Suppr超能文献

体外冲击波疗法和低强度激光疗法对足底筋膜炎患者的疗效。

Efficacies of extracorporeal shockwave therapy and low-level laser therapy in patients with plantar fasciitis.

作者信息

Koz Gökhan, Kamanli Ayhan, Kaban Nedim, Harman Halil

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey.

Division of Rheumatology, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey.

出版信息

Foot Ankle Surg. 2023 Apr;29(3):223-227. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2023.01.009. Epub 2023 Jan 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Various conservative treatment methods can be administered in the early stages of plantar fasciitis (PF). The aim of the treatment is to enable the patient to return to the physical activity as soon as possible.

AIM

In this study it was aimed to compare efficacies of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (ESWT) and Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) on patients with PF.

DESIGN

A local prospective cross-sectional study SETTING: Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Outpatient Clinic of Sakarya University, Faculty of Medicine POPULATION: Patients aged 18-70 years, having ongoing heel pain for at least 3 months, and not using oral and/or parenteral corticosteroids in the last 6 months.

METHODS

A total of 40 patients with PF included in the current study. Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Roles and Maudsley Score (RMS), American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Association Score (AOFAS) and Foot Function Index (FFI) questionnaire were performed for all patients. ESWT and LLLT groups comprised of 22 (55%) and 18 (45%) patients, respectively.

RESULTS

We found significant improvements in scores based on the VAS, RMS, AOFAS, FFI in patients with PF and it was sustained for 3 months (p = 0.001, for all scores). While decrease in scores based on the VAS and FFI in LLLT group was statistically more significant compared to ESWT group (p = 0.014, p = 0.013), there was statistically less significant decrease in scores on the AOFAS in LLLT group than that of ESWT group (p = 0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicated significant improvements in terms of pain, functional status and daily life activities following the administration of either of the treatments. Furthermore, LLLT was found to be significantly more effective for alleviating pain than ESWT in the treatment of PF.

摘要

背景

足底筋膜炎(PF)早期可采用多种保守治疗方法。治疗目的是使患者尽快恢复体育活动。

目的

本研究旨在比较体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)和低强度激光疗法(LLLT)对PF患者的疗效。

设计

局部前瞻性横断面研究

地点

萨卡里亚大学医学院物理医学与康复门诊

研究对象

年龄在18 - 70岁之间,足跟疼痛持续至少3个月,且在过去6个月内未使用口服和/或胃肠外皮质类固醇的患者。

方法

本研究共纳入40例PF患者。对所有患者进行视觉模拟量表(VAS)、罗尔斯和莫兹利评分(RMS)、美国矫形足踝协会评分(AOFAS)以及足部功能指数(FFI)问卷评估。ESWT组和LLLT组分别由22例(55%)和18例(45%)患者组成。

结果

我们发现PF患者的VAS、RMS、AOFAS、FFI评分有显著改善,且持续3个月(所有评分p = 0.001)。与ESWT组相比,LLLT组基于VAS和FFI的评分下降在统计学上更显著(p = 0.014,p = 0.013),而LLLT组AOFAS评分下降在统计学上比ESWT组不显著(p = 0.032)。

结论

本研究结果表明,两种治疗方法在疼痛、功能状态和日常生活活动方面均有显著改善。此外,在PF治疗中,LLLT在减轻疼痛方面比ESWT显著更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验