Shupler Matthew, Klompmaker Jochem O, Leung Michael, Petimar Joshua, Drouin-Chartier Jean-Philippe, Modest Anna M, Hacker Michele, Farid Huma, James Peter, Hernandez-Diaz Sonia, Papatheodorou Stefania
Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA.
Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA.
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 May 20;35:100775. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100775. eCollection 2024 Jul.
Few studies have investigated the relationship between the food and physical activity environment and odds of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). This study quantifies the association between densities of several types of food establishments and fitness centers with the odds of having GDM.
The density of supermarkets, fast-food restaurants, full-service restaurants, convenience stores and fitness centers at 500, 1000 and 1500 m (m) buffers was counted at residential addresses of 68,779 pregnant individuals from Eastern Massachusetts during 2000-2016. The 'healthy food index' assessed the relative availability of healthy (supermarkets) vs unhealthy (fast-food restaurants, convenience stores) food retailers. Multivariable logistic regression quantified the cross-sectional association between exposure variables and the odds of having GDM, adjusting for individual and area-level characteristics. Effect modification by area-level socioeconomic status (SES) was assessed.
In fully adjusted models, pregnant individuals living in the highest density tertile of fast-food restaurants had higher GDM odds compared to those living in the lowest density tertile (500 m: odds ratio (OR):1.17 95% CI: [1.04, 1.31]; 1000 m: 1.33 95% CI: [1.15, 1.53]); 1500 m: 1.18 95% CI: [1.01, 1.38]). Greater residential density of supermarkets was associated with lower odds of GDM (1000 m: 0.86 95% CI: [0.74, 0.99]; 1500 m: 0.86 95% CI: [0.72, 1.01]). Similarly, living in the highest fitness center density tertile was associated with decreased GDM odds (500 m:0.87 95% CI: [0.76, 0.99]; 1500 m: 0.89 95% CI: [0.79, 1.01]). There was no evidence of effect modification by SES and no association found between the healthy food index and GDM odds.
In Eastern Massachusetts, living near a greater density of fast-food establishments was associated with higher GDM odds. Greater residential access to supermarkets and fitness centers was associated with lower the odds of having GDM.
NIH.
很少有研究调查食物和身体活动环境与妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)患病几率之间的关系。本研究量化了几种类型的食品企业和健身中心的密度与患GDM几率之间的关联。
统计了2000年至2016年期间马萨诸塞州东部68779名孕妇居住地址周围500米、1000米和1500米缓冲区内超市、快餐店、提供全方位服务的餐厅、便利店和健身中心的密度。“健康食品指数”评估了健康食品零售商(超市)与不健康食品零售商(快餐店、便利店)的相对可及性。多变量逻辑回归量化了暴露变量与患GDM几率之间的横断面关联,并对个体和区域层面的特征进行了调整。评估了区域层面社会经济地位(SES)的效应修正。
在完全调整的模型中,居住在快餐店密度最高三分位数区域的孕妇患GDM的几率高于居住在密度最低三分位数区域的孕妇(500米:优势比(OR):1.17,95%置信区间:[1.04, 1.31];1000米:1.33,95%置信区间:[1.15, 1.53];1500米:1.18,95%置信区间:[1.01, 1.38])。超市居住密度越高,患GDM的几率越低(1000米:0.86,95%置信区间:[0.74, 0.99];1500米:0.86,95%置信区间:[0.72, 1.01])。同样,居住在健身中心密度最高三分位数区域与患GDM几率降低相关(500米:0.87,95%置信区间:[0.76, 0.99];1500米:0.89,95%置信区间:[0.79, 1.01])。没有证据表明SES有效应修正,且健康食品指数与患GDM几率之间未发现关联。
在马萨诸塞州东部,居住在快餐店密度较高的地方与患GDM几率较高相关。居民更容易到达超市和健身中心与患GDM几率较低相关。
美国国立卫生研究院。