• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应用 NOAEL 进行临床剂量递增的估计和翻译不确定性。

The estimation and translation uncertainties in applying NOAEL to clinical dose escalation.

机构信息

Clinical Pharmacology Modelling and Simulation, GSK, London, UK.

Clinical Pharmacology, Modelling and Simulation, Parexel International, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Jun;17(6):e13831. doi: 10.1111/cts.13831.

DOI:10.1111/cts.13831
PMID:38808564
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11134224/
Abstract

The systemic exposure at the no-observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) estimated from animals is an important criterion commonly applied to guard the safety of participants in clinical trials of investigational drugs. However, the discrepancy in toxicity profile between species is widely recognized. The objective of the work reported here was to assess, via simulation, the level of uncertainty in the NOAEL estimated from an animal species and the effectiveness of applying its associated exposure value to minimizing the toxicity risk to human. Simulations were conducted for dose escalation of an investigational new chemical entity with hypothetical exposure-response models for the dose-limiting toxicity under a variety of conditions, in terms of between-species relative sensitivity to the toxicity and the between-subject variability in the key parameters determining the sensitivity and pharmacokinetics. Results show a high uncertainty in the NOAEL estimation. Notably, even when the animal species and humans are assumed to have the same sensitivity, which may not be realistic, limiting clinical dose to the exposure at the NOAEL that has been identified in the animals carries a high risk of either causing toxicity or under-dosing, hence undermining the therapeutic potential of the drug candidate. These findings highlight the importance of understanding the mechanism of the toxicity profile and its cross-species translatability, as well as the importance of understanding the dose requirement for achieving adequate pharmacology.

摘要

从动物身上估计的无观察到不良效应水平(NOAEL)的全身暴露是一个常用的标准,用于保护临床试验中研究药物参与者的安全。然而,物种间毒性特征的差异是广泛公认的。这里报告的工作的目的是通过模拟来评估从动物物种估计的 NOAEL 水平的不确定性程度,以及应用其相关暴露值来最小化人类毒性风险的有效性。在各种条件下,对具有假设的暴露-反应模型的新型化学实体进行剂量递增模拟,以评估对毒性的物种间相对敏感性和决定敏感性和药代动力学的关键参数的个体间变异性。结果表明,NOAEL 估计存在高度不确定性。值得注意的是,即使假设动物和人类对毒性的敏感性相同(这可能不现实),将限制临床剂量限制在动物中确定的 NOAEL 暴露水平,也会带来毒性或剂量不足的高风险,从而破坏候选药物的治疗潜力。这些发现强调了理解毒性特征的机制及其跨物种可转移性的重要性,以及理解实现充分药理学所需的剂量要求的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caec/11134224/f5a54db6863c/CTS-17-e13831-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caec/11134224/0c742b45f9be/CTS-17-e13831-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caec/11134224/b68b892b224d/CTS-17-e13831-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caec/11134224/10bb49724f01/CTS-17-e13831-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caec/11134224/31fb3d573da7/CTS-17-e13831-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caec/11134224/f5a54db6863c/CTS-17-e13831-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caec/11134224/0c742b45f9be/CTS-17-e13831-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caec/11134224/b68b892b224d/CTS-17-e13831-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caec/11134224/10bb49724f01/CTS-17-e13831-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caec/11134224/31fb3d573da7/CTS-17-e13831-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caec/11134224/f5a54db6863c/CTS-17-e13831-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The estimation and translation uncertainties in applying NOAEL to clinical dose escalation.应用 NOAEL 进行临床剂量递增的估计和翻译不确定性。
Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Jun;17(6):e13831. doi: 10.1111/cts.13831.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
4
Surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus: exploring the uncertainty through systematic review, expert workshop and economic modelling.巴雷特食管的监测:通过系统评价、专家研讨会和经济模型探索不确定性
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(8):1-142, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10080.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
6
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
9
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
10
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.

本文引用的文献

1
Artificial Intelligence in Drug Toxicity Prediction: Recent Advances, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.人工智能在药物毒性预测中的应用:最新进展、挑战与未来展望。
J Chem Inf Model. 2023 May 8;63(9):2628-2643. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.3c00200. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
2
Concept and application of the probability of pharmacological success (PoPS) as a decision tool in drug development: a position paper.药理学成功概率 (PoPS) 在药物研发决策工具中的概念和应用:立场文件。
J Transl Med. 2023 Jan 11;21(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12967-022-03849-y.
3
Machine Learning Toxicity Prediction: Latest Advances by Toxicity End Point.
机器学习毒性预测:按毒性终点划分的最新进展
ACS Omega. 2022 Dec 13;7(51):47536-47546. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c05693. eCollection 2022 Dec 27.
4
A History of Regulatory Animal Testing: What Can We Learn?监管动物测试的历史:我们能从中吸取什么教训?
Altern Lab Anim. 2022 Sep;50(5):322-329. doi: 10.1177/02611929221118001. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
5
Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Toxicological Sciences.机器学习和人工智能在毒理学科学中的应用。
Toxicol Sci. 2022 Aug 25;189(1):7-19. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfac075.
6
Translating pharmacology models effectively to predict therapeutic benefit.有效地将药理学模型转化为预测治疗效果。
Drug Discov Today. 2022 Jun;27(6):1604-1621. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2022.03.009. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
7
BIA 10-2474: Some Lessons are Clear but Important Questions Remain Unanswered.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Feb;111(2):343-345. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2495.
8
De-risking Clinical Trials: The BIAL Phase I Trial in Foresight.降低临床试验风险:BIAL前瞻性一期试验
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Feb;111(2):362-365. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2498. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
9
Modeling approaches for reducing safety-related attrition in drug discovery and development: a review on myelotoxicity, immunotoxicity, cardiovascular toxicity, and liver toxicity.用于减少药物发现和开发中与安全性相关的淘汰率的建模方法:对骨髓毒性、免疫毒性、心血管毒性和肝毒性的综述。
Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2021 Nov;16(11):1365-1390. doi: 10.1080/17460441.2021.1931114. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
10
Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of FAAH Inhibitor BIA 10-2474: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study in Healthy Volunteers.FAAH 抑制剂 BIA 10-2474 的安全性、耐受性和药代动力学:在健康志愿者中进行的一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照研究。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Feb;111(2):391-403. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2290. Epub 2021 Jun 24.