-0
PMID:28401341
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5449331/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In total joint arthroplasty (TJA), vancomycin is used as perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with penicillin allergy or in patients colonized with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Although vancomycin dosing should be weight-based (15 mg/kg), not all surgeons are aware of this; a fixed 1-g dose is instead frequently administered.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Is there a difference in the risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients receiving vancomycin or cefazolin prophylaxis after primary TJA? (2) What proportion of patients is adequately dosed with vancomycin? (3) Compared with actual fixed dosing, does weight-based dosing result in a greater proportion of patients staying above the recommended 15-mg/L level at the beginning and end of surgery? (4) Are patients overdosed with vancomycin at greater risk of developing nephrotoxicity and acute kidney injury?

METHODS

A single-institution, retrospective study was performed on 1828 patients undergoing primary TJAs who received vancomycin prophylaxis between 2008 and 2014. During the same period, 5810 patients underwent primary TJA and received cefazolin monotherapy. A chart review was performed to obtain patient characteristics, antibiotic dose and timing of administration, and microbiology data. Adequate vancomycin dosing was defined as 15 mg/kg and within the 125-mg range. Vancomycin levels were calculated at the beginning and end of surgery using pharmacokinetic equations. Levels of 15 mg/L were considered adequate. Logistic regression, chi square tests, and analysis of variance were performed.

RESULTS

Among primary TJAs, patients receiving vancomycin had a higher rate of PJI (32 of 1828 [2%]) compared with patients receiving cefazolin prophylaxis (62 of 5810 [1%]; adjusted odds ratio, 1.587 [1.004-2.508]; p = 0.048). Ten percent of PJIs in the vancomycin underdosed group (two of 20) was caused by MRSA, and no patients with adequate dosing or overdosing of vancomycin developed PJI with MRSA. Of all procedures in which vancomycin monotherapy was used, 28% (518 of 1828) was adequately dosed according to weight-based dosage recommendations. Furthermore, 94% (1726 of 1828) of patients received a fixed 1-g dose of vancomycin, of whom 64% (1105 of 1726) were underdosed. All patients had vancomycin infusion initiated within 2 hours before incision. A weight-based protocol would have resulted in fewer patients having unacceptably low vancomycin levels (< 15 mg/L) compared with those with actual fixed dosing, both for the beginning of surgery at the time of incision (zero of 1828 [0%] versus 471 of 1828 [26%]; odds ratio, 0.001 [0.000-0.013]; p < 0.001) and at the end of surgery (33 of 1828 [2%] versus 746 of 1828 [41%]; odds ratio, 0.027 [0.019-0.038]; p < 0.001). Between the vancomycin dosage groups, there were no differences in the rate of nephrotoxicity (underdosed: 12 of 1130 [1%], adequately dosed: five of 518 [1%], overdosed: four of 180 [2%], p = 0.363) and acute kidney injury (underdosed: 28 of 1130 [2%], adequately dosed: 10 of 518 [2%], overdosed: six of 180 [3%], p = 0.561).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients given vancomycin prophylaxis are underdosed according to the weight-based dosage recommendations, and MRSA did not occur in patients who were adequately dosed with vancomycin. Surgeons should thus ensure that their patients are adequately dosed with vancomycin using the recommendation of 15 mg/kg and that the dose of vancomycin is administered in a timely fashion. Furthermore, and based on the findings of this study, we have moved toward limiting the utilization of vancomycin prophylaxis for patients undergoing elective arthroplasty at our institution.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

摘要

背景

在全关节置换术(TJA)中,对于青霉素过敏患者或耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)定植患者,万古霉素用作围手术期抗生素预防用药。尽管万古霉素给药应基于体重(15mg/kg),但并非所有外科医生都知晓这一点;相反,经常给予固定的1g剂量。

问题/目的:(1)初次全关节置换术后接受万古霉素或头孢唑林预防的患者,假体周围关节感染(PJI)风险是否存在差异?(2)万古霉素给药剂量合适的患者比例是多少?(3)与实际固定剂量相比,基于体重的给药方案是否会使更多患者在手术开始和结束时保持在推荐的15mg/L水平以上?(4)万古霉素用药过量的患者发生肾毒性和急性肾损伤的风险是否更高?

方法

对2008年至2014年间接受万古霉素预防的1828例初次全关节置换术患者进行了单机构回顾性研究。同期,5810例患者接受了初次全关节置换术并接受头孢唑林单药治疗。通过查阅病历获取患者特征、抗生素剂量和给药时间以及微生物学数据。万古霉素给药剂量合适定义为15mg/kg且在125mg范围内。使用药代动力学方程计算手术开始和结束时的万古霉素水平。15mg/L的水平被认为是合适的。进行了逻辑回归、卡方检验和方差分析。

结果

在初次全关节置换术中,接受万古霉素的患者发生PJI的比例(1828例中的32例[2%])高于接受头孢唑林预防的患者(5810例中的62例[1%];调整后的优势比,1.587[1.004 - 2.508];p = 0.048)。万古霉素剂量不足组中10%的PJI(20例中的2例)由MRSA引起,万古霉素剂量合适或过量的患者均未发生由MRSA引起的PJI。在所有使用万古霉素单药治疗的手术中,根据基于体重的剂量建议,28%(1828例中的518例)给药剂量合适。此外,94%(1828例中的1726例)患者接受了1g固定剂量的万古霉素,其中64%(1726例中的1105例)剂量不足。所有患者均在切口前2小时内开始输注万古霉素。与实际固定剂量相比,基于体重的方案在手术开始时(切口时1828例中的0例[0%]对1828例中的471例[26%];优势比,0.001[0.000 - 0.013];p < 0.001)和手术结束时(1828例中的33例[2%]对1828例中的746例[41%];优势比,0.027[0.019 - 0.038];p < 0.001)会使万古霉素水平过低(< 15mg/L)的患者更少。在万古霉素剂量组之间,肾毒性发生率(剂量不足:1130例中的12例[1%],剂量合适:518例中的5例[1%],过量:180例中的4例[2%],p = 0.363)和急性肾损伤发生率(剂量不足:1130例中的28例[2%],剂量合适:518例中的10例[2%],过量:180例中的6例[3%],p = 0.561)无差异。

结论

大多数接受万古霉素预防的患者根据基于体重的剂量建议剂量不足,万古霉素剂量合适的患者未发生MRSA感染。因此,外科医生应确保按照15mg/kg的建议为患者给予合适剂量的万古霉素,并及时给药。此外,基于本研究结果,我们已在本机构限制对接受择期关节置换术患者使用万古霉素预防。

证据水平

III级,治疗性研究。

相似文献

1
Vancomycin Prophylaxis for Total Joint Arthroplasty: Incorrectly Dosed and Has a Higher Rate of Periprosthetic Infection Than Cefazolin.全关节置换术的万古霉素预防:剂量错误且假体周围感染率高于头孢唑林。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Jul;475(7):1767-1774. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5302-0.
2
Cefazolin Prophylaxis for Total Joint Arthroplasty: Obese Patients Are Frequently Underdosed and at Increased Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection.头孢唑林预防全关节置换术:肥胖患者经常剂量不足,且有增加假体周围关节感染的风险。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Nov;33(11):3551-3554. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.06.037. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
3
Is Vancomycin-only Prophylaxis for Patients With Penicillin Allergy Associated With Increased Risk of Infection After Arthroplasty?仅使用万古霉素对青霉素过敏患者进行关节置换术后感染预防是否会增加感染风险?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jul;474(7):1601-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4672-4.
4
Dual-Agent Antibiotic Prophylaxis Using a Single Preoperative Vancomycin Dose Effectively Reduces Prosthetic Joint Infection Rates With Minimal Renal Toxicity Risk.使用单次术前万古霉素剂量进行双药联合抗生素预防可有效降低人工关节感染率,且肾毒性风险最小。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jul;33(7S):S213-S218. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.03.009. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
5
Addition of Vancomycin to Cefazolin Prophylaxis Is Associated With Acute Kidney Injury After Primary Joint Arthroplasty.在头孢唑林预防用药基础上加用万古霉素与初次关节置换术后急性肾损伤相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jul;473(7):2197-203. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4062-3.
6
The standard one gram dose of vancomycin is not adequate prophylaxis for MRSA.万古霉素标准的1克剂量对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的预防并不充分。
Iowa Orthop J. 2014;34:111-7.
7
Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Single Dose Is as Effective as Multiple Doses.关节置换围手术期抗生素预防:单剂量与多剂量同样有效。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Mar 6;101(5):429-437. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00336.
8
Effect of Body Weight on Cefazolin and Vancomycin Trabecular Bone Concentrations in Patients Undergoing Total Joint Arthroplasty.体重对全关节置换术患者头孢唑林和万古霉素小梁骨浓度的影响。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2016 Feb;17(1):71-7. doi: 10.1089/sur.2015.067. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
9
Regional Intraosseous Administration of Prophylactic Antibiotics is More Effective Than Systemic Administration in a Mouse Model of TKA.在全膝关节置换术小鼠模型中,预防性抗生素的区域骨内给药比全身给药更有效。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Nov;473(11):3573-84. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4464-x. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
10
Targeted use of vancomycin as perioperative prophylaxis reduces periprosthetic joint infection in revision TKA.万古霉素的靶向使用作为围手术期预防可降低翻修 TKA 中的假体周围关节感染。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jan;472(1):227-31. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3029-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Vancomycin Antibiotic Prophylaxis Compared to Cefazolin Increases Risk of Surgical Site Infection Following Spine Surgery.与头孢唑林相比,万古霉素预防性抗生素治疗会增加脊柱手术后手术部位感染的风险。
Global Spine J. 2025 May 7:21925682251341833. doi: 10.1177/21925682251341833.
2
Bacteriophage Dosing and Its Effect on Bacterial Growth Suppression in a Model: An Study.噬菌体给药及其在模型中对细菌生长抑制的影响:一项研究。
Phage (New Rochelle). 2024 Dec 18;5(4):223-229. doi: 10.1089/phage.2024.0001. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Increased rates of periprosthetic joint infection following hip hemiarthroplasty with clindamycin prophylaxis compared to cefazolin.与头孢唑林相比,髋关节半关节置换术中使用克林霉素预防感染后假体周围关节感染率增加。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Feb 15;145(1):164. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-05780-5.
4
Improving cefazolin administration for surgical prophylaxis in reported penicillin allergy: A retrospective study of a health system intervention.改善报告有青霉素过敏史患者手术预防用头孢唑林的给药情况:一项卫生系统干预的回顾性研究
J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob. 2024 Nov 26;4(1):100377. doi: 10.1016/j.jacig.2024.100377. eCollection 2025 Feb.
5
Pre-Operative Management of the Penicillin Allergic Patient: A Narrative Review.青霉素过敏患者的术前管理:一项叙述性综述
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2024 Oct 8;16:124336. doi: 10.52965/001c.124336. eCollection 2024.
6
Vancomycin Is Not an Effective Prophylactic Agent Alone and Should Be Combined With Another Agent: Did You Know Series.万古霉素单独作为预防性药物无效,应与另一种药物联合使用:“你知道吗”系列。
Arthroplast Today. 2024 Nov 14;30:101578. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101578. eCollection 2024 Dec.
7
Hidden costs of first choice alternatives: A financial model of thromboprophylaxis and prosthetic joint infection prophylaxis in total knee arthroplasty.首选方案的隐性成本:全膝关节置换术中血栓预防和人工关节感染预防的财务模型
J Orthop. 2024 Nov 1;63:87-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.10.053. eCollection 2025 May.
8
Intraosseous regional antibiotic prophylaxis in total joint arthroplasty (TJA): Systematic review and meta-analysis.全关节置换术中骨内局部抗生素预防:系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2024 Oct 3;57:102553. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102553. eCollection 2024 Oct.
9
Preventing Infections in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.预防反肩关节置换术中的感染
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2024 Nov;17(11):456-464. doi: 10.1007/s12178-024-09918-7. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
10
The effect of different preventive strategies during total joint arthroplasty on periprosthetic joint infection: a network meta-analysis.不同全关节置换术围手术期预防策略对假体周围关节感染的影响:网状 Meta 分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Jun 18;19(1):360. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04738-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Surgical site infection and transfusion rates are higher in underweight total knee arthroplasty patients.体重过轻的全膝关节置换术患者手术部位感染率和输血率较高。
Arthroplast Today. 2016 May 19;3(1):57-60. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2016.03.005. eCollection 2017 Mar.
2
Weight-based dosing in medication use: what should we know?药物使用中的基于体重的给药:我们应该了解什么?
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016 Apr 12;10:549-60. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S103156. eCollection 2016.
3
Comparing In-Hospital Total Joint Arthroplasty Outcomes and Resource Consumption Among Underweight and Morbidly Obese Patients.比较体重过轻和病态肥胖患者的院内全关节置换术结果及资源消耗情况。
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Oct;31(10):2085-90. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.03.015. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
4
Is Vancomycin-only Prophylaxis for Patients With Penicillin Allergy Associated With Increased Risk of Infection After Arthroplasty?仅使用万古霉素对青霉素过敏患者进行关节置换术后感染预防是否会增加感染风险?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jul;474(7):1601-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4672-4.
5
Prevention of Periprosthetic Joint Infection.人工关节周围感染的预防
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2015 Apr;3(2):72-81.
6
The standard one gram dose of vancomycin is not adequate prophylaxis for MRSA.万古霉素标准的1克剂量对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的预防并不充分。
Iowa Orthop J. 2014;34:111-7.
7
Surgical Site Infection After Arthroplasty: Comparative Effectiveness of Prophylactic Antibiotics: Do Surgical Care Improvement Project Guidelines Need to Be Updated?关节置换术后的手术部位感染:预防性抗生素的比较效果:外科手术质量改进项目指南是否需要更新?
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Jun 18;96(12):970-977. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00663.
8
Prevention of periprosthetic joint infection: what are the effective strategies?人工关节周围感染的预防:有效的策略有哪些?
J Knee Surg. 2014 Aug;27(4):251-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1376332. Epub 2014 May 3.
9
Prevention of surgical site infection: beyond SCIP.手术部位感染的预防:超越外科护理改进项目
AORN J. 2014 Feb;99(2):315-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aorn.2013.11.007.
10
Perioperative antibiotics.围手术期抗生素
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Feb;29(2 Suppl):29-48. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.09.030. Epub 2013 Dec 16.