From the Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (Claessens, Imhof, Wisse); University Eye Clinic Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands (Wanten, Bauer, Nuijts); Oogcentrum Noordholland, Heerhugowaard, the Netherlands (Vrijman, Selek, Wouters); Department of Ophthalmology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands (Reus, van Dorst); Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery, a Karl Landsteiner Institute, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria (Findl, Ruiss); Eye Clinic Sulzbach, Knappschaft Hospital Saar, Sulzbach, Germany (Boden); Mount Saint Peter Eye Clinic, Trier, Germany (Januschowski).
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2024 Sep 1;50(9):947-955. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001492.
To compare web-based, self-administered follow-up after cataract surgery to conventional face-to-face follow-up.
Eye clinics in the Netherlands, Austria, and Germany.
Randomized controlled trial with an embedded method comparison study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04809402).
Routine patients with cataract were randomized into 2 groups: The telemonitoring group undertook web-based vision self-assessments and questionnaires from home, while the usual care group received conventional care. All participants had a 4- to 6-week postoperative clinic visit for safety and validation purposes. Outcomes included, the web test's accuracy for assessing postoperative visual acuity (VA) and refractive error, adverse event rates, and patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs).
94 participants (188 eyes) were enrolled. Web-based uncorrected distance VA testing demonstrated a negligible mean difference (-0.03 ± 0.14 logMAR) when compared with conventional Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart testing, with 95% limits of agreement ranging from -0.30 to 0.24 logMAR. The web-based refraction assessment overestimated the postoperative refractive error (mean difference in spherical equivalent 0.15 ± 0.67 diopters), resulting in a poorer corrected distance VA compared with subjective refraction (mean 0.1 vs -0.1 logMAR). Rates of adverse events and unscheduled consultations were minimal across both groups. Preoperative and postoperative PROM questionnaires had a 100% response rate. Visual functioning (Catquest-9SF and National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25) improved postoperatively (mean improvement -0.80 and 16.70, respectively) and did not significantly differ between the 2 groups.
The patients with cataract in this study effectively provided postoperative outcome data using a web interface. Both conventional and web-based follow-ups yielded similar PROMs and adverse event rates. Future developments should reduce the variability in the web-based VA test and yield representative refraction outcomes.
比较白内障手术后基于网络的自我管理随访与传统的面对面随访。
荷兰、奥地利和德国的眼科诊所。
随机对照试验,嵌入方法比较研究(ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT04809402)。
常规白内障患者随机分为 2 组:远程监测组在家中进行基于网络的视力自我评估和问卷调查,而常规护理组接受常规护理。所有参与者均在术后 4-6 周进行门诊检查,以确保安全性和验证目的。结果包括网络测试评估术后视力(VA)和屈光不正的准确性、不良事件发生率和患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)。
共纳入 94 名患者(188 只眼)。与传统的早期糖尿病视网膜病变研究图表测试相比,基于网络的未矫正远视力测试结果显示出可忽略的平均差异(-0.03±0.14 logMAR),95%的一致性区间为-0.30 至 0.24 logMAR。基于网络的屈光评估结果高估了术后屈光不正(平均等效球镜差异 0.15±0.67 屈光度),导致矫正远视力比主观屈光更差(平均 0.1 比-0.1 logMAR)。两组的不良事件和非计划咨询发生率均较低。术前和术后 PROM 问卷的回复率均为 100%。视觉功能(Catquest-9SF 和国家眼科研究所视觉功能问卷-25)在术后均有所改善(平均改善分别为-0.80 和 16.70),两组之间无显著差异。
本研究中的白内障患者通过网络界面有效地提供了术后结果数据。传统和基于网络的随访均产生了相似的 PROMs 和不良事件发生率。未来的发展应减少基于网络的 VA 测试的变异性,并获得有代表性的屈光结果。