Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord Institute of Academic Surgery, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Colorectal Dis. 2024 Jun;26(6):1214-1222. doi: 10.1111/codi.17034. Epub 2024 May 27.
Attention is increasingly being turned to functional outcomes as being central to colorectal cancer (CRC) survivorship. The current literature may underestimate the impact of evacuatory dysfunction on patient satisfaction with bowel function after anterior resection (AR) for CRC. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of post-AR symptoms of storage and evacuatory dysfunction on patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).
A cross-sectional study was performed at an Australian hospital of patients post-AR for CRC (2012-2021). The postoperative bowel function scores used were: low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), St Mark's incontinence, Cleveland Clinic constipation and Altomare obstructive defaecation syndrome scores. Eight 'storage' and 'evacuatory' dysfunction symptoms were derived. A seven-point Likert scale measured patient satisfaction. The SF36v2® measured HRQoL. Linear regression assessed the association between symptoms, patient satisfaction and HRQoL.
Overall, 248 patients participated (mean age 70.8 years, 57.3% male), comprising 103 with rectal cancer and 145 with sigmoid cancer. Of the symptoms that had a negative impact on patient satisfaction, six reflected evacuatory dysfunction, namely excessive straining (p < 0.001), one or more unsuccessful bowel movement attempt(s)/24 h (p < 0.001), anal/vaginal digitation (p = 0.005), regular enema use (p = 0.004), toilet revisiting (p = 0.004) and >10 min toileting (p = 0.004), and four reflected storage dysfunction, namely leaking flatus (p = 0.002), faecal urgency (p = 0.005), use of antidiarrhoeal medication (p = 0.001) and incontinence-related lifestyle alterations (p < 0.001). A total of 130 patients (53.5%) had 'no LARS', 56 (23.1%) had 'minor LARS' and 57 (23.4%) had 'major LARS'. Fifty-seven (44.5%) patients classified as having 'no LARS' had evacuatory dysfunction.
Postoperative storage and evacuatory dysfunction symptoms have an adverse impact on patient satisfaction and HRQoL post-AR. The importance of comprehensively documenting symptoms of evacuatory dysfunction is highlighted. Further research is required to develop a patient satisfaction-weighted LARS-specific HRQoL instrument.
人们越来越关注功能性结果,认为其是结直肠癌(CRC)生存的核心。目前的文献可能低估了排便功能障碍对 CRC 前切除术(AR)后患者对肠道功能满意度的影响。本研究旨在调查 AR 后储便和排粪功能障碍症状对患者满意度和健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的影响。
在澳大利亚一家医院对接受 AR 治疗的 CRC 患者(2012-2021 年)进行了一项横断面研究。使用的术后肠道功能评分包括:低位前切除术综合征(LARS)、St Mark 失禁、克利夫兰便秘和 Altomare 阻塞性排便障碍综合征评分。从八个“储便”和“排粪”功能障碍症状中得出。采用七点 Likert 量表测量患者满意度。SF36v2® 量表测量 HRQoL。线性回归评估症状与患者满意度和 HRQoL 之间的关系。
共有 248 名患者参与了研究(平均年龄 70.8 岁,57.3%为男性),其中 103 例为直肠癌,145 例为乙状结肠癌。对患者满意度有负面影响的症状中,有 6 个反映了排粪功能障碍,即过度用力(p<0.001)、24 小时内一次或多次排便失败(p<0.001)、肛门/阴道触诊(p=0.005)、常规灌肠使用(p=0.004)、如厕后返回(p=0.004)和排便时间超过 10 分钟(p=0.004),4 个反映了储便功能障碍,即漏出气体(p=0.002)、粪便急迫感(p=0.005)、使用止泻药(p=0.001)和与失禁相关的生活方式改变(p<0.001)。共有 130 名患者(53.5%)为“无 LARS”,56 名(23.1%)为“轻度 LARS”,57 名(23.4%)为“重度 LARS”。57 名(44.5%)被归类为“无 LARS”的患者存在排粪功能障碍。
术后储便和排粪功能障碍症状对 AR 后患者的满意度和 HRQoL 有不良影响。强调全面记录排粪功能障碍症状的重要性。需要进一步研究开发一种基于患者满意度加权的 LARS 特异性 HRQoL 工具。