• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲验证肝移植预期难度分类。

European validation of the classification for the anticipated difficulty of liver transplantation.

机构信息

Department of Digestive, Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France; Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France.

Department of Digestive, Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France; Research Unit, Université de Picardie-Jules Verne, UR UPJV 7518 SSPC, Amiens, France; Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.

出版信息

HPB (Oxford). 2024 Aug;26(8):1033-1039. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.05.004. Epub 2024 May 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.hpb.2024.05.004
PMID:
38806366
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Appropriate risk stratification for the difficulty of liver transplantation (LT) is essential to guide the selection and acceptance of grafts and avoid morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

Based on 987 LTs collected from 5 centers, perioperative outcomes were analyzed across the 3 difficulty levels. Each LT was retrospectively scored from 0 to 10. Scores of 0-2, 3-5 and 6-10 were then translated into respective difficulty levels: low, moderate and high. Complications were reported according to the comprehensive complication index (CCI).

RESULTS

The difficulty level of LT in 524 (53%), 323 (32%), and 140 (14%) patients was classified as low, moderate and high, respectively. The values of major intraoperative outcomes, such as cold ischemia time (p = 0.04) and operative time (p < 0.0001) increased gradually with statistically significant values among difficulty levels. There was a corresponding increase in CCI (p = 0.04), severe complication rates (p = 0.05) and length of ICU (p = 0.01) and hospital (p = 0.004) stays across the different difficulty levels.

CONCLUSION

The LT difficulty classification has been validated.

摘要

背景

对肝移植(LT)难度进行适当的风险分层对于指导供体的选择和接受,避免发病率和死亡率至关重要。

方法

基于来自 5 个中心的 987 例 LT,分析了 3 个难度级别下的围手术期结果。每例 LT 均从 0 到 10 进行回顾性评分。0-2 分、3-5 分和 6-10 分分别表示难度级别为低、中、高。根据综合并发症指数(CCI)报告并发症。

结果

524 例(53%)、323 例(32%)和 140 例(14%)患者的 LT 难度级别分别归类为低、中、高。主要术中结局(如冷缺血时间(p=0.04)和手术时间(p<0.0001))随着难度级别的增加而逐渐增加,且差异具有统计学意义。CCI(p=0.04)、严重并发症发生率(p=0.05)以及 ICU(p=0.01)和住院(p=0.004)时间也相应增加。

结论

LT 难度分类已经得到验证。

相似文献

1
European validation of the classification for the anticipated difficulty of liver transplantation.欧洲验证肝移植预期难度分类。
HPB (Oxford). 2024 Aug;26(8):1033-1039. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.05.004. Epub 2024 May 15.
2
Early acute kidney injury after liver transplantation in patients with normal preoperative renal function.术前肾功能正常的患者肝移植术后早期急性肾损伤
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2019 Aug;43(4):475-482. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2018.07.009. Epub 2019 May 21.
3
The external validation of a difficulty scoring system for predicting the risk of intraoperative complications during laparoscopic liver resection.用于预测腹腔镜肝切除术中并发症风险的难度评分系统的外部验证
BMC Surg. 2019 Nov 27;19(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0645-y.
4
Liver transplantation for NASH cirrhosis is not performed at the expense of major post-operative morbidity.肝移植治疗 NASH 肝硬化不会导致术后重大发病率增加。
Dig Liver Dis. 2018 Jan;50(1):68-75. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2017.08.022. Epub 2017 Aug 12.
5
Impact of Perioperative Massive Transfusion on Long Term Outcomes of Liver Transplantation: a Retrospective Cohort Study.围手术期大量输血对肝移植长期结局的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Med Sci. 2021 Oct 15;18(16):3780-3787. doi: 10.7150/ijms.61697. eCollection 2021.
6
A multicentre outcome analysis to define global benchmarks for donation after circulatory death liver transplantation.多中心结局分析,定义循环死亡器官捐献肝移植的全球基准。
J Hepatol. 2022 Feb;76(2):371-382. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.10.004. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
7
Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes Between Donation After Circulatory Death and Donation After Brain Death Liver Transplantation Using the Comprehensive Complication Index.应用综合并发症指数比较心脏死亡后捐献和脑死亡后捐献肝移植术后的结局。
Ann Surg. 2017 Nov;266(5):772-778. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002419.
8
Is liver transplantation safe and effective in elderly (≥70 years) recipients? A case-controlled analysis.肝移植对于老年(≥70岁)受者是否安全有效?一项病例对照分析。
HPB (Oxford). 2014 Dec;16(12):1088-94. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12312. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
9
Technical feasibility of liver transplantation without cold storage.无冷藏的肝移植技术可行性
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014 Jan;399(1):127-33. doi: 10.1007/s00423-013-1150-x. Epub 2013 Dec 8.
10
Perioperative neurological complications after liver transplantation are best predicted by pre-transplant hepatic encephalopathy.肝移植术后围手术期神经并发症最好通过移植前肝性脑病来预测。
Neurocrit Care. 2008;8(2):253-8. doi: 10.1007/s12028-007-9020-4.