文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

基于 SEER 数据库的乳腺癌不同淋巴结状态的新型列线图和生存分析。

A novel nomogram and survival analysis for different lymph node status in breast cancer based on the SEER database.

机构信息

Department of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150001, China.

Key Laboratory of Acoustic, Optical and Electromagnetic Diagnosis and Treatment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.

出版信息

Breast Cancer. 2024 Sep;31(5):769-786. doi: 10.1007/s12282-024-01591-5. Epub 2024 May 27.


DOI:10.1007/s12282-024-01591-5
PMID:38802681
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11341746/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The axillary lymph node status (ALNS) and internal mammary lymph nodes (IMLN) expression associated with breast cancer are closely linked to prognosis. This study aimed to establish a nomogram to predict survival at 3, 5, and 10 years in patients with various lymph node statuses. METHODS: We obtained data from patients with breast cancer between 2004 and 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER database). Chi-square analysis was performed to test for differences in the pathological characteristics of the groups, and Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used to plot and compare the correlation between overall survival (OS) and breast cancer specific survival (BCSS). The log-rank test was used for the univariate analysis, and statistically significant characteristics were included in the multivariate and Cox regression analyses. Finally, Independent factor identification was included in constructing the nomogram using R studio 4.2.0; area under curve (AUC) values were calculated, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration, and decision curve analysis (DCA) curves were plotted for evaluation. RESULTS: A total of 279,078 patients were enrolled and analysed, demonstrating that the isolated tumour cells (ITC) group had clinicopathological characteristics similar to those of micrometastases (Mic). Multivariate analysis was performed to identify each subgroup's independent risk factors and construct a nomogram. The AUC values were 74.7 (95% CI 73.6-75.8), 72.8 (95% CI 71.9-73.8), and 71.2 (95% CI 70.2-72.2) for 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS, respectively, and 82.2 (95% CI 80.9-83.6), 80.1 (95% CI 79.0-81.2), and 75.5 (95% CI 74.3-76.8) for BCSS in overall breast cancer cases, respectively. AUC values for 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS in the ITC group were 64.8 (95% CI 56.5-73.2), 67.7 (95% CI 62.0-73.4), and 65.4 (95% CI 60.0-70.7), respectively. For those in the Mic group, AUC values for 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS were 72.9 (95% CI 70.7-75.1), 72.4 (95% CI 70.6-74.1), and 71.3 (95% CI 69.6-73.1), respectively, and AUC values for BCSS were 77.8 (95% CI 74.9-80.7), 75.7 (95% CI 73.5-77.9), and 70.3 (95% CI 68.0-72.6), respectively. In the IMLN group, AUC values for 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS were 75.2 (95% CI 71.7-78.7), 73.4 (95% CI 70.0-76.8), and 74.0 (95% CI 69.6-78.5), respectively, and AUC values for BCSS were 76.6 (95% CI 73.0-80.3), 74.1 (95% CI 70.5-77.7), and 74.7 (95% CI 69.8-79.5), respectively. The ROC, calibration, and DCA curves verified that the nomogram had better predictability and benefits. CONCLUSION: This study is the first to investigate the predictive value of different axillary lymph node statuses and internal mammary lymph node metastases in breast cancer, providing clinicians with additional aid in treatment decisions.

摘要

简介:乳腺癌的腋窝淋巴结状态(ALNS)和内乳淋巴结(IMLN)表达与预后密切相关。本研究旨在建立一个列线图,以预测不同淋巴结状态患者的 3、5 和 10 年生存率。

方法:我们从 2004 年至 2015 年的 SEER 数据库中获取了乳腺癌患者的数据。使用卡方分析检验组间病理特征的差异,使用 Kaplan-Meier 分析和对数秩检验绘制和比较总生存(OS)和乳腺癌特异性生存(BCSS)之间的相关性。对数秩检验用于单因素分析,有统计学意义的特征被纳入多因素和 Cox 回归分析。最后,使用 R studio 4.2.0 中的独立因素识别来构建列线图;计算曲线下面积(AUC)值,并绘制接受者操作特征(ROC)曲线、校准曲线和决策曲线分析(DCA)曲线进行评估。

结果:共纳入 279078 例患者进行分析,结果表明孤立肿瘤细胞(ITC)组的临床病理特征与微转移(Mic)组相似。通过多因素分析确定了每个亚组的独立危险因素,并构建了列线图。3 年、5 年和 10 年 OS 的 AUC 值分别为 74.7(95%CI 73.6-75.8)、72.8(95%CI 71.9-73.8)和 71.2(95%CI 70.2-72.2),总体乳腺癌患者的 82.2(95%CI 80.9-83.6)、80.1(95%CI 79.0-81.2)和 75.5(95%CI 74.3-76.8),以及 ITC 组 3 年、5 年和 10 年 OS 的 AUC 值分别为 64.8(95%CI 56.5-73.2)、67.7(95%CI 62.0-73.4)和 65.4(95%CI 60.0-70.7),Mic 组 3 年、5 年和 10 年 OS 的 AUC 值分别为 72.9(95%CI 70.7-75.1)、72.4(95%CI 70.6-74.1)和 71.3(95%CI 69.6-73.1),BCSS 的 AUC 值分别为 77.8(95%CI 74.9-80.7)、75.7(95%CI 73.5-77.9)和 70.3(95%CI 68.0-72.6),IMLN 组 3 年、5 年和 10 年 OS 的 AUC 值分别为 75.2(95%CI 71.7-78.7)、73.4(95%CI 70.0-76.8)和 74.0(95%CI 69.6-78.5),BCSS 的 AUC 值分别为 76.6(95%CI 73.0-80.3)、74.1(95%CI 70.5-77.7)和 74.7(95%CI 69.8-79.5)。ROC、校准和 DCA 曲线验证了该列线图具有更好的预测能力和获益。

结论:本研究首次探讨了不同腋窝淋巴结状态和内乳淋巴结转移对乳腺癌的预测价值,为临床医生在治疗决策中提供了额外的辅助。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09a0/11341746/0d30e141716a/12282_2024_1591_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09a0/11341746/9bd446a0c393/12282_2024_1591_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09a0/11341746/967253365fd5/12282_2024_1591_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09a0/11341746/4507f6a32ed9/12282_2024_1591_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09a0/11341746/b22eb29f1aa5/12282_2024_1591_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09a0/11341746/be6108949fce/12282_2024_1591_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09a0/11341746/0d30e141716a/12282_2024_1591_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09a0/11341746/9bd446a0c393/12282_2024_1591_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09a0/11341746/967253365fd5/12282_2024_1591_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09a0/11341746/4507f6a32ed9/12282_2024_1591_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09a0/11341746/b22eb29f1aa5/12282_2024_1591_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09a0/11341746/be6108949fce/12282_2024_1591_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09a0/11341746/0d30e141716a/12282_2024_1591_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

[1]
A novel nomogram and survival analysis for different lymph node status in breast cancer based on the SEER database.

Breast Cancer. 2024-9

[2]
Effect of T Stages on the Choice of Axillary Evaluation Modality in Breast Cancer Patients With 1-2 Sentinel Lymph Node Metastases.

Clin Breast Cancer. 2024-6

[3]
Nomograms predict survival of patients with lymph node-positive, luminal a breast cancer.

BMC Cancer. 2021-8-28

[4]
Nomogram for Predicting the Overall Survival of Patients With Breast Cancer With Pathologic Nodal Status N3.

Clin Breast Cancer. 2020-12

[5]
Nomogram models for stratified prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients (cN0).

Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022

[6]
Nomogram for predicting preoperative regional lymph nodes metastasis in patients with metaplastic breast cancer: a SEER population-based study.

BMC Cancer. 2021-5-17

[7]
A novel nomogram and risk classification system for predicting lymph node metastasis of breast mucinous carcinoma: A SEER-based study.

Cancer Med. 2022-12

[8]
Establishment of Prognostic Nomogram for Male Breast Cancer Patients: A Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Database Analysis.

Cancer Control. 2024

[9]
A Prognostic Model Based on the Log Odds Ratio of Positive Lymph Nodes Predicts Prognosis of Patients with Rectal Cancer.

J Gastrointest Cancer. 2024-9

[10]
An exploratory study of whether axillary lymph node dissection can be avoided in breast cancer patients with positive lymph nodes.

Transl Cancer Res. 2024-2-29

引用本文的文献

[1]
Extratumoral signs on mammography as a novel prognostic indicator for breast cancer: evidence from malignant nonspiculate and noncalcified masses.

Am J Transl Res. 2025-7-15

[2]
Development, verification, and comparison of a risk stratification model to identify potential population benefiting from chemotherapy in non-metastatic male breast cancer.

Sci Rep. 2025-7-7

[3]
A preliminary study on diffusion-weighted imaging with background suppression and maximum intensity projection for screening internal mammary lymph node metastasis of breast cancer.

Acta Radiol Open. 2025-6-12

[4]
Identification of the optimal candidates to benefit from surgery and chemotherapy among elderly female breast cancer patients with bone metastases.

Sci Rep. 2025-2-8

[5]
Predicting Axillary Metastasis of Breast Cancer Patients with MRI Relaxometry.

Diagnostics (Basel). 2025-1-15

本文引用的文献

[1]
Clinicopathological analysis and prognostic treatment study of angiosarcoma of the breast: a SEER population-based analysis.

World J Surg Oncol. 2023-5-9

[2]
Axillary lymph node dissection: Dead or still alive?

Breast. 2023-6

[3]
The need to tailor the omission of axillary lymph node dissection to patients with good prognosis and sentinel node micro-metastases.

Cancer Med. 2023-2

[4]
Nomogram models for stratified prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients (cN0).

Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022

[5]
American Cancer Society's report on the status of cancer disparities in the United States, 2021.

CA Cancer J Clin. 2022-3

[6]
Adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer patients with axillary lymph node micrometastases.

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021-6

[7]
Clinicopathological features of breast cancer patients with internal mammary and/or supraclavicular lymph node recurrence without distant metastasis.

BMC Cancer. 2020-9-29

[8]
Optimal radiotherapy for patients with internal mammary lymph node metastasis from breast cancer.

Radiat Oncol. 2020-3-3

[9]
Which patients with sentinel node-positive breast cancer after breast conservation still receive completion axillary lymph node dissection in routine clinical practice?

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018-10-12

[10]
Survival analysis of early-stage breast cancer patients undergoing axillary lymph node dissection and sentinel lymph node dissection.

Am J Surg. 2018-7-24

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索