• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保乳手术与乳房切除术治疗化生性乳腺癌:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。

Breast conservation versus mastectomy for metaplastic breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Harris Christopher G, Azimi Farhad, Chan Belinda, Graham Susannah, Mak Cindy, Warrier Sanjay, Eslick Guy D

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Department of Breast Surgery, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2025 Apr;21(2):150-155. doi: 10.1111/ajco.14089. Epub 2024 May 29.

DOI:10.1111/ajco.14089
PMID:38808740
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11880979/
Abstract

Metaplastic breast cancer is a rare aggressive subtype of breast cancer for which there are no clear treatment guidelines regarding the optimal surgical approach. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate survival outcomes of patients with metaplastic breast cancer undergoing breast conservation compared with mastectomy. We identified studies from MEDLINE, Pubmed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, the Cochrane Library Register of Controlled Trials and the EBM Reviews Register. Studies were deemed suitable for inclusion where they compared breast-conserving surgery to mastectomy with the primary outcome of overall survival. Survival data were pooled using a random-effects model. From the 456 citations screened by our search, three studies were assessed as eligible for inclusion. There were a total of 2995 patients who underwent mastectomy and 1909 who underwent breast conservation. The median follow-up time was 43 months. Meta-analysis demonstrated no significant difference between breast conservation and mastectomy (pooled HR 0.89, 95% CI, 0.56-1.42, p = 0.631). Wide local excision, in conjunction with adjuvant radiation and judicious use of chemotherapy, may be a reasonable alternative to mastectomy as surgical management of metaplastic breast cancer as part of an individualized, multidisciplinary approach.

摘要

化生性乳腺癌是一种罕见的侵袭性乳腺癌亚型,目前尚无关于最佳手术方式的明确治疗指南。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估接受保乳手术与乳房切除术的化生性乳腺癌患者的生存结局。我们从MEDLINE、PubMed、EMBASE、谷歌学术、Cochrane对照试验图书馆注册库和循证医学评价注册库中检索研究。若研究将保乳手术与乳房切除术进行比较,并将总生存作为主要结局,则被认为适合纳入。生存数据采用随机效应模型进行汇总。在我们检索的456篇文献中,有三项研究被评估为符合纳入标准。共有2995例患者接受了乳房切除术,1909例患者接受了保乳手术。中位随访时间为43个月。荟萃分析表明,保乳手术与乳房切除术之间无显著差异(合并风险比0.89,95%可信区间0.56 - 1.42,p = 0.631)。作为化生性乳腺癌手术治疗的一部分,广泛局部切除联合辅助放疗及合理使用化疗,作为个体化多学科方法的一部分,可能是乳房切除术的合理替代方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbba/11880979/403e09cb2cd3/AJCO-21-150-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbba/11880979/693e2f994ccd/AJCO-21-150-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbba/11880979/403e09cb2cd3/AJCO-21-150-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbba/11880979/693e2f994ccd/AJCO-21-150-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbba/11880979/403e09cb2cd3/AJCO-21-150-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Breast conservation versus mastectomy for metaplastic breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.保乳手术与乳房切除术治疗化生性乳腺癌:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2025 Apr;21(2):150-155. doi: 10.1111/ajco.14089. Epub 2024 May 29.
2
Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery for women with primary breast cancer.原发性乳腺癌患者的肿瘤整形保乳手术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 29;10(10):CD013658. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013658.pub2.
3
Risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.对携带BRCA1或BRCA2基因突变的女性进行降低风险的双侧输卵管卵巢切除术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 24;8(8):CD012464. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012464.pub2.
4
Localization techniques for guided surgical excision of non-palpable breast lesions.不可触及乳腺病变引导手术切除的定位技术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 31;2015(12):CD009206. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009206.pub2.
5
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
6
Prophylactic mastectomy for the prevention of breast cancer.预防性乳房切除术用于预防乳腺癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18(4):CD002748. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002748.pub2.
7
Educational interventions for the management of cancer-related fatigue in adults.针对成人癌症相关疲劳管理的教育干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 24;11(11):CD008144. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008144.pub2.
8
Treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma in the elderly: a network meta-analysis.老年新诊断胶质母细胞瘤的治疗:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 23;3(3):CD013261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013261.pub2.
9
High-dose chemotherapy and autologous haematopoietic stem cell rescue for children with high-risk neuroblastoma.大剂量化疗及自体造血干细胞救援用于高危神经母细胞瘤患儿
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 5;2015(10):CD006301. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006301.pub4.
10
Bisphosphonates and other bone agents for breast cancer.用于乳腺癌的双膦酸盐及其他骨治疗药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 30;10(10):CD003474. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003474.pub4.

引用本文的文献

1
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy is Associated with Worse 5-Year Overall Survival in Patients with Metaplastic Breast Cancer Compared with Primary Surgery: A National Cancer Database Analysis.与原发手术相比,新辅助化疗与化生性乳腺癌患者较差的5年总生存率相关:一项国家癌症数据库分析
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Aug 20. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-18085-z.
2
AGO Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Early Breast Cancer: Update 2025.AGO早期乳腺癌患者诊断与治疗建议:2025年更新版
Breast Care (Basel). 2025 Mar 8:1-19. doi: 10.1159/000545019.
3
Sexual Function in Women Diagnosed with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome.

本文引用的文献

1
Breast-Conserving Surgery or Mastectomy?: Impact on Survival.保乳手术还是乳房切除术?对生存的影响
Ann Surg Open. 2022 Oct 5;3(4):e205. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000205. eCollection 2022 Dec.
2
Metaplastic breast cancer: an all-round multidisciplinary consensus.化生性乳腺癌:全面的多学科共识。
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2023 Jul 1;32(4):348-363. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000794. Epub 2023 May 12.
3
Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast: matched cohort analysis of recurrence and survival.乳腺化生性癌:复发与生存的配对队列分析
被诊断为遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌综合征的女性的性功能
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jul 21;16(14):2601. doi: 10.3390/cancers16142601.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Jun;199(2):355-361. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-06923-1. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
4
Metaplastic breast cancer: A review.化生性乳腺癌:综述。
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2023 Feb;182:103924. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.103924. Epub 2023 Jan 22.
5
Triple-negative metaplastic breast cancer: treatment and prognosis by type of surgery.三阴性化生性乳腺癌:手术类型对治疗及预后的影响
Am J Transl Res. 2021 Oct 15;13(10):11689-11696. eCollection 2021.
6
A Multicenter Phase II Trial of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab in Unresectable or Metastatic Metaplastic Breast Cancer: Cohort 36 of Dual Anti-CTLA-4 and Anti-PD-1 Blockade in Rare Tumors (DART, SWOG S1609).多中心二期临床试验:依匹单抗联合纳武利尤单抗治疗不可切除或转移性间变性乳腺癌:双重抗 CTLA-4 和抗 PD-1 阻断在罕见肿瘤中的队列 36(DART,SWOG S1609)。
Clin Cancer Res. 2022 Jan 15;28(2):271-278. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-2182. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
7
The different outcomes between breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy and mastectomy in metaplastic breast cancer: A population-based study.保乳手术联合放疗与乳房切除术治疗骨化性纤维黏液样肿瘤的不同结局:一项基于人群的研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 2;16(9):e0256893. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256893. eCollection 2021.
8
Survival outcomes after breast-conserving therapy compared with mastectomy for patients with early-stage metaplastic breast cancer: a population-based study of 2412 patients.早期多形性乳腺癌患者保乳治疗与乳房切除术的生存结局比较:一项基于人群的 2412 例患者研究。
Breast. 2021 Aug;58:10-17. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.03.010. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
9
Metaplastic Breast Carcinoma: Experience of a Tertiary Cancer Center in the Middle East.化生性乳腺癌:中东一家三级癌症中心的经验
Cancer Control. 2021 Jan-Dec;28:10732748211004889. doi: 10.1177/10732748211004889.
10
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.