Division of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 3710McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
12362Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, 3710McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2022 May;36(3):397-406. doi: 10.1177/19458924211060918. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea results from abnormal communications between the subarachnoid and sinonasal spaces. Accurate preoperative diagnosis and localization are vital for positive clinical outcomes. However, the diagnosis and localization of CSF rhinorrhea remain suboptimal due to a lack of accurate understanding of test characteristics.
This systematic review aims to assess the diagnostic accuracy of various tests and imaging modalities for diagnosing and localizing CSF rhinorrhea.
A systematic review of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
Our search identified 4039 articles-53 cohort studies and 24 case series describing 1622 patients were included. The studies were heterogeneous and had a wide range of sensitivities and specificities. Many specificities were incalculable due to a lack of true negative and false positive results, thus precluding a meta-analysis. Median sensitivities and specificities were calculated for cohort studies of the following investigations: high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) 0.93/0.50 (sensitivity/specificity), magnetic resonance cisternography (MRC) 0.94/0.77, computed tomography cisternography (CTC) 0.95/1.00, radionuclide cisternography (RNC) 0.90/0.50, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cisternography (CEMRC) 0.99/1.00, endoscopy 0.58/1.00, topical intranasal fluorescein (TIF) 1.00/incalculable, intrathecal fluorescein (ITF) 0.96/1.00. Case series were reviewed separately. Etiology and site-specific data were also analyzed.
MR cisternography is more accurate than high-resolution CT at diagnosing and localizing CSF rhinorrhea. CT cisternography, contrast-enhanced MR cisternography, and radionuclide cisternography have good diagnostic characteristics but are invasive. Intrathecal fluorescein shows promising data but has not been widely adopted for purely diagnostic use. Office endoscopy has limited data but does not sufficiently diagnose CSF rhinorrhea independently. These findings confirm with current guidelines and evidence.
脑脊液(CSF)鼻漏是由于蛛网膜下腔和鼻旁窦之间的异常沟通引起的。准确的术前诊断和定位对于获得积极的临床结果至关重要。然而,由于对测试特征缺乏准确的了解,CSF 鼻漏的诊断和定位仍然不理想。
本系统评价旨在评估各种测试和成像方式诊断和定位 CSF 鼻漏的诊断准确性。
根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目,对 MEDLINE 和 EMBASE 数据库进行了系统评价。
我们的搜索确定了 4039 篇文章-53 项队列研究和 24 项病例系列,共描述了 1622 名患者。这些研究具有异质性,并且敏感性和特异性范围广泛。由于缺乏真正的阴性和假阳性结果,许多特异性无法计算,因此无法进行荟萃分析。对于以下研究的队列研究计算了中位数敏感性和特异性:高分辨率计算机断层扫描(HRCT)0.93/0.50(敏感性/特异性),磁共振脑池造影(MRC)0.94/0.77,计算机断层脑池造影(CTC)0.95/1.00,放射性核素脑池造影(RNC)0.90/0.50,和对比增强磁共振脑池造影(CEMRC)0.99/1.00,内窥镜检查 0.58/1.00,局部鼻内荧光素(TIF)1.00/不可计算,鞘内荧光素(ITF)0.96/1.00。单独审查了病例系列。还分析了病因和部位特异性数据。
磁共振脑池造影术比高分辨率 CT 更准确地诊断和定位 CSF 鼻漏。CT 脑池造影术、对比增强磁共振脑池造影术和放射性核素脑池造影术具有良好的诊断特征,但具有侵入性。鞘内荧光素显示出有前途的数据,但尚未广泛用于纯粹的诊断用途。办公室内窥镜检查的数据有限,但不能独立充分诊断 CSF 鼻漏。这些发现与当前的指南和证据相符。