Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; Center for Global Non-Communicable Disease Research and Training, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA.
Center for Global Non-Communicable Disease Research and Training, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Environ Res. 2024 Sep 15;257:119220. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.119220. Epub 2024 May 24.
Brick kiln emissions adversely affect air pollution and the health of workers and individuals living near the kilns; however, evidence of their impacts remains limited. We conducted a systematic review of brick kiln pollution (emissions, source contributions and personal exposures) and its effects on health. We extracted articles from electronic databases and through manual citation searching. We estimated pooled, sample-size-weighted means and standard deviations for personal exposures by job type; computed mean emission factors and pollutant concentrations by brick kiln design; and meta-analyzed differences in means or proportions for health outcomes between brick kiln workers and controls or for participants living near or far away from kilns. We identified 104 studies; 74 were conducted in South Asia. The most evaluated pollutants were particulate matter (PM; n = 48), sulfur dioxide (SO; n = 24) and carbon monoxide (CO; n = 22), and the most evaluated health outcomes were respiratory health (n = 34) and musculoskeletal disorders (n = 9). PM and CO emissions were higher among traditional than improved brick kilns. Mean respirable silica exposures were only measured in 4 (4%) studies and were as high as 620 μg/m, exceeding the NIOSH recommended exposure limit by a factor of over 12. Brick kiln workers had consistently worse lung function, more respiratory symptoms, more musculoskeletal complaints, and more inflammation when compared to unexposed participants across studies; however, most studies had a small sample size and did not fully describe methods used for sampling or data collection. On average, brick kiln workers had worse health outcomes when compared to unexposed controls but study quality supporting the evidence was low. Few studies reported silica concentrations or personal exposures, but the few that did suggest that exposures are high. Further research is needed to better understand the relationship between brick kiln pollution and health among workers, and to evaluate exposure mitigation strategies.
砖窑排放物对空气污染和窑炉附近工人和居民的健康产生不利影响,但相关证据仍然有限。我们对砖窑污染(排放、来源贡献和个人暴露)及其对健康的影响进行了系统评价。我们从电子数据库和手动引文搜索中提取了文章。我们按工种提取个人暴露的汇总、样本量加权均值和标准差;根据砖窑设计计算平均排放因子和污染物浓度;并对砖窑工人和对照组、居住在窑炉附近或远处的参与者之间的健康结果进行均值或比例的荟萃分析。我们共确定了 104 项研究;其中 74 项在南亚进行。评价最多的污染物是颗粒物(PM;n=48)、二氧化硫(SO;n=24)和一氧化碳(CO;n=22),评价最多的健康结果是呼吸道健康(n=34)和肌肉骨骼疾病(n=9)。传统砖窑的 PM 和 CO 排放高于改良砖窑。仅有 4 项(4%)研究测量了可吸入二氧化硅暴露量,最高值达到 620μg/m,超过 NIOSH 推荐暴露限值 12 倍以上。与未暴露的参与者相比,砖窑工人的肺功能更差,呼吸道症状更多,肌肉骨骼投诉更多,炎症更多;但大多数研究的样本量较小,未充分描述采样或数据收集所使用的方法。与未暴露的对照组相比,砖窑工人的健康结果平均较差,但支持证据的研究质量较低。很少有研究报告二氧化硅浓度或个人暴露量,但为数不多的研究表明暴露量较高。需要进一步研究以更好地了解砖窑污染与工人健康之间的关系,并评估暴露缓解策略。