Oncology Department I, Longhua Hospital Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Oncology Department, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Chin J Integr Med. 2024 Jun;30(6):489-498. doi: 10.1007/s11655-024-4107-8. Epub 2024 May 27.
To describe the treatment patterns and survival status of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) in China in the past two decades, and objectively evaluate the impact of standardized Chinese medicine (CM) treatment on the survival of AGC patients.
This multicenter registry designed and propensity score analysis study described the diagnosis characteristics, treatment-pattern development and survival status of AGC from 10 hospitals in China between January 1, 2000 and July 31, 2021. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated between non-CM cohort (standard medical treatment) and CM cohort (integrated standard CM treatment ≥3 months). Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were performed to adjust any difference in average outcomes for bias.
A total of 2,001 patients histologically confirmed locally advanced and/or metastasis stomach and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma were enrolled. Among them, 1,607 received systemic chemotherapy, 215 (10.74%) accepted molecular targeted therapy, 44 (2.2%) received checkpoint inhibitor therapy, and 769 (38.43%) received CM. Two-drug regimen was the main choice for first-line treatment, with fluoropyrimidine plus platinum as the most common regimen (530 cases, 60.09%). While 45.71% (16 cases) of patients with HER2 amplification received trastuzumab in first-line. The application of apatinib increased (33.33%) in third-line. The application of checkpoint inhibitors has increased since 2020. COX analysis showed that Lauren mixed type (P=0.017), cycles of first-line treatment >6 (P=0.000), CM (P=0.000), palliative gastrectomy (P=0.000), trastuzumab (P=0.011), and apatinib (P=0.008) were independent prognostic factors for the OS of AGC. After PSM and IPTW, the median OS of CM cohort and non-CM cohort was 18.17 and 12.45 months, respectively (P<0.001).
In real-world practice for AGC in China, therapy choices consisted with guidelines. Two-drug regimen was the main first-line choice. Standardized CM treatment was an independent prognostic factor and could prolong the OS of Chinese patients with AGC. (Registration No. NCT02781285).
描述过去 20 年中国晚期胃癌(AGC)的治疗模式和生存状况,并客观评估规范化中医药(CM)治疗对 AGC 患者生存的影响。
本多中心登记研究和倾向评分分析研究描述了 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 7 月 31 日期间中国 10 家医院 AGC 的诊断特征、治疗模式发展和生存状况。总生存期(OS)在非 CM 队列(标准医疗治疗)和 CM 队列(接受≥3 个月的综合标准 CM 治疗)之间进行评估。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)和逆概率处理加权(IPTW)调整平均结果的任何差异以消除偏倚。
共纳入 2001 例经组织学证实的局部晚期和/或转移胃和胃食管交界处腺癌患者。其中,1607 例接受了全身化疗,215 例(10.74%)接受了分子靶向治疗,44 例(2.2%)接受了检查点抑制剂治疗,769 例(38.43%)接受了 CM 治疗。二药联合方案是一线治疗的主要选择,氟嘧啶加铂类是最常见的方案(530 例,60.09%)。而 HER2 扩增的 45.71%(16 例)患者在一线治疗中接受了曲妥珠单抗。三线治疗中阿帕替尼的应用增加(33.33%)。自 2020 年以来,检查点抑制剂的应用有所增加。COX 分析显示,Lauren 混合型(P=0.017)、一线治疗周期>6(P=0.000)、CM(P=0.000)、姑息性胃切除术(P=0.000)、曲妥珠单抗(P=0.011)和阿帕替尼(P=0.008)是 AGC OS 的独立预后因素。PSM 和 IPTW 后,CM 队列和非 CM 队列的中位 OS 分别为 18.17 个月和 12.45 个月(P<0.001)。
在中国的 AGC 实际治疗中,治疗选择符合指南。二药联合方案是一线治疗的主要选择。规范化 CM 治疗是独立的预后因素,可以延长中国 AGC 患者的 OS。(注册号:NCT02781285)。