Suppr超能文献

一种用于测量视力和屈光不正的独立网络工具的验证(即显验光与在线屈光评估试验):前瞻性开放标签非劣效性临床试验。

Validation of an Independent Web-Based Tool for Measuring Visual Acuity and Refractive Error (the Manifest versus Online Refractive Evaluation Trial): Prospective Open-Label Noninferiority Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Wisse Robert P L, Muijzer Marc B, Cassano Francesco, Godefrooij Daniel A, Prevoo Yves F D M, Soeters Nienke

机构信息

Utrecht Cornea Research Group, Ophthalmology Department, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Easee BV, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2019 Nov 8;21(11):e14808. doi: 10.2196/14808.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Digital tools provide a unique opportunity to increase access to eye care. We developed a Web-based test that measures visual acuity and both spherical and cylindrical refractive errors. This test is Conformité Européenne marked and available on the Easee website. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of this Web-based tool with traditional subjective manifest refraction in a prospective open-label noninferiority clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of a Web-based refraction compared with a manifest refraction (golden standard).

METHODS

Healthy volunteers from 18 to 40 years of age, with a refraction error between -6 and +4 diopter (D), were eligible. Each participant performed the Web-based test, and the reference test was performed by an optometrist. An absolute difference in refractive error of <0.5 D was considered noninferior. Reliability was assessed by using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Both uncorrected and corrected visual acuity were measured.

RESULTS

A total of 200 eyes in 100 healthy volunteers were examined. The Web-based assessment of refractive error had excellent correlation with the reference test (ICC=0.92) and was considered noninferior to the reference test. Uncorrected visual acuity was similar with the Web-based test and the reference test (P=.21). Visual acuity was significantly improved using the prescription obtained by using the Web-based tool (P<.01). The Web-based test provided the best results in participants with mild myopia (ie, <3 D), with a mean difference of 0.02 (SD 0.49) D (P=.48) and yielding a corrected visual acuity of >1.0 in 90% (n=77) of participants.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that Web-based eye testing is a valid and safe method for measuring visual acuity and refractive error in healthy eyes, particularly for mild myopia. This tool can be used for screening purposes, and it is an easily accessible alternative to the subjective manifest refraction test.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03313921; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03313921.

摘要

背景

数字工具为增加眼科护理的可及性提供了独特机遇。我们开发了一种基于网络的测试,可测量视力以及球镜和柱镜屈光不正。该测试具有欧洲合格认证,可在Easee网站上获取。本研究的目的是在前瞻性开放标签非劣效性临床试验中,比较这种基于网络的工具与传统主观验光的疗效。

目的

本研究的目的是评估基于网络的验光与验光(金标准)相比的结果。

方法

年龄在18至40岁之间、屈光不正度数在-6至+4屈光度(D)之间的健康志愿者符合条件。每位参与者进行基于网络的测试,参考测试由验光师进行。屈光不正绝对差值<0.5 D被认为是非劣效的。使用组内相关系数(ICC)评估可靠性。测量未矫正和矫正视力。

结果

共检查了100名健康志愿者的200只眼睛。基于网络的屈光不正评估与参考测试具有极好的相关性(ICC = 0.92),并被认为不劣于参考测试。基于网络的测试和参考测试的未矫正视力相似(P = 0.21)。使用基于网络的工具获得的处方,视力有显著改善(P < 0.01)。基于网络的测试在轻度近视(即<3 D)参与者中提供了最佳结果,平均差值为0.02(标准差0.49)D(P = 0.48),90%(n = 77)的参与者矫正视力>1.0。

结论

我们的结果表明,基于网络的眼部测试是一种有效且安全的方法,可用于测量健康眼睛的视力和屈光不正,特别是对于轻度近视。该工具可用于筛查目的,是主观验光测试的一种易于获取的替代方法。

试验注册

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03313921;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03313921

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bee/6874802/fac55482fe56/jmir_v21i11e14808_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验