Department of Neurology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Korea.
Institute of New Frontier Research Team, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Korea.
Eur Stroke J. 2024 Dec;9(4):981-988. doi: 10.1177/23969873241253958. Epub 2024 May 28.
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anticoagulants (AC) and antiplatelets (APT) in patients with recent small subcortical infarctions (RSSI) and atrial fibrillation (AF).
We utilized a prospective multicenter stroke registry database to identify patients with RSSI with a concurrent diagnosis of AF. Propensity score matching analysis was used to balance baseline differences among the AC-only, APT-only, and their combination groups. The main outcomes of interest were time to occurrence of minor and major bleeding, stroke recurrence, and all-cause mortality. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each outcome were calculated using the multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis.
Of the 404 eligible patients, 28.2% received APT only, 53.0% received AC only, and 18.9% received a combination of both. Notable differences were observed between these groups in terms of the 1-year stroke recurrence (APT, 32.5%; AC, 5.6%; APT + AC, 9.2%) and all-cause mortality (APT, 21.9%; AC, 6.1%; APT + AC, 14.5%), whereas the rates of bleeding events were comparable. The multivariable analysis indicated a significant association of AC alone with reduced risks of severe bleeding, stroke recurrence, and all-cause mortality compared with APT alone (aHR 0.64, 95% CI 0.41-0.98; aHR 0.11, 95% CI 0.06-0.22; aHR 0.22, 95% CI 0.11-0.44, respectively). The combination group showed a reduced risk of stroke recurrence compared to APT alone (aHR 0.19, 95% CI 0.08-0.46). These findings remained consistent with the propensity score-matched analysis.
AC showed better clinical outcomes than APT in patients with RSSI and AF. Additionally, combination therapy with AC and APT was associated with a lower risk of stroke recurrence than APT alone.
本研究旨在评估抗凝剂(AC)和抗血小板药物(APT)在近期小皮质下梗死(RSSI)和心房颤动(AF)患者中的疗效和安全性。
我们利用前瞻性多中心卒中登记数据库,确定了同时诊断为 RSSI 和 AF 的患者。采用倾向评分匹配分析来平衡 AC 组、APT 组和联合治疗组之间的基线差异。主要观察终点为轻微和严重出血、卒中复发和全因死亡率的发生时间。使用多变量 Cox 比例风险回归分析计算每个结局的调整后风险比(aHR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。
在 404 名符合条件的患者中,28.2%仅接受 APT,53.0%仅接受 AC,18.9%接受两者联合治疗。这些组在 1 年卒中复发(APT,32.5%;AC,5.6%;APT+AC,9.2%)和全因死亡率(APT,21.9%;AC,6.1%;APT+AC,14.5%)方面存在显著差异,而出血事件发生率相似。多变量分析表明,与单独使用 APT 相比,单独使用 AC 与严重出血、卒中复发和全因死亡率降低显著相关(aHR 0.64,95%CI 0.41-0.98;aHR 0.11,95%CI 0.06-0.22;aHR 0.22,95%CI 0.11-0.44)。与单独使用 APT 相比,联合治疗组卒中复发风险降低(aHR 0.19,95%CI 0.08-0.46)。这些发现与倾向评分匹配分析一致。
与 APT 相比,AC 在 RSSI 和 AF 患者中的临床结局更好。此外,与单独使用 APT 相比,AC 和 APT 联合治疗与卒中复发风险降低相关。