Suppr超能文献

脑脊液鼻漏的多模态诊断:最新综述与新兴概念

Multimodal diagnosis of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea: State of the art review and emerging concepts.

作者信息

Torabi Sina J, Abiri Arash, Chen Xinlei, Senel Mehmet, Hsu Frank P K, Lupták Andrej, Khine Michelle, Kuan Edward C

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery University of California Irvine California USA.

Department of Biomedical Engineering University of California Irvine California USA.

出版信息

Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2024 May 27;9(3):e1272. doi: 10.1002/lio2.1272. eCollection 2024 Jun.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Currently, diagnosis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea relies on a multimodal approach, increasing costs and ultimately delaying diagnosis. In the United States and internationally, the crux of such a diagnosis relies on confirmation testing (via biomarkers) and localization (e.g., imaging). Biomarker testing may require analysis at an outside facility, resulting in delays diagnosis and treatment. In addition, specialized imaging may be nonspecific and often requires an active leak for diagnosis. There remains a clear need for innovative new technology.

METHODS

A comprehensive review was conducted on both foundational and innovative scholarly articles regarding current and emerging diagnosis modalities for CSF.

RESULTS

Current modalities in CSF rhinorrhea diagnosis and localization include laboratory tests (namely, B2T immunofixation), imaging (CT and/or MRI) with or without intrathecal administration, and surgical exploration. Each of these modalities carry flaws, risks, and benefits, ultimately contributing to delays in diagnosis and morbidity. Promising emerging technologies include lateral flow immunoassays (LFI) and biologically functionalized field-effect transistors (BioFET). Nevertheless, these carry some drawbacks of their own, and require further validation.

CONCLUSION

CSF rhinorrhea remains a challenging diagnosis, requiring a multimodal approach to differentiate from nonpathologic causes of rhinorrhea. Current methods in diagnosis are imperfect, as the ideal test would be a readily accessible, inexpensive, rapid, highly accurate point-of-care test without the need for excess fluid or specialized processing. Critical work is being done to develop promising, new, improved tests, though a clear successor has not yet emerged.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A.

摘要

目的

目前,脑脊液鼻漏的诊断依赖于多模式方法,这增加了成本并最终延迟了诊断。在美国和国际上,这种诊断的关键在于确认测试(通过生物标志物)和定位(例如影像学检查)。生物标志物检测可能需要在外部机构进行分析,从而导致诊断和治疗延迟。此外,专门的影像学检查可能不具有特异性,并且通常需要存在活动性漏液才能进行诊断。显然仍需要创新的新技术。

方法

对有关脑脊液当前和新兴诊断方式的基础和创新学术文章进行了全面综述。

结果

脑脊液鼻漏诊断和定位的当前方式包括实验室检查(即B2T免疫固定)、有无鞘内给药的影像学检查(CT和/或MRI)以及手术探查。这些方式各自都有缺陷、风险和益处,最终导致诊断延迟和发病率上升。有前景的新兴技术包括侧向流动免疫分析(LFI)和生物功能化场效应晶体管(BioFET)。然而,这些技术自身也存在一些缺点,需要进一步验证。

结论

脑脊液鼻漏仍然是一个具有挑战性的诊断,需要采用多模式方法来与非病理性鼻漏原因相鉴别。当前的诊断方法并不完美,因为理想的检测方法应该是一种易于获取、价格低廉、快速、高度准确的即时检测方法,无需过多液体或专门处理。尽管尚未出现明确的替代方法,但正在开展关键工作以开发有前景的新型改进检测方法。

证据级别

无。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bff/11129547/00af50f8ea81/LIO2-9-e1272-g004.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验