Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, South Korea.
Respir Med. 2024 Aug-Sep;230:107679. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2024.107679. Epub 2024 May 24.
The Lancet Commissions on COPD recommended a new classification based on five main risk factors. Patients with COPD were prospectively enrolled in a Korean COPD subgroup study cohort between April 2012 and June 2022. Patients were classified according to the etiologies (Type 1: Genetically determined (COPD-G), Type 2: Abnormal lung development (COPD-D), Type 3: Infections (COPD-I), Type 4: Cigarette smoking (COPD-C), Type 5: Biomass and pollution (COPD-P)). The database enrolled 3476 patients. Among 3392 patients, 52 (2 %), 1339 (39 %), 2930 (86 %), and 2221 (65 %) were compatible with type 2 (COPD-D), 3 (COPD-I), 4 (COPD-C), and 5 (COPD-P), respectively. Most patients (71 %, 2405) had multiple risk factors contributing to their COPD. However, 93, 712, and 182 patients had only type 3 (COPD-I), 4 (COPD-C), and 5 (COPD-P), respectively. Type 3 (COPD-I) only patients were significantly younger, more often female, and had lower lung function. Both the rate and frequency of severe exacerbations were significantly higher in type 3 (COPD-I) only patients (p = 0.038 and p = 0.048, respectively). Compared with type 5 (COPD-P) only, type 3 (COPD-I) only was significantly associated with the risk of severe exacerbation (Odds ratio, 5.7 [95 % CI, 1.0-32.4]; P = 0.049, incident rate ratio, 8.7 [95 % CI, 1.7-44.0]; P = 0.009). Many patients were affected by multiple factors. Therefore, it is important to consider not only smoking history, but also other potential risk factors when evaluating patients with COPD. Further research is needed to explore the implications of this new COPD classification system for clinical practice and treatment strategies.
柳叶刀委员会建议基于五个主要风险因素制定新的分类。2012 年 4 月至 2022 年 6 月期间,在韩国 COPD 亚组研究队列中前瞻性招募 COPD 患者。根据病因将患者分为以下类型:1 型:遗传决定(COPD-G);2 型:肺发育异常(COPD-D);3 型:感染(COPD-I);4 型:吸烟(COPD-C);5 型:生物量和污染(COPD-P)。该数据库共纳入 3476 例患者。在 3392 例患者中,52 例(2%)、1339 例(39%)、2930 例(86%)和 2221 例(65%)分别与 2 型(COPD-D)、3 型(COPD-I)、4 型(COPD-C)和 5 型(COPD-P)相符。大多数患者(71%,2405 例)有多种导致 COPD 的危险因素。然而,93 例、712 例和 182 例患者仅患有 3 型(COPD-I)、4 型(COPD-C)和 5 型(COPD-P)。仅 3 型(COPD-I)患者明显更年轻,女性更多,肺功能更低。仅 3 型(COPD-I)患者的严重恶化发生率和频率均显著更高(p=0.038 和 p=0.048)。与仅 5 型(COPD-P)相比,仅 3 型(COPD-I)与严重恶化的风险显著相关(比值比,5.7[95%CI,1.0-32.4];P=0.049,发生率比,8.7[95%CI,1.7-44.0];P=0.009)。许多患者受到多种因素的影响。因此,在评估 COPD 患者时,不仅要考虑吸烟史,还要考虑其他潜在的危险因素。需要进一步研究来探讨这一新的 COPD 分类系统对临床实践和治疗策略的影响。