• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国医院干预措施预防和管理患者针对医生的攻击和暴力行为的重要性和可行性:一项德尔菲研究。

The importance and feasibility of hospital interventions to prevent and manage patient aggression and violence against physicians in China: a Delphi study.

机构信息

Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

School of International and Public Affairs, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Hum Resour Health. 2024 May 27;22(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12960-024-00914-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12960-024-00914-z
PMID:38802830
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11131301/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Aggression and violence by patient (and their relatives/friends) is widely acknowledged as a serious occupational hazard, with physicians being particularly susceptible to witnessing and experiencing such incidents within hospitals. Research has shown that the negative consequences of such aggression and violence are not only felt at the individual level, but also at the team and organizational levels. Understanding how to prevent and manage this behavior towards physicians in hospitals is urgent and not fully researched. While there are many potentially effective interventions, it is unclear which ones would be valuable and feasible for Chinese hospitals. Because patient aggression and violence may occur more frequently in Chinese hospitals than in other countries, this suggests that cultural differences play a role and that tailored interventions may be needed.

METHOD

We conducted a Delphi study to reach a consensus on the importance and feasibility of hospital interventions to prevent and manage patient (and their relatives/friends) aggression and violence against physicians in Chinese hospitals. Seventeen experts in China were invited to complete online questionnaires over three rounds.

RESULTS

After three rounds, consensus was achieved concerning 44 interventions, five other interventions were rejected, and no consensus was reached on another two. These interventions were clustered into eight categories: environment design, access and entrance, staffing and working practices, leadership and culture, training and education, support, during/after-the-event actions, and hospital policy. Each category is considered important in preventing and managing patient (and their relatives/friends) aggression and violence towards physicians in Chinese hospitals. This study also investigated the feasibility of the suggested interventions and found that 36 of the 44 interventions were considered not only relevant, but also feasible for implementation in Chinese hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides an overview of interventions that can be implemented in Chinese hospitals to prevent and manage patient (and their relatives/friends) aggression and violence before, during, and after a violent incident occurs.

摘要

背景

患者(及其亲属/朋友)的攻击和暴力行为被广泛认为是一种严重的职业危害,医生尤其容易在医院目睹和经历此类事件。研究表明,这种攻击和暴力的负面影响不仅在个人层面感受到,而且在团队和组织层面也感受到。了解如何预防和管理医院内针对医生的此类行为是当务之急,而且尚未得到充分研究。虽然有许多潜在的有效干预措施,但尚不清楚哪些对中国医院有价值和可行。由于患者的攻击和暴力行为在中国医院可能比在其他国家更为频繁,这表明文化差异发挥了作用,可能需要量身定制的干预措施。

方法

我们进行了一项德尔菲研究,以就中国医院预防和管理患者(及其亲属/朋友)针对医生的攻击和暴力行为的医院干预措施的重要性和可行性达成共识。邀请了中国的 17 名专家在三轮在线问卷中完成了调查。

结果

三轮过后,有 44 项干预措施达成共识,另外 5 项干预措施被拒绝,还有 2 项干预措施未达成共识。这些干预措施被分为八类:环境设计、准入和入口、人员配备和工作实践、领导力和文化、培训和教育、支持、事件发生时/之后的行动以及医院政策。每一类都被认为在预防和管理中国医院内针对医生的患者(及其亲属/朋友)的攻击和暴力行为方面很重要。本研究还调查了所建议的干预措施的可行性,发现 44 项干预措施中有 36 项不仅被认为相关,而且在中国医院实施也是可行的。

结论

本研究概述了可以在中国医院实施的干预措施,以在暴力事件发生之前、期间和之后预防和管理患者(及其亲属/朋友)的攻击和暴力行为。

相似文献

1
The importance and feasibility of hospital interventions to prevent and manage patient aggression and violence against physicians in China: a Delphi study.中国医院干预措施预防和管理患者针对医生的攻击和暴力行为的重要性和可行性:一项德尔菲研究。
Hum Resour Health. 2024 May 27;22(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12960-024-00914-z.
2
Development and evaluation of a de-escalation training intervention in adult acute and forensic units: the EDITION systematic review and feasibility trial.成人急症和法医病房中降级治疗培训干预措施的制定和评估:EDITION 系统评价和可行性试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jan;28(3):1-120. doi: 10.3310/FGGW6874.
3
Organisational interventions for preventing and minimising aggression directed towards healthcare workers by patients and patient advocates.预防和尽量减少患者及患者支持者对医护人员的攻击行为的组织干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 29;4(4):CD012662. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012662.pub2.
4
Work Related Violence As A Predictor Of Stress And Correlated Disorders In Emergency Department Healthcare Professionals.工作场所暴力作为急诊科医护人员压力及相关疾病的预测因素
Clin Ter. 2019 Mar-Apr;170(2):e110-e123. doi: 10.7417/CT.2019.2120.
5
Interventions to prevent aggression against doctors: a systematic review.预防针对医生的攻击行为的干预措施:一项系统综述
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 17;9(9):e028465. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028465.
6
Educational programs and interventions for health care staff to prevent and manage aggressive behaviors in acute hospitals: a systematic review.医疗保健人员教育计划和干预措施,以预防和管理急性医院中的攻击性行为:系统评价。
JBI Evid Synth. 2024 Apr 1;22(4):560-606. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-22-00409.
7
"I think we still do too little": measures to prevent violence and aggression in German emergency departments - a qualitative study.“我认为我们做得还不够”:德国急诊部门预防暴力和侵犯行为的措施——一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jan 30;23(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09044-z.
8
The prevalence of physical and verbal violence among emergency medicine physicians in military hospitals vs non-military hospitals, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: multi-center cross-sectional study.沙特阿拉伯吉达市军队医院与非军队医院急诊医师中身体和言语暴力的流行情况:多中心横断面研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Jul 29;24(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01049-z.
9
Protective and risk factors of workplace violence against nurses: A cross-sectional study.护士遭受工作场所暴力的保护和危险因素:一项横断面研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2024 Dec;33(12):4748-4758. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17169. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
10
Gender differences in workplace violence against physicians of obstetrics and gynecology in China: A questionnaire in the national congress.中国妇产科医师职场暴力的性别差异:全国大会问卷调查。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 10;13(12):e0208693. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208693. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Validating a Multidimensional Perspective of the Relationship Between Workplace Bullying, Professional Quality of Life, and Turnover Intention of Chinese Novice Nurses.验证工作场所欺凌、职业生活质量与中国新手护士离职意愿之间关系的多维视角
J Nurs Manag. 2025 May 27;2025:6653143. doi: 10.1155/jonm/6653143. eCollection 2025.
2
Perspectives of physicians on risk factors for patient aggression and violence against physicians in Chinese hospitals: a Q-methodology study.中国医院医生对患者攻击和暴力侵害医生风险因素的看法:一项Q方法研究
Hum Resour Health. 2025 Jan 20;23(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12960-025-00976-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Violence Against Physicians in the Workplace: Trends, Causes, Consequences, and Strategies for Intervention.工作场所中的医师暴力:趋势、原因、后果以及干预策略。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2022 Dec;24(12):911-924. doi: 10.1007/s11920-022-01398-1. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
2
A qualitative system dynamics model for effects of workplace violence and clinician burnout on agitation management in the emergency department.一个关于工作场所暴力和临床医生倦怠对急诊科激越管理影响的定性系统动力学模型。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jan 15;22(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07472-x.
3
Workplace Violence Prevention: Flagging Practices and Challenges in Hospitals.工作场所暴力预防:医院中的标记做法与挑战
Workplace Health Saf. 2022 Mar;70(3):126-135. doi: 10.1177/21650799211016903. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
4
Expert consensus on moving towards a value-based healthcare system in the Netherlands: a Delphi study.荷兰迈向基于价值的医疗保健系统的专家共识:一项德尔菲研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 12;11(4):e043367. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043367.
5
Delphi Technique in Health Sciences: A Map.健康科学中的德尔菲技术:一幅图谱。
Front Public Health. 2020 Sep 22;8:457. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00457. eCollection 2020.
6
Workplace violence against doctors: Characteristics, risk factors, and mitigation strategies.针对医生的职场暴力:特征、风险因素及缓解策略。
J Postgrad Med. 2020 Jul-Sep;66(3):149-154. doi: 10.4103/jpgm.JPGM_96_20.
7
Prevalence of workplace violence against healthcare workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.医护人员遭受工作场所暴力的流行率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Occup Environ Med. 2019 Dec;76(12):927-937. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2019-105849. Epub 2019 Oct 13.
8
Interventions to prevent aggression against doctors: a systematic review.预防针对医生的攻击行为的干预措施:一项系统综述
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 17;9(9):e028465. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028465.
9
Embedding Psychiatric Risk Flags Within an Electronic Health Record: Initial Findings and Lessons Learned.将精神科风险标识嵌入电子健康记录:初步发现与经验教训
Healthc Q. 2019 Jan;21(4):54-60. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2019.25739.
10
Impact and Prevalence of Physical and Verbal Violence Toward Healthcare Workers.医护人员遭受身体和言语暴力的影响和流行率。
Psychosomatics. 2018 Nov;59(6):584-590. doi: 10.1016/j.psym.2018.04.007. Epub 2018 May 9.