Kumar Sandeep, Bhambhu Vivek, Goyal Rohit, Gugale Shataayu, Choudhary Ganpat, Mishra Akash, Yadav Akshay, Porwal Naresh
Orthopaedics, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, Jaipur, IND.
Biostatistics, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, Jaipur, IND.
Cureus. 2024 Apr 27;16(4):e59170. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59170. eCollection 2024 Apr.
Introduction T-type fractures of the acetabulum are uncommon injuries, typically resulting in poorer long-term outcomes compared to other patterns of acetabular fractures. Our main purpose is to analyse the epidemiology, functional outcomes, and factors affecting the functional outcomes of patients with T-type acetabular fractures. Methods This prospective, single-centre study included 73 patients with T-type and T with posterior wall acetabular fractures. They underwent treatment with open reduction internal fixation using plating through the modified Stoppa, Kocher-Langenbeck (KL), or dual approach. The post-operative reduction was assessed according to Matta's criteria, and functional outcomes were evaluated using the modified Harris hip score. Results Between September 2017 and January 2023, 53 patients underwent surgery for T-type fractures (72.6%), and 20 patients were treated for T with posterior wall acetabular fractures (27.4%). The minimum follow-up period was one year, with a mean follow-up of 3.5 years. Anatomical reduction emerged as the major contributing factor towards good functional outcomes compared to satisfactory reduction according to Matta's criteria (P value: 0.006). Overall, 65 patients (89%) achieved excellent to good modified Harris hip scores, while eight patients (11%) obtained fair to poor scores. Patients with T-type fractures demonstrated better functional outcomes compared to T with posterior wall fractures (P value: 0.031). Conclusion Anatomical reduction, as assessed by Matta's reduction criteria, serves as a predictor of favourable functional outcomes. T with posterior wall fractures exhibit poor outcomes in comparison to T-type fractures. The surgical approach employed does not influence the reduction or the final functional outcome of the patient.
髋臼T型骨折是一种罕见的损伤,与其他类型的髋臼骨折相比,其长期预后通常较差。我们的主要目的是分析髋臼T型骨折患者的流行病学、功能预后以及影响功能预后的因素。方法:这项前瞻性单中心研究纳入了73例髋臼T型骨折和T型合并后壁骨折的患者。他们接受了通过改良的Stoppa入路、Kocher-Langenbeck(KL)入路或双入路进行钢板切开复位内固定治疗。术后复位根据Matta标准进行评估,功能预后采用改良Harris髋关节评分进行评价。结果:在2017年9月至2023年1月期间,53例患者接受了T型骨折手术(72.6%),20例患者接受了T型合并后壁髋臼骨折治疗(27.4%)。最短随访期为1年,平均随访3.5年。与根据Matta标准的满意复位相比,解剖复位是功能预后良好的主要因素(P值:0.006)。总体而言,65例患者(89%)获得了优良的改良Harris髋关节评分,而8例患者(11%)获得了中差评分。T型骨折患者的功能预后优于T型合并后壁骨折患者(P值:0.031)。结论:根据Matta复位标准评估的解剖复位可作为良好功能预后的预测指标。与T型骨折相比,T型合并后壁骨折的预后较差。所采用的手术入路不影响患者的复位或最终功能预后。